Vocal harmony wrote:
^^^^ Which lines are you reading between.
Brian is far more intelligent than most on here, why would he steer this into a ditch he's not a film maker writer producer or director, so would leave film making to those who know. But of course you know better.
I wonder why someone who chose not to post for so long felt the need to re appear on such a negative wave, first Lambert bashing now criticising Brian over something you know nothing about
He’s not a producer, and yet he’s a producer on this film, deeply involved in the creative direction, and according to the lead actor, on set all the time, along with Roger. Don’t mistake you knowing nothing about it for others knowing nothing about it.
Brian has strong opinions, about pretty much everything, and you’re frankly a bit naive if you don’t realize he has been all over this, all the time, from the beginning. Biographic films are at risk of sacrificing depth and truths and complexity when they’re not created at arm’s length from their subjects, or at least when their subjects are on set every day in their own director’s chair. It will be fine - for what it is - in the same way that Q+AL is fine - for what it is. It will appeal to a general audience who will neither know nor need to know what they’ve missed. Sound good to you? Knock yourself out. It opens December 25.
Negative IS my experience of Adam Lambert. I literally CANNOT watch any clip for any extended length of time without cringing and needing to bail. For me, his creative choices are frequently terrible, he is grossly inauthentic, particularly as a rock singer, and his voice is far, far from the instrument of milk and honey it’s purported to be. He’s the black velvet painting with Jesus and Elvis looking down from Heaven in the Queen Museum.
As for the Church Lady portion of your comments, take a look at my handle. I was a profoundly grateful fan for a very long time. Queen went low, and I got negative. Check your URL. This isn’t Queezone For Positive People.