Robbie Williams now asserts he was asked to become new Queen lead singer

@AlbaNo1:

Sorry, I shouldn't have lumped you in with aristide1 and runner_70, that was a mistake on my part. I don't think you're a troll, so I apologize for inappropriately calling you one.


I frequently think that Brenski is madder than a hatter on LSD and more wrong than a Boris Johnson nudie calendar (then I grudgingly find myself agreeing with him about music), but I really don't think he's a bully. I think a fair point can be made for curmudgeon, but I would have to ask him to send us a video of him chasing those damn kids off his lawn before we can say anything definite about that.

[QUOTE] [b]QE2. wrote:[/b]Brenski i have Not had 5 of my user names banned that is a lie and i have not had three whole pages banning my comments, you are a Walter Mitty character always making things up to make yourself look like the victim like you always do abusing people over there command of English and spelling mistakes which is damned well rude.
For your information there is more people on this site who are damned well more rude than me, and strange how they get away with abusing people but you do not pick them up do you?
If you and your other half Vocal Harmony where less opinionated we would not have any rows on here in the first place.
Let the people have there say instead of ruining the thread like you always do with YOUR rants.
You say you are a nice guy yet you have still not apologised calling me a liar over that Milton Keynes concert where there was street lamps in the distance of Roger's drums,
i provided a photo to prove that but you still have not said sorry.
If you play nice i do but i do NOT tolerate bullies lightly or anyone who thinks they can get one over on me.[/QUOTE]

yet again Gerry. you don't want peace.
read the last sentence of my previous post...and yet you still react in this manner. you're making yourself look foolish.

when people extend an offer of a truce - returning it with another argument is not the best thing to do. it shows that there's a desire to keep fighting. it'd be refreshing to say, okay then "bygones, and all that".

i'll leave it to you - as I have Alba...i'm out of rowing with you. peace could break out - but ONLY if you want it to.

if someone disagrees with you - replying calling them a tw*t or c*nt is bound to warrant retaliation.
as i said - no abuse and you won't get any back. but that does not exclude disagreement...but disagreement can be civil. your choice, gerry.

dbl post

[QUOTE] [b]QE2. wrote:[/b]

If you and your other half Vocal Harmony where less opinionated we would not have any rows on here in the first place. . . . [/QUOTE]

Explain this quote.

[QUOTE] [b]QE2. wrote:[/b]Brenski i have Not had 5 of my user names banned that is a lie and i have not had three whole pages banning my comments,[/QUOTE]

you need to learn to read what i typed. i said three whole pages of your posts deleted by moderator. read on for proof.
i really didn't want to do this, but in replying to someone else in another thread, i've just noticed it used to be almost three pages longer until today - when more posts were added. page count = 29, actual thread content = slightly less than 27 pages.
your posts were removed from this thread:
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1502608/were-you-ever-mocked-at-school-for-liking-queen.aspx?page=1
where your Happystar account was removed - all "his" posts were deleted upon his removal. all that remains to reference you is the occasional quote/reply from other

your "Jazz= / 100%" account was deleted and his posts removed from this thread - 2 pages worth
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1577498/freddie-was-a-brave-.aspx?page=5

that's four pages worth in total - without having to search.

and i'm not going to go searching - because challenging me to do so will escalate another row, and i don't want any more with you, and more importantly - could turn up even more of your "removals".
but since you claim otherwise; here - for clarity are (most of) your accounts - by status:
[b]CURRENT USERNAME: [color=blue]red**[/color]
DELETED/REMOVED ACCOUNTS: [color=purple]British Man[/color] [color=green]100%[/color] [color=blue]Jazz+[/color] [color=orange]happy_star[/color] [color=purple]rugbyguy[/color] [color=blue]Gerry[/color]
RANDOM NAME CHANGES: [color=red]Champagne Freddie[/color] [color=orange]SW17[/color] [color=purple]ST16[/color] [color=red]SW10[/color] [color=purple]QE2[/color] [color=red]Mr right[/color] [color=purple]Fat Bottomed Queen[/color] [color=green]ernie85017[/color] [color=blue]Mr Wight[/color] [color=orange]BETA2015[/color] [color=purple]JAZZ[/color] [color=red]BJOU[/color] [color=orange]EMI2565[/color] [color=lightblue]..... [/color] [color=orange]user1[/color] [color=red]Mr_Music[/color] [color=purple]ST17[/color] [color=green]Queen2[/color] [color=blue]BQT8[/color] [color=orange]QE2.[/color] [/b]

I'm happy to delete any you can prove are/were not you!

go do a search for them, you find only quotes/replies to them in the search results - which shows the accounts were deleted. you can't claim you changed their names - because your original posts would remain in the thread - they did not.

Brenski = 15+ years, no warnings, no removals, no account deletions
Gerry = 5 years, over 20 usernames, 5 account deletions, at least four pages of posts removed (probably more)

if you're still going to row about this then you're on thin ice...because only a small number EVER get banned here.
so you managing that more than once says a lot.

you likely will come back insulting me again - or disputing the above, because that's what you do - even though accepting the inevitable would be the sensible thing here.
i won't reply to you. this post will serve as proof - at least others (if not Gerry) will know and understand who the liar/fantasist is.
you can repeatedly change your name, gerry, but you can't delete the whole internet...links above dispel any retort you come back with.

cue denial...

You do realize that your name-change also shows up for your old posts, right?

[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]You do realize that your name-change also shows up for your old posts, right?[/QUOTE]
Percy Blakeney he certainly isn't. Much more akin to Lord Percy Percy.

I like RW but thank god he never became Queen's singer.
RW is great entertainer, but a very bad vocalist

I like RW but thank god he never became Queen's singer.
RW is great entertainer, but a very bad vocalist

[QUOTE] [b]red** wrote:[/b]

ThomasQuinn I am rock royalty on here have you not noticed?
Sure my name changes are as popular as Adam Lambert dinning out with Vladimir Putin lol



[/QUOTE]

Mr Red, could you explain this latest incarnation of your original Gerry character.

Are you now a traffic light, a lamp in a window in Amsterdam, a Martin Mac Viper with a Jamed colour scroll index that only allows use of that one colour, are you a navigation light on the tail of an aircraft or the side of a ship.

Maybe you're not a light, maybe you're the umbrella term used to identify a particular political party or way of political thinking.

Maybe your a sign signifying danger. . .

You might even be a King Crimson album

Please do explain who you now are.