Brian loses his sh*t in Brisbane :-(

ST16 wrote:@Brenski Why are you been such a prick for?
You are very obnoxious and you have no right to judge other peoples posts on here because you are not god.
Get off your high horse and let people have there say .
Just shows you do not know who is posting what and now you are accusing me of been "Freddie Jupiter" to which i need an apology from you.

you can't blame people for suspecting Freddie Jupiter may be you. You are the undisputed king of name-changing and multiple IDs.

lest we forget:
[color=red]Champagne Freddie[/color]
[color=green]100%[/color]
[color=blue]Jazz+[/color]
[color=orange]SW17[/color]
[color=purple]ST16[/color]
[color=red]SW10[/color]
[color=green].....[/color]
[color=blue]gerry[/color]
[color=orange]user1[/color]
[color=purple]rugbyguy[/color]
[color=red]Mr_Music[/color]
[color=green]Queen2[/color]
[color=blue]BQT8[/color]
[color=orange]happy_star[/color]
[color=purple]British Man[/color]

and possibly; [color=brown]Fat Bottomed Queen[/color] - and God knows how many more, besides.

so yet again, you're calling others out for making more than reasonable assumptions. it's easy to make a mistake like this, when the chief suspect has had so many usernames.

Freddie Jupiter wrote:

I'm absolutely astounded at the amount of mental gymnastics some people are prepared to engage in on this forum to justify Brian's appaling, and progressively worsening, behaviour.

There is no justifying his disgusting treatment of the cameraman in Brisbane or his narcissistic, entitled behaviour in that hotel. Quite simply he was in the wrong on both accounts, and in the first case he was indisputably in the wrong from a purely legal perspective as well.

And this is aside from his continuous attempts to erase Freddie's immense contribution to queens success and continuing popularity by employing an overweight karaoke singer and by outright lying in the queen movie, (now known as Brian's revenge)

Quite simply Brian's immense envy towards Freddie is going to destroy him and queens legacy. In fact it's gotten to a point where i simply can't enjoy listening to queen, my favourite band for two decades, anymore.

I really believe that fans should band together in disapproval of his behaviour and the genral direction in which he has been steering queens legacy, instead of supporting it and feeding his near infinite narcissism and self-importance.

So after letting the camera man film than asking him to allow some private time with fans is wrong.

Or asking someone in a gym not to play something is wrong?

Brian May's reaction to the camera man was the result of him feeling that the use of a camera was being intrusive.

I've been in a gym when someone hasn't liked the music being played and asked for it to be stopped. . .not a problem. The problem is when it's some one famous enough to build a story around, maybe twist it a little in the way certain people tell it then for stuff like this to be commented on here and on the Q+AL by someone with a Brian May and Q+AL hate agenda.

The film has been discussed by plenty of people, and to those with a bit a understanding, things aren't quite the way you'd seem to like them to be. Brian May didn't make the film.

Your other accusation about Brian May trying to erase Freddie. He appears on screen at every Queen show, in every interview with him or Roger if the subject of Freddie is brought up both praise him. Also in all the documentaries Brian has had nothing but good to say about Freddie..

It's quite obvious what your here for, it's obvious enough what your trying to do.

Try this instead, this is a Queen site try starting a conversation that actually talks about the band in a positive way because at the moment you come across as someone who is a hater rather than a fan.

Vocal Harmony You are wrong and i entirely agree with Freddie Jupiter with his post, Brian is losing the plot and doing odd things out of character.
He dis not own that Gym so he had NO right to demand the music be changed, and he had NO right to tell the camera man to turn it off when he is in a different country
and he is rock star touring there. Respect is what Mr May needs to find instead of bullying others.
He is ready to fall or have a nervous breakdown very soon.

ST16 wrote:


He dis not own that Gym so he had NO right to demand the music be changed, and he had NO right to tell the camera man to turn it off when he is in a different country . . . .

Your right he doesn't own the Gym, but that's no reason for him to ask politely if someone could turn off what they were playing, what ever they chose to do is up to them.

Regarding the camera man, the parents of those fans certainly don't agree with you or the camera man , and it certainly wasn't a different country to those fans.

The problem is that we live in a world where the media has the belief of self entitlement and that guy had no real care for those fans. He was going to film everything regardless.

Are you saying that they had equal right in London at Gerden lodge? They were asked several times not to intrude. It took Elton John blocking the road with his Bentley and "having words" for them to back off for a short amount of time.

The episod with Brian could have been avoided after that guy got some footage and was asked not to carry on filming.

@Vocal Harmony Garden Lodge was an entirely different situation where the camera men were zooming in on Freddie's windows which yes is out of order, with Brian he was on the street in public therefore he has no right to demand anything at all.
If i went to a gym and asked if they could turn the music off i am sure they would tell me to do one, so its no different for Brian.

Again, more mental gymnastics to rationalise that which cannot be rationalised.

It's very simple. It's not illegal to film anybody in a public place in Australia. Brian certainly can ask a cameramen to stop filming, but the cameraman is not compelled by law to stop, and has a right to refuse to comply with Brian's request.

What Brian has no right to do is try to coerce a cameraman to stop filming just because it happens to be Inconvenient for him; it doesn't work that way.

Certainly Brian broke the law by making threatening remarks and slapping the phone out of his hand.

As far as the hotel incident is concerned, he was just being a dick there. No laws were broken there.

Freddie Jupiter wrote:
It's very simple. It's not illegal to film anybody in a public place in Australia. Brian certainly can ask a cameramen to stop filming, but the cameraman is not compelled by law to stop, and has a right to refuse to comply with Brian's request.

What Brian has no right to do is try to coerce a cameraman to stop filming just because it happens to be Inconvenient for him; it doesn't work that way.

As far as the hotel incident is concerned, he was just being a dick there. No laws were broken there.

wrong again: the actual Australian Law by definition states:

Even if you’re filming somewhere where it is perfectly legal, your conduct may amount to a criminal offence if it is disruptive to others. Here are a few tips that may help you determine whether or not to hit the record button in Australia:

Alternatively, if you’re filming for financial gain or for a business, then you are filming for a commercial purpose.If you’re filming for a commercial purpose, you may need to obtain permission from the people who will be in your footage...[/i]

@Brenski Did you google that lol because we all know at that time of the night you are wasted!

brenski, what is this cherry picked bullshit you've posted. i know the law and it's not illegal to be filmed in public. There are some circumstances where you might need to obtain permission from the council but not from the person being filmed.

It's true that you're not allowed to be intrusive and stalk people, but the cameraman was not doing any of that.

Just accept already that Brian was in the wrong. Why is that so hard for you to do?

ST16 wrote:

@Brenski Did you google that lol because we all know at that time of the night you are wasted!

It probably would've taken him a minute to find that. No more time than it takes for you to write some of your posts!

Freddie Jupiter wrote:

brenski, what is this cherry picked bullshit you've posted. i know the law and it's not illegal to be filmed in public. There are some circumstances where you might need to obtain permission from the council but not from the person being filmed.

It's true that you're not allowed to be intrusive and stalk people, but the cameraman was not doing any of that.

Just accept already that Brian was in the wrong. Why is that so hard for you to do?

The cameramen didn't have Brian's permission, what don't you understand about that?

Young Music Fan wrote:

Freddie Jupiter wrote:

brenski, what is this cherry picked bullshit you've posted. i know the law and it's not illegal to be filmed in public. There are some circumstances where you might need to obtain permission from the council but not from the person being filmed.

It's true that you're not allowed to be intrusive and stalk people, but the cameraman was not doing any of that.

Just accept already that Brian was in the wrong. Why is that so hard for you to do?

The cameramen didn't have Brian's permission, what don't you understand about that?

He explained... it’s not illegal to film people. It is illegal to do what Brian did. He would have been arrested here in the USA for simple assault if the guy had wrote out a report... I’m guessing in Australia, he didn’t write one out.

That’s the issue, no matter how much you wish Brian was in the right, but as soon Brian touched that man’s phone, he was in the wrong.

Mister cosmic. Same in Australia. Obciously the cameraman did not press charges (probably too busy trying to make ends meet and pay off his massive mortgage and feed his children) otherwise Brian would be in a world of pain right now.

Freddie Jupiter wrote:
brenski, what is this cherry picked bullshit you've posted. i know the law and it's not illegal to be filmed in public. There are some circumstances where you might need to obtain permission from the council but not from the person being filmed.

It's true that you're not allowed to be intrusive and stalk people, but the cameraman was not doing any of that.

Just accept already that Brian was in the wrong. Why is that so hard for you to do?

i didn't say that it's illegal. i made it clear that it's illegal to film to use for financial gain (he works for a TV company) without obtaining permission from those being filmed. Now in most instances - with public figures, permission is a given. However, where that figure states an objection, then permission is withdrawn. he carried on filming despite the initial request. therefore his filming was illegal.
if YOU can't see that, then YOU have a problem.

brENsKi wrote: [color=red]Posted: 02 Mar 20, 07:18[/color]wrong again: the actual Australian Law by definition states:
Even if you’re filming somewhere where it is perfectly legal, your conduct may amount to a criminal offence if it is disruptive to others. Here are a few tips that may help you determine whether or not to hit the record button in Australia:
Alternatively, if you’re filming for financial gain or for a business, then you are filming for a commercial purpose.If you’re filming for a commercial purpose, you may need to obtain permission from the people who will be in your footage...[/i]

ST16 wrote: [color=red]Posted: 02 Mar 20, 07:22[/color][color=blue]@Brenski Did you google that lol because we all know at that time of the night you are wasted![/color]

so being [color=purple]unable to tell the time[/color][/i] is yet another way you parade your immense ineptitude?
i posted that @ 7:18 this morning, and YOU replied 4 minutes later...which only indicates what we all knew all along. you have no idea what time or day of the week it is.