Intresting read about Live Aid Multitracks

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]Brenski you half-wit, either point out the non sequitur that your intellectually dishonest, fascist friend Thomas Quinn accused me of making, or piss off and stop being an intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest prick.
[/QUOTE]

so make up your mind, Mr Jupiter. do you want to be Gerry or Mr Weckwerth?
because one minute you behave exactly like Gerry, and the next you could be runner_70's identical twin.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]I don't give a shit who you think I am because it's irrelevant to the discussion.[/QUOTE]

wrong again. it's 100% relevant to the discussion. it goes toward arming us with the knowledge as to which of your many *characters* we're dealing with on any given day.

So 1) you don't know what a non sequitur is 2) you don't know what fascism means 3) you don't know what intellectual integrity means 4) your epistemology skills are frankly terrible.

Perhaps you should re-read my second to last post, as I already did. No amount of self-obsessed chest thumping on your part is going to change anything.

Also, you should realize that your own high opinion of yourself is not widely shared. Therefore, you shouldn't expect your half-witted attempts at orders to be obeyed.

Again, I already pointed it out. If you're too stupid to be able to re-read earlier posts, I'll spell it out for you - you claimed that a certain scene in the biopic did not happen. I stated that you cannot know whether or not it happened because you have no evidence one way or the other (basic epistemology), to which you replied by accusing me of the "swallowing of Brian's bullshit wholesale.", which does not in any way follow from what I wrote, making it a non sequitur. It really isn't that difficult.

I'd like to point out the hysterical irony of you saying "your accusation that I was intellectually dishonest", when you are seemingly incapable of writing a single post without accusing people of "intellectual dishonesty", the two most frequently used words in your vocabulary. Interestingly, the way in which you use the term strongly suggests that you have a very deficient grasp of its meaning. Similar to how you are incapable of understanding the basics of epistemology.

Actually, you have attempted to claim that it isn't a non sequitur, you have accidentally written that it is, and you have not offered any explanation or argument to support your position.

Here's what you, hilariously, wrote:

[QUOTE]I didn't not commit any non sequitur. [/QUOTE]

No explanation or argument there. Nothing of any substance in the rest of the post either, just a further hissy fit about Brian May and a deranged rant about how "all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media", combining your predilection for ultra right wing politics with your extremely inflated sense of self.

Please note that I am not accusing you of intellectual dishonesty - I believe that you simply aren't capable of understanding why what you're writing is completely fallacious.

Look, you can keep insisting that a non sequitur is a non sequitur as much as you like, but it's not going to convince anyone who isn't you. Also, you're very repetitive and whiny, so I'm going to leave it at this. If you still don't understand, maybe you can get someone to read it out to you slowly and, if necessary, explain it to you in simple English.

"epistomolgy". LOL.

Incredible. After failing pathetically not only in persuasively making your argument or even reproducing accurately what has been written right here, within the confines of this thread, you are now also, apparently, under the deluded impression that you have a say in whether or not I am going to further discuss the subject with you. Utterly bizarre.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]It really isn't that difficult a concert to grasp. In fact, even a primary school student with an average IQ is able to [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]It really isn't that difficult a conce[b][color=red]p[/color][/b]t to grasp. In fact, even a primary school student with an average IQ is able to spell "concept"[/QUOTE]

FIFY

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]@ Brenski, I told you before; I don't need an intellectually deficient halfwit who can't grasp a single primary school concept to fix anything for me.

By the way Brenski, if you're such a spelling champion how come you've got capital letters in the middle of a word. Even a primary school kid knows that you can't have capitals in the middle of a word. [/QUOTE]

well i t looks like you did. an absolute pleasure to help you.

what word has captials in the middle?

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

Your name BrENsKi. The E, N and K are capitals, are they not? [/QUOTE]

you let yourself down. for someone who claims to be so "intelligent", even by your standards - it's a pretty piss-poor showing.
brENsKi is a name. (oh yeah - try typing it correctly).
somehow - idiot that you are - you were not aware that this is a perfectly acceptable practice for names:
eBay, iPod, QuarkXPress aRMadillo online, CompuServe to name a few.

with names - anything goes - there's whole ranges of conventions created for this express purpose: (included - but not limited to)
bicapitlatization, camelCase, embedded caps, midcaps, incaps and - in the instance of my username - intercaps (internal capitalization)

again, you are found wanting. it's not just ThomasQuinn who runs rings around you. you got this so wrong. but rather than admit it, you'll (very predictably) divert off into some other unrelated cul-de-sac.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]You should not use capital letters in the middle if words. All those examples are just stupid inventions made by idiots for other idiots. [/QUOTE]

maybe in your world, Mr Weckwerth!

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

You should not use capital letters in the middle if words. All those examples are just stupid inventions made by idiots for other idiots.

Are you an idiot BrENski? Or are you a brand name -- a brand name for stupidity perhaps? [/QUOTE]

The Circle of Eidolon has viewed your posts and arguments Freddie Jupiter.

Rather than casting everyone, with intelligence, in your hateful shadows maybe you should look at your own reflection.

You call someone an idiot, but the truth is you are an idiot, a pure creation an idiot who fuels his own idiocy.

A simple lesson for a simple mind. When you're dead you don't know you're dead. When you're an idiot the same rule applies

Learn from this Freddie Jupiter.

The Circle of Eidolon has spoken, there is no argument.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

Oh look, another intellectually deficient, intellectually dishonest moron. Why are you attacking me you hateful moron, when Brenski and Thomas Quinn have demonstrated a level of intellectual dishonesty the likes of which I have never seen before?

Why are you choosing the side of intellectual dishonesty you prick, why are you resorting to ad hominems?

Piss off with your pseudo intellectual bullshit, and quit wasting my time. [/QUOTE]

We The Circle of Eidolon explained your position in our original post.

You Freddie Jupiter, in your attempt at a reply, simply proved what The Circle of Eidolon has already said.

We also told you we had spoken and there is no argument. You in your world of idiocy seem unable to understand this, again demonstrating to the world that in which you are swamped you do not see.

Unable to learn, and continue to insult. Let the world see the real you.

We The Circle of Eidolon are aware you will learn nothing from this, but know that we have spoken and you are drifting in an endless sea with no sail and no compass, without the knowledge to find yourself.

The Circle of Eidolon has spoken.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
. . . . . Maybe then you'll have my attention, and maybe, just maybe, I'll read your pointless drivel.

Also if you have a point to make, make it now. . . .
[/QUOTE]

We The Circle of Eidolon already have your attention.

You Freddie Jupiter have already read what we say

We The Circle of Eidolon made our point in our first post. The contents of which seem to have already escaped your capacity to retain.

Yet again given the facts that there is no argument, following our teaching, you have persisted showing yourself to be shallow, shallow of understanding and acceptance.

If you stand next to a running stream you can not touch the same water repeatedly, once it has past it is past. Stop trying to reach for the water that's gone.

Yet again we The Circle of Eidolon have spoken to someone who's understands even less than he is aware of.

Say what you will, yet again there is no argument. We The Circle of Eidolon are secure in what we say, that which is understood needs no further discussion.

Freddie Jupiter, you have said everything, it amounts to nothing.