"Let Me In"

[QUOTE]

[b]inu-liger wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]master marathon runner wrote:[/b]
Why your English no good is ?[/QUOTE]

From Russia he is.[/QUOTE]

I'm from Argenchina and my English it's not THAT bad, it is?

I always thought The Works was a little too short. So there clearly was room for LMIYHA on it. So it would've been for artistic rather than space reasons. So far we have two theories.

* Key disagreement (confirmed).

* It's too similar to something. To me it's not It's A Hard Life that it's too similar (in places) to but Hammer To Fall. But not so similar that'd be a problem.

I'll throw in a potential third reason:

* Balance of writing credits

As it stands I rather like BOTH versions. Heretical to like the William Orbit version, I know. :-)

Side A 
1. Radio Ga Ga 
2. Hammer To Fall
3. It's A Hard Life 
4. Is This the World We Created. ..?

Side B 
1. I Want To Break Free (single version)
2. Machines (or back to humans)
3. There Must Be More To Life Than This (while we're adding OTHER songs)
4. Not Tear It Up....maybe Man On Fire
5. I Go Crazy


But I understand that's making an uneven A-B side

Btw penetration guru. ... funniest joke of the year so far

The bigger picture is quite fascinating, and some above posts are very interesting. The tracklisting of this album is a total mistery. From a purely artistic standpoint, even a b-side like I Go Crazy is far more interesting than Tear It Up (simply awful), Man On The Prowl (guys, you already did that. It Was called CLTCL and it was way better. Plus what's the deal with the abrupt ending which cuts the piano run?), and the lamenting ITTWWC. The Let Me In YOur Heart Again case is also of interest, I didn't know about the key disagreement thing, plus the fact that it wasn't finished at the time. But still, if there's one Queen album where I would gladly change the tracklisting, it's The Works. The released version doesn't work at all as an album.

The final tracklist for 'The Works' album was probably the result of their personal egos/writing credits/money issue.

I'd care more for Jazz being rearranged than The Works - I believe Jazz could be made into a stellar album as a whole (rather than just a bunch of slightly disparate and perhaps poorly mixed stellar tracks). So while The Works' tracklist is probably worse, Jazz's had more potential to be great.

Martin Packer has a good point about similarity to Hammer to Fall. The opening isn't identical, but it's rather similar to the point that Let Me In's evoked Hammer to Fall for me the moment I heard it, despite the difference in key. Then there's the fact that Let Me In's guitar solo, particularly in the first bars, sounds a lot like the first section of Hammer to Fall's guitar solo (that is, the whole part which was cut out for the single/video version). I don't know if that solo on Let Me In was recorded in 1984 or 2014 - the former would make more sense, with Brian possibly having recycled certain aspects of the decrepit Let Me In for Hammer to Fall (unless I'm wrong in assuming that the latter's solo was recorded after Let Me In was abandoned).

Jazz coulda been great just by throwing out Roger's tracks and Leaving Home. Which is exactly what I've done in my iTunes library.

[QUOTE] [b]rocknrolllover wrote:[/b]

Why "Let Me in" not on The Works album? [/QUOTE]

Why are you so boring and stupid?
Must suck to be you.

[QUOTE] [b]people on streets wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]rocknrolllover wrote:[/b]

Why "Let Me in" not on The Works album? [/QUOTE]

Why are you so boring and stupid?
Must suck to be you.[/QUOTE]


Why are you so mean? Our buddy just asked a question. You can answer it or not but dont be cruel.
For me Let Me In didnt make it cos probably Freddie had final word.
About the key of the song i dont think Freddie could not pulled it of.
In those Works era their egos make that song unfinished and Fred probably said "oo fuck it"..do what you want.

Mr. Mouth: rocknrolllover used to be a troll and in the times when Rainbow wasn't released he used to do/say nasty things (according to other QZrs).

And BTW, correct your signature. It should say this:

"Mr. Mouth always say the truth!!"
"Such a clean machine."
"I'm a cherub."

[QUOTE] [b]BETA215 wrote:[/b]

Mr. Mouth: rocknrolllover used to be a troll and in the times when Rainbow wasn't released he used to do/say nasty things (according to other QZrs).

And BTW, correct your signature. It should say this:

"Mr. Mouth always say the truth!!"
"Such a clean machine."
"I'm a cherub."
[/QUOTE]




I don't deny it, but it wasn't crime.
But you are all not better than me.
I am not a troll I repeated it many times
But you can repeat it many times
Your spoiled nature
And bad culture

[QUOTE] [b]BETA215 wrote:[/b]

Mr. Mouth: rocknrolllover used to be a troll and in the times when Rainbow wasn't released he used to do/say nasty things (according to other QZrs).

And BTW, correct your signature. It should say this:

"Mr. Mouth always say the truth!!"
"Such a clean machine."
"I'm a cherub."
[/QUOTE]

I wanted ask a question, nstead, only dirt and assaults. What a shame.

[QUOTE] [b]BETA215 wrote:[/b]

Mr. Mouth: rocknrolllover used to be a troll and in the times when Rainbow wasn't released he used to do/say nasty things (according to other QZrs).

And BTW, correct your signature. It should say this:

"Mr. Mouth always say the truth!!"
"Such a clean machine."
"I'm a cherub."
[/QUOTE]

Why should it say that?

[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]master marathon runner wrote:[/b]
Why your English no good is ?[/QUOTE]

From Russia he is.[/QUOTE]



Russia is The Great Country. The Russians are wonderful people. And always will be.
Obama doesn't put Russia on a knees.

[QUOTE] [b]master marathon runner wrote:[/b]

Why your English no good is ?[/QUOTE]



Why your question not so polite?