You’ll probably be bitching about Rami Malek when the movie comes out!
[/QUOTE]
Reading between the lines of all the various fallings out during the loooong production, it's an extremely good bet that Brian's hyper-controlled the thing straight into the ditch. I don't think it much matters who plays who. I expect it will be a dazzling, superficial affair aimed straight at dilettantes and his current fans.[/QUOTE]
Vocal harmony · Member since
^^^^ Which lines are you reading between.
Brian is far more intelligent than most on here, why would he steer this into a ditch he's not a film maker writer producer or director, so would leave film making to those who know. But of course you know better.
I wonder why someone who chose not to post for so long felt the need to re appear on such a negative wave, first Lambert bashing now criticising Brian over something you know nothing about
GratefulFan · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]
^^^^ Which lines are you reading between.
Brian is far more intelligent than most on here, why would he steer this into a ditch he's not a film maker writer producer or director, so would leave film making to those who know. But of course you know better.
I wonder why someone who chose not to post for so long felt the need to re appear on such a negative wave, first Lambert bashing now criticising Brian over something you know nothing about[/QUOTE]
He’s not a producer, and yet he’s a producer on this film, deeply involved in the creative direction, and according to the lead actor, on set all the time, along with Roger. Don’t mistake you knowing nothing about it for others knowing nothing about it.
Brian has strong opinions, about pretty much everything, and you’re frankly a bit naive if you don’t realize he has been all over this, all the time, from the beginning. Biographic films are at risk of sacrificing depth and truths and complexity when they’re not created at arm’s length from their subjects, or at least when their subjects are on set every day in their own director’s chair. It will be fine - for what it is - in the same way that Q+AL is fine - for what it is. It will appeal to a general audience who will neither know nor need to know what they’ve missed. Sound good to you? Knock yourself out. It opens December 25.
Negative IS my experience of Adam Lambert. I literally CANNOT watch any clip for any extended length of time without cringing and needing to bail. For me, his creative choices are frequently terrible, he is grossly inauthentic, particularly as a rock singer, and his voice is far, far from the instrument of milk and honey it’s purported to be. He’s the black velvet painting with Jesus and Elvis looking down from Heaven in the Queen Museum.
As for the Church Lady portion of your comments, take a look at my handle. I was a profoundly grateful fan for a very long time. Queen went low, and I got negative. Check your URL. This isn’t Queezone For Positive People.
Iron Butterfly · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
I don’t think either Freddie OR Adam sound like a goat. That is a blatant insult to two of the best male singers who have performed magnificently on this planet. If we are talking about vibrato, yes both of them have used that technique at times to stretch their voices in reaching the upper ranges. But they certainly don’t use it constantly.
It’s absurd and not worthy of being discussed.
[/QUOTE]
Not what you said just a few posts ago about Freddie. Is it tit for tat?
rockchic65 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]
Grateful fan You are spot on about Lambert he is terrible and Queen cannot get any lower with him been lead singer.
I also gave my entire life as far as been a devoted Queen fan was concerned, and just like you it breaks my heart to see such a brilliant band go from heroes to zeroes.[/QUOTE]
How is being successful terrible? Just because it's not what you're interested in doesn't make it bad, they're having a blast you only need to see their faces and the audiences are loving them. Doesn't matter at the end of the day though, I'm pretty sure they couldn't give a flying one what you or a couple of other fans think.
Saint Jiub · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]
^^^^ Which lines are you reading between.
Brian is far more intelligent than most on here, why would he steer this into a ditch he's not a film maker writer producer or director, so would leave film making to those who know. But of course you know better.
I wonder why someone who chose not to post for so long felt the need to re appear on such a negative wave, first Lambert bashing now criticising Brian over something you know nothing about[/QUOTE]
As per the timeline shown in the below link ...
For 10 years, from 2008 to 2017, this movie was nearly steered into a ditch with all hands switching the deck chairs on the Titanic ... with Brian and Roger cluelessly at the helm.
Fortunately, the 2017-2018 QAL tour kept Brian and Roger busy enough so that they could not muck things up further ... and let the "yes men" finish the movie with minimal interference.
as for your condescending insults directed at GF ...
You are asking why GF left Turdzone years ago? Isn't it obvious?
As for GF coming back ... in my opinion no one can resist the lure of the trainwreck otherwise known as QZ and stay away forever.
Holly2003 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
As per the timeline shown in the below link ...
For 10 years, from 2008 to 2017, this movie was nearly steered into a ditch with all hands switching the deck chairs on the Titanic ... with Brian and Roger cluelessly at the helm.
Fortunately, the 2017-2018 QAL tour kept Brian and Roger busy enough so that they could not muck things up further ... and let the "yes men" finish the movie with minimal interference.
as for your condescending insults directed at GF ...
You are asking why GF left Turdzone years ago? Isn't it obvious?
As for GF coming back ... in my opinion no one can resist the lure of the trainwreck otherwise known as QZ and stay away forever.
[/QUOTE]
Spot on in every regard. And welcome back Grateful Fan, bane of the Queenzone thought police! ;)
runner_70 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]
Negative IS my experience of Adam Lambert. I literally CANNOT watch any clip for any extended length of time without cringing and needing to bail. For me, his creative choices are frequently terrible, he is grossly inauthentic, particularly as a rock singer, and his voice is far, far from the instrument of milk and honey it’s purported to be. He’s the black velvet painting with Jesus and Elvis looking down from Heaven in the Queen Museum.
As for the Church Lady portion of your comments, take a look at my handle. I was a profoundly grateful fan for a very long time. Queen went low, and I got negative. Check your URL. This isn’t Queezone For Positive People.
[/QUOTE]
Awesome
rockchic65 · Member since
^^^^^^ You do realize there's not only you who can doctor people's posts runner? If there's no mods on here to stop you then you're fair game as well. I predict you'll be singing Adam's praises courtesy of someone very soon!! You reap what you sow!!!!
rockchic65 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]
Rockchic You keep repeating yourself saying AL & Queen are having a blast, yeah i am sure they are ripping off the fans big time, Brian & Roger always said they were pretty certain Adam would loose them army of ardent Queen fans and yes he has but Glamberts have filled in a few seats and as for you saying look at the faces in the audiences well i guess its them thinking it looks all false and wrong. Empty spaces on the stage that Lambert cannot fill with his small fake personality. Lambert is not creative in any way and it shows, he certainly did not deserve the chance to tour with Queen at all. Someone with a bit more spunk like David Coverdale would have been awesome.[/QUOTE]
I don't repeat myself anymore than you!!! He might have lost them a few fans but there's a hell of a lot at these shows as you'd know if you read twitter. Adam has some die hard fans but not enough to fill arena's so you're wrong on that score, there's loads of Queen fans at these shows, both long term die hards and casual Queen fans. There's been a lot of other musician's at the Vegas shows as well, in fact I find it interesting to see their tweets afterwards, especially when they're clearly hard rock/metal dudes who come away loving the show, I guess they aren't as narrow minded as you'd like to believe.
IMO he does deserve to tour with them because aside from being the one they want to tour with he works hard and puts 100% into making sure the show is the best it can be night after night. You can call him all you like for all his supposed failings in your eyes but you can't fault his work ethic. And seriously (David Coverdale)? I love Whitesnake but have you heard him sing live lately?
runner_70 · Member since
I agree that coverdale is a shadow of his former self but i rather have a 10% Coverdale instead of 100% Lamebert
rockchic65 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]
I agree that coverdale is a shadow of his former self but i rather have a 10% Coverdale instead of 100% Lamebert[/QUOTE]
Good job it's not your call, glad you agree on his voice though. It's a shame, I've always loved his voice but to be fair he is 67 so he's not gonna sound the same. Age is a bitch.
Vocal harmony · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]
^^^^ Which lines are you reading between.
Brian is far more intelligent than most on here, why would he steer this into a ditch he's not a film maker writer producer or director, so would leave film making to those who know. But of course you know better.
I wonder why someone who chose not to post for so long felt the need to re appear on such a negative wave, first Lambert bashing now criticising Brian over something you know nothing about[/QUOTE]
As per the timeline shown in the below link ...
For 10 years, from 2008 to 2017, this movie was nearly steered into a ditch with all hands switching the deck chairs on the Titanic ... with Brian and Roger cluelessly at the helm.
Fortunately, the 2017-2018 QAL tour kept Brian and Roger busy enough so that they could not muck things up further ... and let the "yes men" finish the movie with minimal interference.
as for your condescending insults directed at GF ...
You are asking why GF left Turdzone years ago? Isn't it obvious?
As for GF coming back ... in my opinion no one can resist the lure of the trainwreck otherwise known as QZ and stay away forever.
[/QUOTE]
rockchic65 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]
David Coverdale would still sound better than Adam Lambert even if he is 67, he has a superb rock pedigree and he is worth his weight in gold.
Whitesnake were a brilliant rock band and Coverdale has a great rock voice, someone with substance.[/QUOTE]
I agree Whitesnake were brilliant and I love Coverdale's voice as it was but sadly it hasn't held up, like I said not surprising when you consider his age and the fact he's a baritone singing in a tenor's range with the extreme stuff he used to do with his voice. I love a lot of the rock music from that era but most of them couldn't still sing the same now, certainly not live night after night.
