M. V. Ahundova's book "The Real Freddie Mercury".

Skimming over this thread without investing myself too much, otherwise I'll get angry :P

I have no idea who or what the thread is about, but one look at the name M. V. Ahundova tells me they're full of shit and shouldn't have any attention paid to them.

This shit still around?

I think many queenzoners could write a better fan-fiction autobiography, make it even more ridiculous and far-fetched. Just keep it deadpan and be over the top.
Let's face it, Ahundova's book about Freddie completely ignores his love affair with John Deacon, and the fact that he fathered John's kids (Yes, he gave birth).

That’s it. If any of you smart cookies will bring this topic up again saying it’s not worth attention, I’ll write a serious review and post it in bold print so you can have two topics about M.V.Ahundova on the front page!

OK I may be exaggerating about the bold print but I mean it. This s[tuff] would never come to my attention if not your posting. Now I’m into reading it and I’m seriously angry. I don’t mind deviation but this is a long one to say the least. You better don’t push me!

I am reading the book and I recommend it to everybody. The truth is coming up.

To the ones that discredit the book without reading it and taking a few lines of it to demostrate the inaccuracy of the biography I tell you: who are you? you can lie to others, but not to me.

Too late my dears, I am aware of the massive campaign to confuse people so that we would not receive the messages that would rescue youth from the darkness.

I know that people have been paid to sustain the lie that Freddy was omosexual, promiscous, depraved and using drugs, and I am not surprised that in forum like this, about Queen, people continue to be paid to support the lie.

You do not talk like a fan of Queen would talk, you look like your only interest is to discredit this biography. A fan of Queen would be interested in reading the book, and surprised, maybe confused, but happy to see what a beautiful being Freddy was, a rare uncorruptable and with a big big heart fearless person, so big a heart that they took it for egocentrism. People who are egocentric themselves cannot understand people with a pure heart, they just are not able to recognize what pushes them to reach the masses. They believe it is for self-promotion, look at me I am so big. It is the opposite: follow me and you'll be free.

I recognize him because I am like him, there are people among humanity that have incarnated to help this world to find the way back home, back to the light, back to our real Father, back to who we really are, free from any slavery that the ones that control this world want to keep us in.

Freddy's mission was to reach the youth of western countries in danger. Save them from drugs, annihilation, give them a hope, a right goal to fight for. And I tell you this not because it is written in the biography, it is not written. I tell you this because I recognize it myself, by observing where he was born, the people which could give him an uncorruptable faith in God and from there move in the middle of the lost souls of England.

His shining cristalline, innocent and strong voice is a boost of life, a flash of light that clear all shadows, all fears.

I have been killed and persecuted in past lives for bringing the message of love and freedom, I am not surprised to discover he has also been persecuted, it did not take much to me to recognize the truth in Ahundova's word.

But his songs still shine many miles up in the atmosfhere of all the earth, and will continue to do so.

Look at this video, at the end of his life, before dying, when he was so full of pain that he could hardly stand up. See the light, see his serenity, see his love, that only can come from the deep connection with God that many have lost:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDUmT3wm-0A

I feel him looking on us now, with a smile and even more love

oh ffs ...

woah!

There's a [i]definite[/i] trend with people posting ridiculous shit also using 'dear', 'darling' etc in their writing, in some sort of weird homage to Freddie's mannerisms. I find it kind of creepy really.

[QUOTE] [b]Flores wrote:[/b]
Freddy[/QUOTE]

Freddie *

What utter crap though, seriously. I hold very different values than those Freddie did, but that doesn't drive me to come up with ridiculous, groundless theories about him really being a heterosexual, conservative Christian man. If you can't love him and what he created for who he is then go away, really. He would be insulted by people like you trying to justify their respect for him by blatantly lying to themselves.

What a load of bollocks this thread is.

Why would anybody give this book or anything about it the time of day, let alone read it.

Freddie was gay - get over it. He loved women and had a sexual relationship with Mary, most gay men have gone through the same scenario.
It's about finding your own identity, experimentation if you like. Heterosexual people go through it too if they have doubts as to who they really are.

Since Freddie died (and even when he was alive) many women have wished he was straight to fulfill their own desires for him.
The man was not for turning - get a life.

Freddie loved and had sex with other men because that was his preference. Nobody else's business.
He would be horrified at all this crap again.

lol...aha! Now you people are going to presume to "know" what Freddie would think/feel. You guys slam everyone for responding to the thread "Was Freddie a good person?" saying how in the world would anyone ever know but you come to this one and actually type that Freddie would think this or that? Where do you get the idea of what he would think? Oh..wait...all of our opinions of whether Freddie was good or bad...gay or not...come from the same sources...video of interviews of him, his bandmates, lovers, friends, ect... along with books written. Talk about being hypocritical! This board is amusing, I am here for amusement and if I learn something too..then great. The presumptious thinking only adds to my entertainment, thanks!

And people reckon this forum doesn't need me to moderate it. Pffffffff.

[QUOTE] [b]Belladonic haze wrote:[/b]

http://allofqueen.on.ufanet.ru/book/chapter7.html

This is a quite good chapter U_U[/QUOTE]


More about the author
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borat_Sagdiyev

" The only good news were that Queen were presented with the Britannia Award for Bohemian Rhapsody that was voted the best British single in 25 years. The critics unleashed another stream of hatred – how terrible, how those wretches could forget the all time geniuses Beatles and give the award to some upstarts! "
SO TRUE!!!!!!
BEAT THE BEATLES!


The hard fights of 1977 placed a stamp on the new album, News Of The World. Its cover was bringing the serious thoughts. The critics refused to comment the cover, saying only that the idea to picture a robot belonged to Roger Taylor, who’d seen a similar picture in an old sci-fi mag. And in all books about Queen and in the Internet sites, the cover is represented in cut down, and the entire cover can be seen only by the people who have a legal copy of the album at home. .
INSIGHT INTO THE TRUE MEANING OF THE NEWS OF THE WORLD ARTWORK

http://allofqueen.on.ufanet.ru/book/chapter7.html
SO TRUE!!

Something important happened. It’s not just a lucky year, there were many of those in Queen’s career – it’s the beginning of their reign. The mass Queenomania is storming all around the world, their albums, both new and old, are sold by millions in dozens of countries. Queen’s video clips are named among the best videos of UK and the entire world, Queen is solidly voted England’s national institute and the best group of 1986, and Freddie Mercury was the best vocalist. The Live In Rio video tops the charts and receives the award as the Best British Video. The slates in some newspapers don’t help – Queen fandom doesn’t get any smaller. The forbidding of Mercury’s solo video clip Living On My Own, accused in transvestitism, doesn’t help either – it became the free advertising for Mercury’s solo video EP that was sold in a few days and topped the charts. And the unreasoned refusal of British TV to show their video clips – and they were still shown at the cable channels. Though Queen are still ignored by the establishment, and they don’t get any prestigious awards – should they care? Their songs are sung everywhere, and their enormous popularity even without any vulgar awards and medals makes their enemies cry at nights. Freddie is started to be openly called the King of Rock – first by one newspaper, then by the second, third… The events look more and more like the events of 1963 – the time when the Beatles-mania began…

In the album A Kind Of Magic, the theme of confrontation notably comes into the theme of the early triumph – in the song Don’t Lose Your Head, it’s said, “Don’t lose your way, don’t lose your head, remember – love’s stronger, love conquers all… If you make it to the top and you wanna stay alive – don’t lose your head.” And in the aforementioned Princes Of The Universe Mercury says about himself as the future King of Rock who will come through everything, pass all trials – and get his throne.

In Summer, the most grandiose European tour in Queen’s history took place – the Magic Tour. Queen’s performances were always popular, but there never was anything similar to what was happening in that 1986 Summer.

elvis MAY BE THE kING oF rOCK 'N' rOLL
But who else IS THE KING OF ROCK
other than FREDDIE MERCURY ?

iN A UNIVERSAL SENSE He is
more than say Robert Plant whos fame lasted and was with his own generation but he id not span genrations like Evlis or Freddie did
Elvis was both Rock n Roll and then more country and western always on my mind is basically country and western song in style
The same goes for the beatles They were rock no roll then later they were middle of the road almost the carpenters


Michael Jackson wrote his main songs around his videos
and for them entirely , and for his dance moves.

But Queen were ROCK then a stange mix of virtually everything universal POP
Freddie Mercury is truly "THE KING OF ROCK"
There is no other.

He uses the term “angry workers” a lot, to describe the paid oppositon to the greatest rock band in history.
I think many of them still run around Queen forums such as this , and even run some of them.

The knifings at the rock gigs aren’t rare, but not on Queen’s gigs. Their fans are mannerly and intelligent people, and they don’t come to the gigs with weapons and chains. So, the man who knifed the guy wasn’t a Queen fan.

Then who was he? Guess yourselves…

SO TRUE