Intresting read about Live Aid Multitracks

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

And what shit am I talking? The last thing I said about Freddie being most likely the person to mobilise the troops into action is corroborated by many different sources, including Deacy and Roger, if I remember correctly.

Why doesn't the movie feature Freddie doing exactly that, instead of begging Brian to be let back into queen like a chastised employee. I mean wouldn't that be more interesting and better for Freddie's reputation?

[/QUOTE]

And what does any of that shit have to do with the topic? Take your shit conversations somewhere where that topic has been discussed at length before. This subject was about the Live Aid multi tracks. Can you not see why we're all getting so fucken annoyed?

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

Really? Where were you when Brenski was clogging all of my threads with his accusations that I'm Gerry? Did that have anything to do with the topic?

Besides, the thread is still wide open, so feel free to go ahead and discuss the topic. I shall be waiting impatiently to read your gem of a contribution. [/QUOTE]

And on it goes!! "He did this", "She did that"! You're a fuckwit! In case you didn't notice this isn't your thread, it's not Brenski's thread so take your shit elsewhere!

Please just fuck off with this shit! Grow some balls, suck it up and move on!

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

@macca, I'm still waiting for you to grab this thread by the balls and put it back on track. [/QUOTE]

Seriously, whoever salvaged you by scraping you off the side of an abortion bucket needs a bullet! Will you just fuck off!!

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

@Big Mac, yet again, nothing to do with the topic.

Are you going to post something on the topic or not?

I'm getting very impatient.

[/QUOTE]

I'd like to take all 730 metres of that multi track tape and wrap it around you're fucken neck! Is that on topic enough for you? Now piss off!

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

Bravo, that is so much better than the stuff I've been posting. And not to mention less childish.

The very guy who criticised me for posting childish and off topic posts has resorted to posting childish and off topic posts himself! How ironic.

And no, I will not pisss off until I see a gem of a post from you that is both on topic and not childish.[/QUOTE]

My previous post was on topic, I spoke about the 2 inch tape being of a length of 730 metres. Now seriously mate, you have to move on and just stop with this shit. Everyone that is constantly doing the same shit just has to stop. Every thread is just turned into the same tedious shit. It's tiresome and boring and those that want to use the forum for what it's purpose is are just giving up. Shit even Reddit is better than here lately and that's saying something.

Now come on mate, give it a break!

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

Still no discussion about the topic? I find that very strange given the hard time I recieved for allegedly derailing the topic by posting off topic and childish things. I left it alone for nearly two days and let's face it it's been far from lively here. What's wrong guys?[/QUOTE]

It's hard to isolate any valid points within the playground taunting, so hardly surprising that nobody tries.

Once you've fucked up the thread, it doesn't un-fuck up.

You have given several examples of intellectual dishonesty *in this thread alone*. You 'knowing' that a certain scene in the movie "didn't happen" (despite the fact that you have no way of knowing that one way or the other) and going on a crazy spree about that, posting repeated personal attacks against various people, then claiming you're not derailing the topic, claiming that your beliefs are "the truth" despite being unable to back them up with ANY reliable sources.

And YOU feel the need to use the term "intellectual dishonesty" three times in a four-line post? You must be extremely irony-impaired.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

I know it didn't happen and I didn't have to be there to know that. [/QUOTE]

How do you know? I'm pretty sure Hideki Tojo didn't wear a tutu on his night off, but I cannot say with certainty "Tojo never wore a tutu".

[QUOTE]And even if it had happened, there is no way that I would have included it in what was supposed to be a biopic about Freddie Mercury because it would be extremely demeaning to Freddie Mercury. [/QUOTE]

Ah, now it was a biopic about Freddie Mercury and not a biopic about Queen; not only that, it is meant to be a hagiography, because no event, even if it did happen, should be included if it was "demeaning to Freddie Mercury" (with you, obviously, being the judge of what is and isn't demeaning to Freddie Mercury)

[QUOTE]End of story. [/QUOTE]

And, of course, a statement of self-appointed authority from the man with the top 0.1% IQ but little if any knowledge of how to establish historical facts or understanding of the simple fact that you cannot speak with authority when no one recognizes your authority, no matter how high your own opinion of yourself is.

There is a term for what you just wrote: non sequitur.

More non-sequitur. The fact that you have no evidence that a given scene did not take place does not mean that I accept "Brian's bullshit" as the gospel truth - the only intellectual dishonesty here is yours, in stacking false assumption upon false assumption and making deductions from that.

Whether or not something is "demeaning" is not now, nor was it ever, the subject of our discussion - more intellectual dishonesty on your part, and more indication that you desire a hagiography, not a biography. Now, as for the psychological implications of your utter obsession with "be[ing] depicted in a subordinate role", especially given the fact that you so frequently express a rather high opinion of yourself in both direct and indirect ways, *that* is a subject you might do well to consider. Of course, that would require the ability to look at your behaviour, personality and mental state in an analytical and self-critical fashion, which, purely on the basis of your posts, I am not sure you are capable of. Still, I think there's something to be gained for you there.

[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b] More non-sequitur. The fact that you have no evidence that a given scene did not take place does not mean that I accept "Brian's bullshit" as the gospel truth - the only intellectual dishonesty here is yours, in stacking false assumption upon false assumption and making deductions from that. Whether or not something is "demeaning" is not now, nor was it ever, the subject of our discussion - more intellectual dishonesty on your part, and more indication that you desire a hagiography, not a biography. Now, as for the psychological implications of your utter obsession with "be[ing] depicted in a subordinate role", especially given the fact that you so frequently express a rather high opinion of yourself in both direct and indirect ways, *that* is a subject you might do well to consider. Of course, that would require the ability to look at your behaviour, personality and mental state in an analytical and self-critical fashion, which, purely on the basis of your posts, I am not sure you are capable of. Still, I think there's something to be gained for you there.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b] @thomas Quinn, you intellectually deficient and intellectually dishonest moron, I didn't not commit any non sequitur. Why the fuck you even bright that up is beyond me, except to further obfuscate and confuse so that you may win an argument no matter how intellectually dishonest. Keep swallowing Brian's bullshit and keep living in a world of deceptions and falsehoods, just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies from big daddy government and the media about the economy being bullet proof and how they should borrow more money, which they now can't pay back and require cash payer funded payouts from big daddy government. The amount of corruption lies, deceptions and bullshit in the world astounds me. Enjoy the decline dipshit. [/QUOTE] Wow. There is so much wrong with that post. I'll just take the most disturbing part: [QUOTE] ...just like all those economic corona virus victims who instead of listening to me listened to the lies... [/QUOTE] That is a whole lot of crazy going on there, Mr. Egomaniac a.k.a. "I'm in the top 0.1% IQ".

Non sequitur, literally "[it] does not follow", a conclusion or reply that does not follow logically from the previous statement. For instance, your 'conclusion' "Stop consuming Brian's bullshit" as a reply to the statement that you cannot say for certain that you know a given thing did not happen if you don't have any evidence for it not having happened.

It strikes me that there is a direct connection between the amount of profanity you spew and the degree to which you left without a leg to stand on in a discussion. Lashing out wildly when challenged is another symptom of what is quickly starting to look a whole lot like narcissistic personality disorder on your part. You might want to have that looked into in the future.

Are we really still talking about nobodies/trolls!? This is seriously so fucking ridiculous! EVERYONE just ignore them! The more you talk to these idiots the more they will keep opening their mouths with bullshit that no one cares about!

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]If I kick my friend in the balls and he doesn't like it, and then I kick my other 2 friends in the balls and they don't like it, I can safely conclude that Freddie Mercury wouldn't like it if I kicked him in the balls. [/QUOTE]

has someone kicked you (very hard) in the balls? because you talk like you've had a brain trauma.