Freddie & AL BoRap supercut

I agree that coverdale is a shadow of his former self but i rather have a 10% Coverdale instead of 100% Lamebert

runner_70 wrote:

I agree that coverdale is a shadow of his former self but i rather have a 10% Coverdale instead of 100% Lamebert

Good job it's not your call, glad you agree on his voice though. It's a shame, I've always loved his voice but to be fair he is 67 so he's not gonna sound the same. Age is a bitch.

David Coverdale would still sound better than Adam Lambert even if he is 67, he has a superb rock pedigree and he is worth his weight in gold.
Whitesnake were a brilliant rock band and Coverdale has a great rock voice, someone with substance.

Saint Jiub wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

^^^^ Which lines are you reading between.

Brian is far more intelligent than most on here, why would he steer this into a ditch he's not a film maker writer producer or director, so would leave film making to those who know. But of course you know better.

I wonder why someone who chose not to post for so long felt the need to re appear on such a negative wave, first Lambert bashing now criticising Brian over something you know nothing about

As per the timeline shown in the below link ...

For 10 years, from 2008 to 2017, this movie was nearly steered into a ditch with all hands switching the deck chairs on the Titanic ... with Brian and Roger cluelessly at the helm.

Fortunately, the 2017-2018 QAL tour kept Brian and Roger busy enough so that they could not muck things up further ... and let the "yes men" finish the movie with minimal interference.

www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/8055041/freddie-mercury-queen-biopic-bohemian-rhapsody-production-timeline

...

as for your condescending insults directed at GF ...

You are asking why GF left Turdzone years ago? Isn't it obvious?

As for GF coming back ... in my opinion no one can resist the lure of the trainwreck otherwise known as QZ and stay away forever.

happystar wrote:

David Coverdale would still sound better than Adam Lambert even if he is 67, he has a superb rock pedigree and he is worth his weight in gold.
Whitesnake were a brilliant rock band and Coverdale has a great rock voice, someone with substance.

I agree Whitesnake were brilliant and I love Coverdale's voice as it was but sadly it hasn't held up, like I said not surprising when you consider his age and the fact he's a baritone singing in a tenor's range with the extreme stuff he used to do with his voice. I love a lot of the rock music from that era but most of them couldn't still sing the same now, certainly not live night after night.

Who cares about the pedigree, if you can't bring it anymore? That is the same with Rogers. All I hear is that he an icon and worthy to be on stage. To me he is boring as paint and I would choose Adam any day of the week. It is what you can do now, not what you might have done in the past. There are too many happy fans: Adam's, die hard Queenies, casual Queen fans, and new fans that are raving about QAL (if you ever bothered to look at Instagram or other social media sites) for this not to have been a huge success. The remarks almost always include a mention of that superb voice of Adam's. That is a huge draw! No one wants to see a band where the singer is lame! Adam is amazing!! Put him together with amazing iconic musicians and it is simply a dream come true for millions of fans! You don't like it, no sweat, but whining on and on about it, doesn't change the facts that QAL is a huge success in every way!

Amen, snifflese !!!!!

Typical females praising a pretty boy that is not talent that is crush time cos you think the sun shines out of his arse but he has not exactley proved that though has he? He certainly is not creative and he makes a living singing with a broken rock group singing karaoke songs wooooooooooah sorry but that dont excite me and Lambert is as bland as dog poo up next doors wall for me.

When I watch a periscope of the QAL shows and fans are signing in live from all over the world from different time zones in Japan, Poland, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, Croatia, Finland, UK, Canada, Brazil, it is obvious those are people who are well acquainted with the legendary front man as well as the legendary musicians.

I am not so shallow that looks make a huge difference. Good looks don't help when you can't really sing too well. There are plenty of people that are "stars" where that is the case. It, however. does not apply to Adam, who has a fantastic, one of a kind voice. Now, I never said, it doesn't hurt to be good looking, that is just icing on the cake. Most fans come for the voice! You can dislike Adam for many reasons, but you cannot argue that the man doesn't have a trememdous voice. You may not find the trype of voice appealing to you, but his voice is one a million. Talk to any voice teacher or expert and they would say to get your ears cleaned or a hearing aid, depending on how old you are.

Lambert has a west end musical voice which is unsuitable for any rock band. He is not a rock n roller just like Dolly Parton is not a punk rocker - get it?

happystar wrote:

Typical females praising a pretty boy that is not talent that is crush time cos you think the sun shines out of his arse but he has not exactley proved that though has he? He certainly is not creative and he makes a living singing with a broken rock group singing karaoke songs wooooooooooah sorry but that dont excite me and Lambert is as bland as dog poo up next doors wall for me.

It is such a tragedy that "those typical females" are incapable of thinking "brilliantly" with their dicks like that "savior", happystar

Saint jiub You do post childish comments, grow up.

GratefulFan wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

^^^^ Which lines are you reading between.

Brian is far more intelligent than most on here, why would he steer this into a ditch he's not a film maker writer producer or director, so would leave film making to those who know. But of course you know better.

I wonder why someone who chose not to post for so long felt the need to re appear on such a negative wave, first Lambert bashing now criticising Brian over something you know nothing about

He’s not a producer, and yet he’s a producer on this film, deeply involved in the creative direction, and according to the lead actor, on set all the time, along with Roger. Don’t mistake you knowing nothing about it for others knowing nothing about it.

Brian has strong opinions, about pretty much everything, and you’re frankly a bit naive if you don’t realize he has been all over this, all the time, from the beginning. Biographic films are at risk of sacrificing depth and truths and complexity when they’re not created at arm’s length from their subjects, or at least when their subjects are on set every day in their own director’s chair. It will be fine - for what it is - in the same way that Q+AL is fine - for what it is. It will appeal to a general audience who will neither know nor need to know what they’ve missed. Sound good to you? Knock yourself out. It opens December 25.

Negative IS my experience of Adam Lambert. I literally CANNOT watch any clip for any extended length of time without cringing and needing to bail. For me, his creative choices are frequently terrible, he is grossly inauthentic, particularly as a rock singer, and his voice is far, far from the instrument of milk and honey it’s purported to be. He’s the black velvet painting with Jesus and Elvis looking down from Heaven in the Queen Museum.

As for the Church Lady portion of your comments, take a look at my handle. I was a profoundly grateful fan for a very long time. Queen went low, and I got negative. Check your URL. This isn’t Queezone For Positive People.

I respect and am grateful for your articulate response, even if I disagree. There are a couple adolescents here who can barely string together a sentence.

To me Adam is a very talented and technically skilled vocalist, but the voice isn't perhaps an ideal match for Queen. I do enjoy the collaboration nonetheless, but will not fault anyone who does not otherwise.