Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

Possibility that Deacon will come ?

42 posts Page 2 of 3
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum

Sign in to watch

Watching a topic is how you opt in to reply pushes.

I think it would be wonderful if John played with them again. Heck, maybe they'd even finally do a few tracks from "TMITS" live. I think any audience would just love "Red Dirt" ...It would absolutely feel like a new Queen-song.
"I think now I can make love to your anus without making God angry" Registered: Friday, January 18, 2002
Well .. John MUST come
if it's not;
Paul = lead vocal / guitar
Brian = lead guitar / backing vocals / lead vocal
Roger = percussion / backing vocals / lead vocal
John = bass
Spike = keybord / guitar / backing vocals
and maybe Phil Collins for 'Radio Ga Ga' and 'I'm In Love ..' for the drums? hehe

then I wont go to one of the concerts :P

ow .. well .. maybe one :)
This would be an even bigger event than the Paul Rodgers announcement, at least for Queen fans. I've been frustrated over John's silence these past years. To have him come out of retirement would be MAJOR.

As far as I'm concerned, if John doesn't join, then you can't call it 'Queen'. Brian and Roger are only 50% of what Queen was, and to me, that's not enough to call it Queen, as opposed to "An evening of Queen music", with Brian May, Roger Taylor, and Paul Rogers.

The band should be a band, not a 'show'. No backup singers, or extra musicians, except for Spike to handle the keys.
blablabla... It's about the name again. Can't we finish that discussion?? Enough said about it already..
I got to try al little more, because I'm an asshole but I'm learning. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfTLkUcQ7QY
That's the thing. They will probably be backing singers and:
Jamie Moses - Playing Rythm Guitar
Maybe even another drummer?
I would prefer the only auxillary musicians to be a bass player (if john doesn't show) & Spike (Obviously)
James
believe me people,
this;
Paul = lead vocal / guitar
Brian = lead guitar / backing vocals / lead vocal
Roger = percussion / backing vocals / lead vocal
John = bass
Spike = keybord / guitar / backing vocals
would be enough .. no backing vocals, or dancers or other crap :)

Spem Bri's mail-box with this. Let's all send the man 20 e-mails with this line-up. hehe
Why "should" they bother with Spike? he's a pain in the ass sound-wise because the keys tend to be mixed far too high. Listen to anything post '81 and the keys are almost as prominent as Fred's voice - certainly mixed above Brian.

Ideally, it'd just be a 4-piece, but the band will do what they are told by the promoter and record company.
Benn
Benn wrote:
Why "should" they bother with Spike? he's a pain in the ass sound-wise because the keys tend to be mixed far too high.

I think it's not, and why should that be Spike's fould? :S
Benn said ;- "Still, she gets her free weekend at Butlins every year for running a t-shirt selling servise....

The free weekend at Butlins you mention is actually @ Pontins and it aint as free as you think - the fan club finances it and not the band. Without the fan clu there would be no convention which means that once a year 2000 people would not have the best weekend you could imagine - Then again you have probably never been so it is easy for you to sit in your ivory tower and be a critic.

Dont knock Jacky and the fan club - she does a sterling job with little cash.
Gezelle wrote:
Do you mean Steve Barnacle, the one that plays on Roger's Electric Fire album?
So it's a friend of Steve that told you about that meeting, did I understand that right?

Yep
It would be brilliant if John were to play with them again. I bet he won't though. In fact i sort of know it's not goint to happen. You can never believe everything you read in the papers.
Mlaimo wrote:
This would be an even bigger event than the Paul Rodgers announcement, at least for Queen fans. I've been frustrated over John's silence these past years. To have him come out of retirement would be MAJOR.

As far as I'm concerned, if John doesn't join, then you can't call it 'Queen'. Brian and Roger are only 50% of what Queen was, and to me, that's not enough to call it Queen, as opposed to "An evening of Queen music", with Brian May, Roger Taylor, and Paul Rogers.

The band should be a band, not a 'show'. No backup singers, or extra musicians, except for Spike to handle the keys.



Well said.
Chom own mudder fukker.
please, mr John Deacon, the universe of queen fans need you presence on 2005's tour.

we really need, because no-one but you can play the REAL QUEEN BASS GROOVES!
friends will be friens on queenzone. i hope...
Well, personally I'm with Hankster on this one.
Without John, the show could not (or should not) be billed as Queen & Paul Rogers. If Brian and Roger go ahead and carry on using the queen name as a tool for their own celebrity rather than going on the road in an honest tour as 'Brian May, Roger Taylor and Paul Rogers', it will be a travesty. One of my friends has even sworn that if they do this, he will give away his whole queen collection ( a bit drastic as it's worth about £2000, but at least he's standing by his principles.)
On the subject of backing singers/session musicians, I can think of only two songs where queen ever used a second guitar live - Crazy Little Thing, and Hammer to Fall. So why the sudden need for a rhythm player (don't even get me started on the backing singers/dancers!)
Please John, we need you to bring some sanity to this farce!
"I'll probably make loads of plans, and then just sit around on my bottom all day long and do nothing." The Man In The Shadows says it like it is. http://www.myspace.com/petearnold
Well said Mr Quackman. NOBODY can replace Mr D as far as i'm concerned. Call me a grumpy old traditionalist if you like....