It's strange that a technical person like you chose to reply to a triviality instead of this:
[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]
Despite what clowns such as yourself seem to think, mixing audio is not something you can do well without quite a bit of training, not to mention that it's a lot of work, and a substantial part of that work is absolutely tedious. It also takes a considerable number of tools that you couldn't use if the content is on a bluray or dvd - multi-band compression? Nope. EQ-ing separate tracks with a set of generic hifi speakers? Good luck!
At least 99% of the potential buyers of Queen-products couldn't do it, nor would they want to - they want the best possible sound, which they're not going to get if they have to do the mixing themselves.[/QUOTE]
What do you think, is it a strong truth or pure imbecility?
the words of a true pretentious imbecile:
[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]
Despite what clowns such as yourself seem to think, mixing audio is not something you can do well without quite a bit of training, not to mention that it's a lot of work, and a substantial part of that work is absolutely tedious. It also takes a considerable number of tools that you couldn't use if the content is on a bluray or dvd - multi-band compression? Nope. EQ-ing separate tracks with a set of generic hifi speakers? Good luck!
[/QUOTE]
I guess this idiot never heard of the Queen Studio Experience at Montreaux.
Poor people were given the chance to MIX some tracks, I wonder what retards thought of that "stupid" idea
The man is so limited that he still doesn't understand we are not talking about real mixing.
It's about combining several tracks (NOT THE ORIGINAL ONES) EQ'ed and compressed (how else?), maybe submixes, all prepared for this multitrack experience by his beloved professional mix engineers.
And the "99% who want the best possible sound" have also a standard mix, if this is an issue.
Anyway, all is imaginary, but it seems there is already someone concerned how to restrain our imagination.
