M. V. Ahundova's book "The Real Freddie Mercury".

Actually, I read the book for myself. Crap!

>>Yes, but Latin is Latin, it is not English or something else. <<
As far as I know, Galileo Figaro Magnifico is not an English Words too.

>>And I have no idea if someone else on QOL says the same things. And I simply don't care. These are my words. <<<
I didn't say that You've took your ideas from QOL - this words were dedicated to another guy!

>>>And where exactly in the Bible please?<<<
Ahh... well... you know, I'm not a specialist... The only thing I can help - I can use google:) I've just input "Jesus+Galilean+Bible". So, here is a link: http://www.studybibleforum.com/htm_php.php3?do=show_marg_and_gh&b=40&c=26&v=69#1057

It doesn't work.

Is all you can really find from the book about "hate towards gay people? and explanations for galileos" ?? If I remember right.. there were hell of a lot stuff about freddie's childhood in Zanzibar, and the explanation what happened to his personality and "becoming the gay himself" after being assaulted by those pederats in boarding school. Other stuff I found newly interesting was the way the author defends freddie's memory right up till the end against the press, and those other biography writers who only sees him being the gay icon of the 80'. She's not actually promoting hatred for gay people, but to those who only sees freddie as gay and his legacy as product of mad gaymans' megalomaniac goals in commanding his life in his flamboyant style. Other authors doesnt recognize the person behind the phenomenom.. Ahundova does, its another issue how deep and correct she is in her analyzation about the real FM.

In fact, she admits freddie being gay.. and that homosexualism is something universal and exists, and freddie "was" one of them due to those factors that affected his personality in his early stages". but he was also bi-sexual to some degree, thinking about his relation to mary that lasted those 7 yrs.. I believe like ahundova says that the real freddie could have only really love women, because women reflected better to his complex emotional needs.. He never really loved any of his male lovers in the same way as female-lovers. males were rather just physical amusement and friends for him.. since males are not generally as developed emotionally. altough born gay males tend to have better birthable emotional readiness. It's something genetically.

Yeah.. thats all folks for now..

Ps. Sorry for my poor english.. Im finnish and thus I reserve the right to be imperfect.

Nazareth is in the province of Galilee. And of course, Jesus was brought up and raised as a boy in Nazareth (see Matthew 2:23)

"Galileo Figaro Magnifico" InDeEd means "Magnify the Galilean figure". It's just mispronounced / miswritten. It appears in the same context with "Beelzebub", which we know is Satan name. If Satan is in game, does that mean Jesus cannot show up?
Jesus Christ name appears in a few Queen Lyrics, like 'Bicycle Race' and 'Jesus'.
There must be some sort of outrageous Jesus hater to deny the obvious.

My opinion: Ahundova was 200% right in 'Bohemian Rhapsody' text interpretation. It's a flash of insight. As well as she has good points at Queen Lyrics research in general. I don't agree with her 100% but she's definitely worth reading.

I think it's rather abhorrent that we are talking "genuine ideas" when what we are really talking about a fear and hatred of gay people. For far too long, many Queen fans have been reluctant to admit that Freddie was a gay man. Just so people are up to speed, here's three of the loopholes:

-- He had a girlfriend. yes many gay men did/do, and there are many who have wives/beards all their lives).

-- He didn't sing about men. This is debatable, as people have pointed out in this thread. But not writing gender-specific lyrics doesn't get one off the gay hook (c.f., Elton John, Bowie, Jagger, Townshend, Shakespeare, Lou Reed, Sappho, Joan Armatrading, Melissa Etheridge, Frank O'Hara, Walt Whitman). (Sorry about that phrase "gay hook.")

-- That he wasn't "out," therefor he wasn't gay. I love this one. You can look the above list for people who are not "out" but who have had gay period or who are gay. But I think if Freddie himself came down or came back and said, "I am a gay man," it wouldn't be enough proof for some.

People with more than 2 brain cells won't waste their time on this horrible piece of crap. It does not deserve a serious discussion.

Not every 'Gay' goes to 'Heaven', read if you wanna know what I mean :-)))

I loved it :D

I seen that, it is some real crazy shit ,
totally nuts!!!

http://allofqueen.on.ufanet.ru/book/chapter7.html

This is a quite good chapter U_U

[QUOTE]

[b]Sicmot wrote: [/b] I dare to defend M.V Avhundovas opinions.. he's done very deep and throughly researches.. instead of those poof biography authors.. he named a few.. Its easy for you to smash his genuine ideas down, since you too have nothing else to scoop than those dozens of profound biogs to base your assimilated thoughts.. [/QUOTE]

Sorry? Deep and thorough research? I read one paragraph and found this:

[b]"And in Australia, there’s a man who publicly called Queen a Christian group. The
aforementioned Robin Gamble, the vicar of Anglican church of St. Augustine in
Melbourne, uses Queen’s music in the church masses. In the interview to the
influential Australian magazine Age he called Freddie Mercury a rock singer who
asked the most serious questions about the meaning of life and death..."[/b]

Now, two things, firstly- Robin Gamble is an English Vicar and is an evangelist in Bradford England (oh, and he's English) Always lived in England and even opened a Christain pub there at one point. He does however, use the music of Queen as an inspiration (don't we all).  

Secondly, "Age" isn't an influential Australian magazine at all ...it's actually called The Age and it's a bloody newspaper! The only passage I read and two factual errors. Doesn't sound like a worthwhile read to me (unless fiction is your thing).

I think it's a she.

Oh, Dear. I swore not to get into serious discussions here when I registered; my excuse is this apparently isn’t one.

I can’t resist objecting when people talk badly about fanfic writers; and this is what you guys do. There is only one major principle of fan fiction: the destination of popular culture is to please fans so fan fiction just takes the freedom to interpret popular culture in the way it pleases most. It’s sex for some and for others it’s religion. What’s the problem, then?
I know what you’d say: if this is a fanfic, it should have a disclaimer. However, unauthorized biographies don’t have other disclaimers than being unauthorized biographies; and – face the fact! - they are but socially acceptable fanfics. If homophobia and conspiracy theories are socially acceptable in Russia (I’ve got a maybe wrong impression that they are) then this particular piece of writing is an unauthorized biography in Russia. When it goes viral internationally where it’s not acceptable socially, it’s simply a fanfic. This is what happens when popular culture tends to please fans worldwide.

We all have opinions but let’s not get hypocritical: if you like broad-mindedness then show some. Was it some “frian” or “froger” gay porn would you also go like “how dare she”? Well, this one is anti-gay. So what? It’s freedom of speech. Ask Eminem XD or just… have patience or choose better literature XD

[QUOTE] [b]Saffron Caribou wrote:[/b]

3. Freddie dying from AIDS was basically an agenda from the Gay Mafia. Proclaiming that the Gay Mafia KILLED Freddie, not literally of course.
[/QUOTE]

Delusional. Freddie liked gay sex more than Garfield likes lasagna and I couldn't possibly care less about his sexuality.