Still no discussion about the topic? I find that very strange given the hard time I recieved for allegedly derailing the topic by posting off topic and childish things. I left it alone for nearly two days and let's face it it's been far from lively here. What's wrong guys?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Freddie Jupiter wrote:
Still no discussion about the topic? I find that very strange given the hard time I recieved for allegedly derailing the topic by posting off topic and childish things. I left it alone for nearly two days and let's face it it's been far from lively here. What's wrong guys?
It's hard to isolate any valid points within the playground taunting, so hardly surprising that nobody tries.
Once you've fucked up the thread, it doesn't un-fuck up.
It does un-fuck very easily. All you have to do is grab it by the balls and post a gem of a post that will make it irresistible for people not to respond to and contribute. That's all that's required.
So quit making excuses and just do it. Or are you yet another intellectually dishonest poster here? Because if you are I will very quickly expose your intellectual dishonesty for all to see, since I despise intellectual dishonesty in all its forms.
So quit making excuses and just do it. Or are you yet another intellectually dishonest poster here? Because if you are I will very quickly expose your intellectual dishonesty for all to see, since I despise intellectual dishonesty in all its forms.
You have given several examples of intellectual dishonesty *in this thread alone*. You 'knowing' that a certain scene in the movie "didn't happen" (despite the fact that you have no way of knowing that one way or the other) and going on a crazy spree about that, posting repeated personal attacks against various people, then claiming you're not derailing the topic, claiming that your beliefs are "the truth" despite being unable to back them up with ANY reliable sources.
And YOU feel the need to use the term "intellectual dishonesty" three times in a four-line post? You must be extremely irony-impaired.
And YOU feel the need to use the term "intellectual dishonesty" three times in a four-line post? You must be extremely irony-impaired.
I know it didn't happen and I didn't have to be there to know that.
And even if it had happened, there is no way that I would have included it in what was supposed to be a biopic about Freddie Mercury because it would be extremely demeaning to Freddie Mercury.
End of story.
And even if it had happened, there is no way that I would have included it in what was supposed to be a biopic about Freddie Mercury because it would be extremely demeaning to Freddie Mercury.
End of story.
Freddie Jupiter wrote:
I know it didn't happen and I didn't have to be there to know that.
How do you know? I'm pretty sure Hideki Tojo didn't wear a tutu on his night off, but I cannot say with certainty "Tojo never wore a tutu".
And even if it had happened, there is no way that I would have included it in what was supposed to be a biopic about Freddie Mercury because it would be extremely demeaning to Freddie Mercury.
Ah, now it was a biopic about Freddie Mercury and not a biopic about Queen; not only that, it is meant to be a hagiography, because no event, even if it did happen, should be included if it was "demeaning to Freddie Mercury" (with you, obviously, being the judge of what is and isn't demeaning to Freddie Mercury)
End of story.
And, of course, a statement of self-appointed authority from the man with the top 0.1% IQ but little if any knowledge of how to establish historical facts or understanding of the simple fact that you cannot speak with authority when no one recognizes your authority, no matter how high your own opinion of yourself is.
Ok let's make a movie about Thomas Quinn begging Freddie Jupiter to be allowed to post his usual intellectually dishonest bullshit on the queenzone forum like a chastised worm. Would that be demeaning to Thomas Quinn?
Actually, don't answer that as I really don't give a shit given the amount of intellectual dishonesty you're prepared to spew forth to justify to yourself your swallowing of Brian's bullshit wholesale.
Actually, don't answer that as I really don't give a shit given the amount of intellectual dishonesty you're prepared to spew forth to justify to yourself your swallowing of Brian's bullshit wholesale.
There is a term for what you just wrote: non sequitur.
So it doesn't follow that it's reasonable to assume that any normal, mentally healthy human being would find it demeaning to be depicted in a subordinate role where they have to beg for something like a chastised schoolboy?
Stop consuming Brian's bullshit and stop being an intellectually dishonest dick.
Stop consuming Brian's bullshit and stop being an intellectually dishonest dick.
More non-sequitur. The fact that you have no evidence that a given scene did not take place does not mean that I accept "Brian's bullshit" as the gospel truth - the only intellectual dishonesty here is yours, in stacking false assumption upon false assumption and making deductions from that.
Whether or not something is "demeaning" is not now, nor was it ever, the subject of our discussion - more intellectual dishonesty on your part, and more indication that you desire a hagiography, not a biography. Now, as for the psychological implications of your utter obsession with "be[ing] depicted in a subordinate role", especially given the fact that you so frequently express a rather high opinion of yourself in both direct and indirect ways, *that* is a subject you might do well to consider. Of course, that would require the ability to look at your behaviour, personality and mental state in an analytical and self-critical fashion, which, purely on the basis of your posts, I am not sure you are capable of. Still, I think there's something to be gained for you there.
Whether or not something is "demeaning" is not now, nor was it ever, the subject of our discussion - more intellectual dishonesty on your part, and more indication that you desire a hagiography, not a biography. Now, as for the psychological implications of your utter obsession with "be[ing] depicted in a subordinate role", especially given the fact that you so frequently express a rather high opinion of yourself in both direct and indirect ways, *that* is a subject you might do well to consider. Of course, that would require the ability to look at your behaviour, personality and mental state in an analytical and self-critical fashion, which, purely on the basis of your posts, I am not sure you are capable of. Still, I think there's something to be gained for you there.
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
More non-sequitur. The fact that you have no evidence that a given scene did not take place does not mean that I accept "Brian's bullshit" as the gospel truth - the only intellectual dishonesty here is yours, in stacking false assumption upon false assumption and making deductions from that.
Whether or not something is "demeaning" is not now, nor was it ever, the subject of our discussion - more intellectual dishonesty on your part, and more indication that you desire a hagiography, not a biography. Now, as for the psychological implications of your utter obsession with "be[ing] depicted in a subordinate role", especially given the fact that you so frequently express a rather high opinion of yourself in both direct and indirect ways, *that* is a subject you might do well to consider. Of course, that would require the ability to look at your behaviour, personality and mental state in an analytical and self-critical fashion, which, purely on the basis of your posts, I am not sure you are capable of. Still, I think there's something to be gained for you there.
<a href="https://imgur.com/2rErG5y"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/2rErG5ym.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
@thomas Quinn, you intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest moron, I didn't not commit any non sequitur. Why the fuck you even bright that up is beyond me, except to further obfuscate and confuse so that you may win an argument no matter how intellectually dishonest.
Keep swallowing Brian's bullshit and keep living in a world of deceptions and falsehoods, just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media about the economy being bullet proof and how they should borrow more money, which they now can't pay back and require cash payer funded payouts from big daddy government.
The amount of corruption lies, deceptions and bullshit in the world astounds me. Enjoy the decline dipshit.
Keep swallowing Brian's bullshit and keep living in a world of deceptions and falsehoods, just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media about the economy being bullet proof and how they should borrow more money, which they now can't pay back and require cash payer funded payouts from big daddy government.
The amount of corruption lies, deceptions and bullshit in the world astounds me. Enjoy the decline dipshit.
Freddie Jupiter wrote:
@thomas Quinn, you intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest moron, I didn't not commit any non sequitur. Why the fuck you even bright that up is beyond me, except to further obfuscate and confuse so that you may win an argument no matter how intellectually dishonest.
Keep swallowing Brian's bullshit and keep living in a world of deceptions and falsehoods, just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media about the economy being bullet proof and how they should borrow more money, which they now can't pay back and require cash payer funded payouts from big daddy government.
The amount of corruption lies, deceptions and bullshit in the world astounds me. Enjoy the decline dipshit.
Wow. There is so much wrong with that post. I'll just take the most disturbing part:
...just like all those economic corona virus victims who <B>instead of listening to me</B> listened to the lies...
That is a whole lot of crazy going on there, Mr. Egomaniac a.k.a. "I'm in the top 0.1% IQ".
Enjoy the decline you intellectually dishonest half-wit, with all the other intellectually dishonest half-wit sheeple. Keep making ad hominem attacks, keep lying, keep obfuscating, keep higlighting irrelevant part of quotes and await the inevitable outcome.
@Thomsd Quinn, BTW have you managed to grasp what a non sequitur is, or would you like me to explain it to you, you dumbass.