Queen crest Queenzone.org

Wembley VS Milton Keynes.

74 posts Page 4 of 5
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
A
MK has the superior setlist overall- eg Dragon Attack, Somebody To Love, Fat Bottomed Grls and Play The Game whereas Wembley had too many safe pop hits like I Want To break free and Friends Will Be Friends- I would have like to have seen Somebody To Love or FBG at Wembley- they would have been great.

However Wembley is better. I don't buy this idea about Fred's voice being stronger at M. It may have been rougher by Wembley but he belts out Tie Your Mother Down with a lot more strength than he did at MK. Also, the sheer scale and power is far superior at Wembley, as is the atmosphere. One senses that fred treaded on egg shelkls when talking about the Hot Space material at the Bowl.
hj
H
I don't think you can compare them, MK was filmed by channel 4 TV to be broadcast as a Tube special in 1982, whereas Wembley was alegedly filmed with a video release planned. I think this also explains why the camera angles seem better thought out.

MK spends more time playing the classics with the occasional Hot Space track thrown in (4 tracks), Wembley seems to concentrate more on The Works and A Kind of Magic (9 tracks) with the occasional classic track thrown in.

They both have their merits and their drawbacks, and both show off the talents of the band at different stages of their performing careers.
U
Setlist:
Wembley was mostly greatest hits, and Milton Keynes was more intresting.

Wembley 0 Milton Keynes 1

Performance:
Freddie's voice and Roger's drums was weak on Wembley. Milton Keynes was awesome.

Wembley 0 Milton Keynes 2

Stage:
Wembley was the biggest stage Queen ever had.

Wembley 1 Milton Keynes 2

Lights:
Wembley's lights was useless because they started in daylight. I prefer Milton Keynes also because they were closer.

Wembley 1 Milton Keynes 3

Audience:
Milton Keynes audience was louder than Wembleys, listen to Love Of My Life for example.

Wembley 1 Milton Keynes 4

Stadium:
Wembley Stadium beats Milton Keynes Bowl by far.

Wembley 2 Milton Keynes 4


Summary: Milton Keynes was better :)
J
New York '90
K
Wembley sucked. As a long time Queen fan I have to say that because it does. Freddie's voice doesn't have the "omph" in it. Even at the beginning of the show, "One Vision" sounds really dry. In contrast at MK his fresh, pliable voice almost feel wasted on the hero. I don't like the setl;ist that much at Wembley either. The old rock and roll covers they do just don't do it for me even though I think it is a throwback to their early performances. The sad part is Wembley is Queen's most famous concert to casual fans and it's still highly respected and leave them knowing that Queen is one of the best live bands ever.
F
kdj2hot wrote:
Wembley sucked. As a long time Queen fan I have to say that because it does. Freddie's voice doesn't have the "omph" in it. Even at the beginning of the show, "One Vision" sounds really dry. In contrast at MK his fresh, pliable voice almost feel wasted on the hero. I don't like the setl;ist that much at Wembley either. The old rock and roll covers they do just don't do it for me even though I think it is a throwback to their early performances. The sad part is Wembley is Queen's most famous concert to casual fans and it's still highly respected and leave them knowing that Queen is one of the best live bands ever.

+1
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=696327 Wanna trade? Here's my list...
A
I Think MK was the better gig, but if you are talking about, "value for money" of the DVD packages, It's got to be wembley, with all the multi angle shots, I love to watch it with the "Brian" Camera. plus all the other extras.

stay safe
have fun
thank god it's christmas!!!!!
Joyful the sound
M
Wembley Rocks!!!


And Milton Keynes is a good concert, but... Hot Space songs = crappy songs

Anyway, I like Budapest rather than Wembley
...End of the Beginning... My Mystical Flog ---> http://www.fotolog.com/woodywoodbecker A Clockwork World, my blog ---> http://aclockworkworld.blogspot.com
L
The band are miles better and more together at Milton Keynes - they seems like a proper hard working rock 'n' roll band, whereas at Wembley they seem more distant and more like a stadium rock band & they don't seem as rehearsed or "warmed up" at Wembley. The MK setlist is more pleasing too.
A
Man I can't choose! lol I liked the songs bettter at Milton Keyes though, but I liked the way the songs were in order better at Wembeley.
F
i prefer wembley its great.
http://blackballoon.editboard.com/index.forum http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k266/fraser24/GGO.jpg
R
Rainbow 74...

He was so damn charming then... & so enthusiastic...
Freddie Mercury *** 1946 - Forever in our hearts ***
L
Wembley!!!The reason:setlist is better!
------------------
D
This is my feeling, as well.
mike hunt wrote:
it's a hard choice for me. i think freddie's voice was at it's live peak at MK and also i like the song selection, but what i like about wembly is the crowd, i never seen such a beloved band in my life, the crowd was great. don't get me wrong, i think the performance at wembly was also great, and they were older and had more of a sense of humor. check out john deacon and roger talyor laughing at freddie during the cover tunes, when fred put on that military hat, i get a kick out of watching john laugh at his buddy. so for me it's pretty even, but performance wise i might give to milton keynes.
It is all random
S
At Wembley Freddie was a showman.

At Milton Keynes Freddie was a musician.
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.