Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

UK EXECUTES INNOCENT BRAZILIAN FOR WEARING A COAT

95 posts Page 4 of 7
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
G
Somebody To Love Me wrote:
Guy, you certainly know your stuff.. well done :)


Thank you very much, appreciated :)

Sonia Doris wrote:
True indeed. So let's kill them all, so there wouldn't be any threat...


I don't believe it was anyone's intention to imply that. Don't put words into people's mouths.
"You'll never find rainbows if you're looking down."  -Charlie Chaplin
G
ThomasQuinn wrote:
Guy wrote:

If when you say 'them' you mean terrorists, then the answer is yes.


That's exactly the mistake Israel makes: "if they don't like us taking their land, we'll just kill them, then they won't protest against it". Well, that just doesn't work.

Our war with the Palestinians is more than a 100 years old and nothing in our relationship has changed, but our security has.


Your conflict with the Palestines dates back to the late 1940s, when Israel was established. You were given the land, but somehow it was forgotten that there was already a people living there (reminiscent of the pope dividing the New World between Spain and Portugal, disregarding the natives). Your war dates back to the '60s, when you so kindly started occupying land which according to the treaties both of you signed belonged to the Palestines.

Since the conclusion of Operation Defensive Shield, the follow-on Operation Determined Path and the continued construction of the Israeli West Bank Barrier the level of terrorism in general, and suicide bombings in particular, has, according to some sources, dropped by more than 95% to less then five suicide bombings during the period from August 2003 to July 2004.


That wouldn't by any chance have anything to do with the fact that Israel has instigated something of an apartheid against the Palestines, making sure they can hardly leave their LEGAL (as opposed to the Colonists') settlements, now would it? Moreover, your army tends to shoot terrorists dead when they are still teenagers protesting against yet another Nazi-like measure against their people...that's an effective tactic, killing them before they get a chance to maybe become terrorist. Maybe we should enforce that worldwide. That'd solve the exess population for sure, as anyone affiliated with any opposition party worldwide would surely be killed.

I'm sorry for my sarcasm, but I just can't see the Israeli military itself as anything but a terrorist organisation.


It's quite clear what side I'm on, since I'm a Jew living in Israel (though not all Israeli Jews think the same way, mind you). That said, any "we" I use is a reference to the Jews, and any "they" I use is a reference to the Palestinians.

I'll start by saying I'm against any military action that harms innocent people in any way. However, I'm in favor of capturing terrorists and in case of immediate danger - killing them. Our way of action is simple. We surround the house of a wanted terrorist and use a loudspeaker to tell him we had surrounded the house. We then ask him to come out and surrender. Usually, the following scenario happens: he doesn't come out, we bring tractors and start demolishing the house, he comes out shooting everywhere (usually with a few terrorist friends) and we kill him (hence I said 'immediate danger').
Sometimes, when surrounding the terrorist's house is dangerous for various reasons (the area is known to "host" a lot of other armed terrorists, for example), we use helicopters which shoot missiles directly at the terrorist's car. In some cases, sadly, innocent people are hurt.

You might be sad to hear that these 2 methods DO work, at least as far as we're concerned. I know there's 1 less terrorist to get on a bus, get on a plane, enter a mall or take hostages inside a private home, and that's what matters to me. The fact his mother is at home crying, protesting, doesn't make me shed a tear, because she's the one who had given him the education that made him into what he was.

Our conflict with the Palestinians did not start back in the late 40s, when Israel was established. Maybe that's what someone made you think, but it's wrong. Read link #1 for the facts.

Our war with the Arabs does not date back to the 60s. Read link #2 for the facts. During this war, by the w
"You'll never find rainbows if you're looking down."  -Charlie Chaplin
G
What did I say about replying calmly and politely? I tolerated your horrifying comparison to the Nazis once, and replied honestly and in a mannered tone, but I will not make the same mistake again. You are the cold-hearted between the two of us, because you fail to realize that one dead terrorist means many innocent lives spared. You justify terror shamelessly, and give lame excuses to acts of terror. You twist the facts, and disregard neutral sources of information such as Wikipedia (which is edited by many people, and which gives a notice in case neutrality is disputed), explaining history teachers and books are behind you all the way. I got my facts from history teachers and books as well, only I seem to be supported in most history sources.

Maybe you think comparing someone to a Nazi is a joke, but I don't. To me, it's perhaps the worst insult one can receive, and therefore I will not continue this debate.
"You'll never find rainbows if you're looking down."  -Charlie Chaplin
G
you know, i think the terrorist couldnt beet the tri lamdas...they won the olympics, won the talent show and one of them even got a pie.
than they all sang "we are the champions" and waited for the sequel
i am the topic stopper
S
Great posts, Guy
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
B
Can anyone here put their hand on heart and swear blind that their police force has not fucked up on an operation that resulted in an innocent person being killed? I doubt it. It happens, deal with it and move on.
Cleveland May 24 to June 4th 2007 - I came, I saw, I fucked off home again.
G
Rip Van Winkle wrote:
Great posts, Guy


Thanks!
"You'll never find rainbows if you're looking down."  -Charlie Chaplin
Y
"Can anyone here put their hand on heart and swear blind that their police force has not fucked up on an operation that resulted in an innocent person being killed? I doubt it. It happens, deal with it and move on."

Yes, it happens, unfortunately. A couple of years ago a suspected terrorist (RAF) was literally executed by German police. The Minister of the Interior resigned after the shooting.

The problem is that the London police says they will do it again. They officially announced they will go on shooting people in the head when they are convinced that the suspect could be a suicide bomber. This is the end of a free society, it's Police State. The police accusing and executing in one peocedure. No need to prove anything.

Blair said he was willing to defend British life style against the terrorists but in fact he already surrendered. If it's okay for the British society that their police shoot people just because they look suspicious, they are no better than the Saddam Hussein Regime. Al Quaeda has done a good job in undermining the most basic values of a Democratic society.
I do not want any google ads here.
B
Will you people please get it into your heads that the police did not shoot him because he looked suspicious - they shot him because he refused to stop when challenged.

The guy lived and worked here for 3 years - you tell me which part of 'Armed Police, stop' he wouldn't understand.

74% of Londoners want the police to carry on with the shoot to kill policy - that's pretty democratic to me.
Cleveland May 24 to June 4th 2007 - I came, I saw, I fucked off home again.
S
I don't know about UK police, but in Russia in such cases policemen shoots up in the air firstly and then in the legs, but not 5 times in the head...

And if a guy is gonna explode himself, he wouldn't be afraid of police and wouldn't run, you know...
T
Bob The Shrek wrote:
Will you people please get it into your heads that the police did not shoot him because he looked suspicious - they shot him because he refused to stop when challenged.

The guy lived and worked here for 3 years - you tell me which part of 'Armed Police, stop' he wouldn't understand.


Maybe he was just stupid enough to think that the police wouldn't shoot him for being in the country illegally? The man had no reason to believe he was supposedly a terrorist.
Aren't all terrorists arabs? :P

I'm sure Dudley Fufkin will be thrilled with the idea of shooting anybody running away from the police (especially the foreigners), but that just isn't the way a civilised society works.
F
How about- the guy panicked?
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=696327 Wanna trade? Here's my list...
Y
"Will you people please get it into your heads that the police did not shoot him because he looked suspicious - they shot him because he refused to stop when challenged."

Sorry but this is NOT what the BBC reported and what was never denied.

They wrestled him down to the ground
he could not move
they fired 5 bullets into his head just in case

"74% of Londoners want the police to carry on with the shoot to kill policy - that's pretty democratic to me."

According to that logic the Nazi Regime was democratic because the overwhelming majority was in favour of it. Human Rights cannot be voted away by an emotionalised public. It's the strength of a free, liberal and democratic society that Human Rights are ALWAYS observed. If you think it's okay that policemen kill unarmed and innocent suspects you give up your own right to be protected against assaults by the state.
I do not want any google ads here.
B
Fair enough Fenderek, he may have done, but why?

If an armed police officer stopped you in the street, would you run? I know I wouldn't.
Cleveland May 24 to June 4th 2007 - I came, I saw, I fucked off home again.
Y
Bob - if four guys with fire arms were running at you, isn't it possible you would run - just very spontaneously? They were "under cover", the guy could not see they are police. The problem is that the terrorists already succeeded in increasing the tolerance and acceptance for such outrageous police actions to an incredible extent. It's obvious that mistakes happen but the police does not even admit it was a mistake, they claim it's lawful procedure.

A frightened public readily giving up the most basic values of a country ruled by law: that is a success the terrorists sure did not expect so quickly.
I do not want any google ads here.