Will we ever see another band such as Queen in our lifetime? I think I have

I find it astonishing that everybody on here does not care that Queen collected a prestigious award in 1989
for band of the 80s!
you may say numbers & award shows mean nothing but they happen to be Queen history, & rubber stamped,
and that was not My OPINION it was fact.
Sorry to say this again, but Queen really are the best of the best.
They have very impressive facts in there biography in the Queen fan club, people on here should buy a copy and educate themselves
If you do not agree that Queen were an amazing group then why are you all on here for?
All groups have fan sites, and they support the band they are with but on here they don't seem to.
This is a strange site for so called Queen lovers?

ludwigs: Are you sure you know how old you are? you say 48, 49 in june, do you not know?
i do not get my info from the media, but mainly from official Queen items, approved by the Queen fan club.
yes i work, yes i have a partner, and no i do not have children, anything else sir?

[QUOTE] [b]*goodco* wrote:[/b]

And Yes played to about 300,000 less than ten days later.
So now I know who the band of that decade was! Yes! Indeed![/QUOTE]

"An answer to all of your answers to yes" !!


Btw - earlier this year someone pointed us to some reports that Queen actually played to 350,000 people on the first night in Rio and 250,000 on the second night.

So Queen are actually the biggest band of the 80s.

Even though Simon and Garfunkel played to half a million in Central Park in 1981.

Can't you see that 350,000 is more than a half million? Facts are facts.

Queen may be my personal favourites, but I wouldn't suggest for a second they're bigger than The Beatles. I don't think any band was, or will ever be bigger than The Beatles. Just thought I'd throw that one in there.

[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]

If you do not agree that Queen were an amazing group then why are you all on here for?
All groups have fan sites, and they support the band they are with but on here they don't seem to.
This is a strange site for so called Queen lovers?
[/QUOTE]

Everyone here loves Queen.

We just don't blindly follow Queen like a religion and instead recognize that other bands exist, many of whom have achieved greater things than Queen did.

goodco: i know too who band of the 80s was because the award is sitting in Brian Mays Mansion. oh yes!

[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]

ludwigs: Are you sure you know how old you are? you say 48, 49 in june, do you not know?
i do not get my info from the media, but mainly from official Queen items, approved by the Queen fan club.
yes i work, yes i have a partner, and no i do not have children, anything else sir?[/QUOTE]

Yes, there is!!
I say I am 48. 49 in June. What part of that perplexes you? It means I am 48 years and 6 months and 2 weeks old! You must be very mentally sub-par if that catches you out.

You get your 'best-known Queen fan in your North East area' from official Queen sites.

Try to take a step back and think - Would these sites want to just present some facts as average or would they (like their press releases etc) want to offer them as astounding facts?

You haven't the capacity to think.

you either are 48 or 49 , you cant be both sweetie! lol
ha ha dont you worry your little brain out i am quite capable of thinking.
i know what you said but it does not look right.

[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]

you either are 48 or 49 , you cant be both sweetie! lol
[/QUOTE]

Oh my god. Are you actually that stupid?

He said he's 48 now, and will be 49 this coming June.

You are just stunningly, stunningly stupid.

[QUOTE]

[b]gerry wrote: [/b] you either are 48 or 49 , you cant be both sweetie! lol
ha ha dont you worry your little brain out i am quite capable of thinking.
i know what you said but it does not look right.
[/QUOTE]

He is [b]currently[/b] 48. He [b]will be[/b] 49 in June.

yes i know what he said i was just winding him up lol

[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]

you either are 48 or 49 , you cant be both sweetie! lol
ha ha dont you worry your little brain out i am quite capable of thinking.
i know what you said but it does not look right.
[/QUOTE]

Possibly cause it's not written like a Ladybird book!

Read back a third time. I am not yet 49! (That comes in June) Or more easily - I am 10 plus 10 plus 10 plus 10 plus 4 and 4! Simple enough for youses?

Real Wizard: you are stunningly stupid if you can not recognize a wind up! lol
i love winding you prats up on here its fab! ha ha ha

ludwig: Dont tell me you read ladybird books? now you are giving your mental age away now ! ha ha ha
bet you like ollie murs as well.

[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]

ludwig: Dont tell me you read ladybird books? now you are giving your mental age away now ! ha ha ha
bet you like ollie murs as well.[/QUOTE]

I'm not one of his fans BUT....he is selling well and he appears to be grounded.

I read Ladybird books to my son when he was young. Guess you've got those to look forward to soon. - Reading them.

Where in the hard North East are you? I have a friend from around Newcastle and he IS a true fan. Goes to all the conventions - even flies to the US for some too, and he is always seeing BM and RT gigs when they were on. Went Montreux last year to visit Fred statue with a lot of other Queenies and is on close terms with Jen and Jacqui.
As the North Easts BIGGEST fan ( I meant Rod - Argent) did you make any effort to do anything similar? So, he could ask you how you feel YOU are a true Queen fan compared to him. Seem reasonable?
Unfortunately, he likes and listens to other music too