bucsateflon wrote:
because of the glitter
Watching the pic i had to throwup. A tranny on his trandition Phase wearing an ugly unofficial Queenshirt
bucsateflon wrote:
because of the glitter
runner_70 wrote:
bucsateflon wrote:
because of the glitter
Watching the pic i had to throwup. A tranny on his trandition Phase wearing an ugly unofficial Queenshirt
Vocal harmony wrote:
runner_70 wrote:
bucsateflon wrote:
because of the glitter
Watching the pic i had to throwup. A tranny on his trandition Phase wearing an ugly unofficial Queenshirt
Seems to be a common problem that Lambert makes you throwup. You obviously need hospitalisation for your on going problem. Not surgical or medical but some kind of psychiatric unit were you can be looked after properly and kept away from social media and images and video of Lambert.
I'm sure in the long term you might recover. Good luck
bucsateflon wrote:
Adam Lambert is a compromise for Queen.
Vocal harmony wrote:
bucsateflon wrote:
Adam Lambert is a compromise for Queen.
Anyone who steps on stage with them is a compromise
SweetCaroline wrote:
Brian and Roger wanted to have a Queen music only show instead of the compromise of playing half Queen music and half Bad Company/Free music!
Go to a Queen show with Adam and you would know how magnificent it has been!
snifflese wrote:
Paul Rogers had zero charisma, was boring as heck and if I go to a Queen concert, I don't want Bad Company music. Can you understand that? He doesn't have the voice for the majority of the music and it didn't sound light, fun, and quirky like a good part of their music should. I wouldn't pay 2 cents to hear him front the band. We all have different opinions. To me and almost all the people who see QAL, this is the best it can be without Freddie. Less people are now talking about how Adam can't measure up to Freddie, which is a good thing. You have to appreciate what is being offered now and not dwell on what isn't. People who can't do that are unhappy people, like you, who tries to make everyone else unhappy.
queenUSA wrote:
Sept 19th I went to the show at the Park theater. Seats were small and tight together. The problem I had was with the crowd, most of them seemed to just be incidentally in town and needed a ticket to some sort of show and somehow aimlessly picked this one. They didn’t dance or move much at all. They were frozen block heads. Why did they even come? Did they know the words to any Queen songs at all? How about the sing along to Love of My Life? Certainly not. The crowd was a complete dud. Radio ga-ga a complete waste on that lot. Because of this diluted crowd factor I can’t endorse Vegas as a venue to appreciate the show from a collective crowd standpoint. In contrast, had a way better experience at Hammersmith in the stalls with people who actually knew why they were there and gave a shit as it were. I wonder what the band truly thought of their Las Vegas crowds? Not much I think. Must have been torture for them playing so many nights with crowds like that.