Watching the pic i had to throwup. A tranny on his trandition Phase wearing an ugly unofficial Queenshirt
Vocal harmony · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]bucsateflon wrote:[/b]
because of the glitter [/QUOTE]
Watching the pic i had to throwup. A tranny on his trandition Phase wearing an ugly unofficial Queenshirt[/QUOTE]
Seems to be a common problem that Lambert makes you throwup. You obviously need hospitalisation for your on going problem. Not surgical or medical but some kind of psychiatric unit were you can be looked after properly and kept away from social media and images and video of Lambert.
I'm sure in the long term you might recover. Good luck
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]bucsateflon wrote:[/b]
because of the glitter [/QUOTE]
Watching the pic i had to throwup. A tranny on his trandition Phase wearing an ugly unofficial Queenshirt[/QUOTE]
Seems to be a common problem that Lambert makes you throwup. You obviously need hospitalisation for your on going problem. Not surgical or medical but some kind of psychiatric unit were you can be looked after properly and kept away from social media and images and video of Lambert.
I'm sure in the long term you might recover. Good luck[/QUOTE]
No one recovers after seeing this abomination called QAL and Lamebird destroying QUeen songs in his most ugly way
Vocal harmony · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]bucsateflon wrote:[/b]
Adam Lambert is a compromise for Queen.[/QUOTE]
Anyone who steps on stage with them is a compromise
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]bucsateflon wrote:[/b]
Adam Lambert is a compromise for Queen.[/QUOTE]
Anyone who steps on stage with them is a compromise [/QUOTE]
There is a difference between a compromise (which Paul Rodgers was but he was believable and a Rock singer) and a fucking joke like Lame-Bert doing his bad cabaret act.
SweetCaroline · Member since
Brian and Roger wanted to have a Queen music only show instead of the compromise of playing half Queen music and half Bad Company/Free music!
Go to a Queen show with Adam and you would know how magnificent it has been!
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Brian and Roger wanted to have a Queen music only show instead of the compromise of playing half Queen music and half Bad Company/Free music!
Go to a Queen show with Adam and you would know how magnificent it has been!
[/QUOTE]
I have seen anough of this trainwreck to hate this crap. Don't know what is "magnificent" foryou. QAL has been a damn shame from day one this ugly bastard entered the scene
snifflese · Member since
Paul Rogers had zero charisma, was boring as heck and if I go to a Queen concert, I don't want Bad Company music. Can you understand that? He doesn't have the voice for the majority of the music and it didn't sound light, fun, and quirky like a good part of their music should. I wouldn't pay 2 cents to hear him front the band. We all have different opinions. To me and almost all the people who see QAL, this is the best it can be without Freddie. Less people are now talking about how Adam can't measure up to Freddie, which is a good thing. You have to appreciate what is being offered now and not dwell on what isn't. People who can't do that are unhappy people, like you, who tries to make everyone else unhappy.
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Paul Rogers had zero charisma, was boring as heck and if I go to a Queen concert, I don't want Bad Company music. Can you understand that? He doesn't have the voice for the majority of the music and it didn't sound light, fun, and quirky like a good part of their music should. I wouldn't pay 2 cents to hear him front the band. We all have different opinions. To me and almost all the people who see QAL, this is the best it can be without Freddie. Less people are now talking about how Adam can't measure up to Freddie, which is a good thing. You have to appreciate what is being offered now and not dwell on what isn't. People who can't do that are unhappy people, like you, who tries to make everyone else unhappy.[/QUOTE]
You sad losers eat up your own arguments. When the real fans say !this is not Queen" you say "yes it is Queen PLUS AL". SO how many original AL songs did you hear you sad cunts? 1 maximum per show. Nowadays ZERO. Queen PLUS Paul Rodgers was a solid cooperation of 3 Rock ICONS, totally believable, some songs did not work and I went there to hear Queen sings AND Bad Company SOngs AND Free songs and in the whole these were great raw rock shows and no cabaret act with a sad tranny with no talent taken from a casting show fronting them which is totally unbelievable, manufactured and laughable. YOU sad Glamtarts have no clue about Rock music so I doubt you have ever heard of Free and BC so I get that. You'd rather listen to crap like Two Fux and some of the wanker's "great" solo stuff of which legends are made of. Thank God QAL is over now and it is back to EMO dance pop for Lame-Bert. That's where he belongs
snifflese · Member since
Listen, dude, I am a metal lover. I have seen Iron Maiden (tied with Queen for #1), Judas Priest, Ozzie and a lot more metal bands. I love Ac/Dc, Guns and Roses and the heavy Swedish Metal groups. I have listened to metal groups for 35 years so you don't know crap about me. I listened to Black Sabbath and Queen when they first came out many years ago. Don't lump me in with people that don't have a clue. My kids were in metal bands and I took them to all the concerts and heard their music. I know all about Metal and love it.
Who cares what Adam's own music sounds like? With QAL he is singing Queen music and that is the only important thing. THAT is what I want to hear when I pay big bucks to see them. I don't give a rat's patootie about Bad Company. That kind of rock and his kind of voice I hate, just to be clear. He is in no way suited to sing Queen's music. Adam's fits the vibe andhe has the vocal range to sing anything that they have written. Sure, he is stronger in some songs (UP, WWTLFTSMGO, RG, KQ), but his voice is good enough to carry any of them off. There are NEVER any complaints about Adam's voice. It is always mentioned in tweets, instagrams and reviews. I am so sick of you and the thin voice idea. Until you have sat your ugly behind in a concert to hear them, you have NO CLUE! That voice can drown out the band and it is ringing throughout the whole venue. He has the power of an opera singer.
I don't have to use dirty words and call people names as only sad, pathetic individuals resort to that. People with no argument use nasty names to call people since they don't have anything productive to say. We get that you hate them. Fine, but this isn't Groundhog Day and hearing it once is more than enough. Give it a rest!
Vocal harmony · Member since
This ^^^^
Although I would dispute the opera sing quote
runner_70 · Member since
I have to listen to constant praise of the three(!!!!!) lunatics on here as well so I can say what i want. And anyone calling Ozzy Osbourne "Ozzie" is a sad pretender as well. I stand by it: You sad fuck have no clue when it comes to rock music. No rock music lover would like Lame-Bert. Especially when he is fronting the once mightiest band in the world and dragging em thru the mud. Gimme PR anytime on the ROCK songs (which is 70% of the setlist) insztead of this tool's lil girl's voice.
SweetCaroline · Member since
He doesn’t have a girl’s voice!
queenUSA · Member since
Sept 19th I went to the show at the Park theater. Seats were small and tight together. The problem I had was with the crowd, most of them seemed to just be incidentally in town and needed a ticket to some sort of show and somehow aimlessly picked this one. They didn’t dance or move much at all. They were frozen block heads. Why did they even come? Did they know the words to any Queen songs at all? How about the sing along to Love of My Life? Certainly not. The crowd was a complete dud. Radio ga-ga a complete waste on that lot. Because of this diluted crowd factor I can’t endorse Vegas as a venue to appreciate the show from a collective crowd standpoint. In contrast, had a way better experience at Hammersmith in the stalls with people who actually knew why they were there and gave a shit as it were. I wonder what the band truly thought of their Las Vegas crowds? Not much I think. Must have been torture for them playing so many nights with crowds like that.
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]queenUSA wrote:[/b]
Sept 19th I went to the show at the Park theater. Seats were small and tight together. The problem I had was with the crowd, most of them seemed to just be incidentally in town and needed a ticket to some sort of show and somehow aimlessly picked this one. They didn’t dance or move much at all. They were frozen block heads. Why did they even come? Did they know the words to any Queen songs at all? How about the sing along to Love of My Life? Certainly not. The crowd was a complete dud. Radio ga-ga a complete waste on that lot. Because of this diluted crowd factor I can’t endorse Vegas as a venue to appreciate the show from a collective crowd standpoint. In contrast, had a way better experience at Hammersmith in the stalls with people who actually knew why they were there and gave a shit as it were. I wonder what the band truly thought of their Las Vegas crowds? Not much I think. Must have been torture for them playing so many nights with crowds like that. [/QUOTE]
Well thats what you get when you play in front of a gambling holiday crowd. But as Maylor dont care about their Reputation anymore they go for the$$$$