...it's always nice to know that where there's a disgusting villian, there will be a profitable book deal. GAG.
At least Fuhrman's book came out first.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I would imagine there are several websites that are more open to your specific political thoughts. Surely, the discussions on those sites are more useful to you.
That's my kind way of saying how dreadful and cliched you have become. You are jumping on political and cultural bandwagons that most of us don't care about. Fuhrman, for instance, has no influence on my life whatsoever and is nothing more than a pop culture figure associated with a piss poor celebrity court case.
Whenever you do post something on these subjects of yours, most users ignore it while a few verhemently argue with you. Do you really crave attention on QZ that much that you keep posting these topics? If you truly want to discuss these issues, then find someplace else more open to you.
That's my kind way of saying how dreadful and cliched you have become. You are jumping on political and cultural bandwagons that most of us don't care about. Fuhrman, for instance, has no influence on my life whatsoever and is nothing more than a pop culture figure associated with a piss poor celebrity court case.
Whenever you do post something on these subjects of yours, most users ignore it while a few verhemently argue with you. Do you really crave attention on QZ that much that you keep posting these topics? If you truly want to discuss these issues, then find someplace else more open to you.
[QUOTE]
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
How about slow starvation? Since that seems to be what YOU'RE into.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
How about slow starvation? Since that seems to be what YOU'RE into.
Fuck sake, some people have their opinions, you have yours, whooptie doo you don't share them.
Deal with it people.
Deal with it people.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE]
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
How about slow starvation? Since that seems to be what YOU'RE into. [/QUOTE]
Slow starvation on someone who is braindead doesn't have any effect. And now I'm talking about someone who is LITERALLY braindead, so not you and your soulmates. Her body was not able to take up any usefull nourishment anyway.
If you were to know ANYTHING at all about the human body, you would've known that.
But I prefer the idea of lobotomizing you over starvation.[/QUOTE]
How do you know? How do you know she didn't feel anything? Are you her? No, you're not.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
How about slow starvation? Since that seems to be what YOU'RE into. [/QUOTE]
Slow starvation on someone who is braindead doesn't have any effect. And now I'm talking about someone who is LITERALLY braindead, so not you and your soulmates. Her body was not able to take up any usefull nourishment anyway.
If you were to know ANYTHING at all about the human body, you would've known that.
But I prefer the idea of lobotomizing you over starvation.[/QUOTE]
How do you know? How do you know she didn't feel anything? Are you her? No, you're not.
who?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zeni wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I would imagine there are several websites that are more open to your specific political thoughts.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but she was banned from the forum of the American Nazi Party because they thought she was too conservative.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
This is called "liberal tolerance".....
Yeah, but she was banned from the forum of the American Nazi Party because they thought she was too conservative.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
This is called "liberal tolerance".....
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zeni wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I would imagine there are several websites that are more open to your specific political thoughts.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but she was banned from the forum of the American Nazi Party because they thought she was too conservative.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
This is called "liberal tolerance".....[/QUOTE]
Same as conservative tolerance, which reminds me of:
- Ann Coulter claiming that the U.S. should invade the entire middle east, kill all their leaders and convert them to christianity.
- Rev. Pat Robertson calling out for the assasination of the president of Venezuela.
- Bill O'Reilly claiming that sadly the UN building wasn't hit by Katrina.
Yeah, but she was banned from the forum of the American Nazi Party because they thought she was too conservative.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
This is called "liberal tolerance".....[/QUOTE]
Same as conservative tolerance, which reminds me of:
- Ann Coulter claiming that the U.S. should invade the entire middle east, kill all their leaders and convert them to christianity.
- Rev. Pat Robertson calling out for the assasination of the president of Venezuela.
- Bill O'Reilly claiming that sadly the UN building wasn't hit by Katrina.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zeni wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I would imagine there are several websites that are more open to your specific political thoughts.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but she was banned from the forum of the American Nazi Party because they thought she was too conservative.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
This is called "liberal tolerance".....[/QUOTE]
Same as conservative tolerance, which reminds me of:
- Ann Coulter claiming that the U.S. should invade the entire middle east, kill all their leaders and convert them to christianity.
- Rev. Pat Robertson calling out for the assasination of the president of Venezuela.
- Bill O'Reilly claiming that sadly the UN building wasn't hit by Katrina.[/QUOTE]
Hmm, and /I/ said which of these statements? None of them. Coulter, O'Reilly, and Robertson are simply talking heads. No one does or should take them seriously.
Yeah, but she was banned from the forum of the American Nazi Party because they thought she was too conservative.
This 'lady' here needs a lobotomy. I mean, it can't make it any worse.[/QUOTE]
This is called "liberal tolerance".....[/QUOTE]
Same as conservative tolerance, which reminds me of:
- Ann Coulter claiming that the U.S. should invade the entire middle east, kill all their leaders and convert them to christianity.
- Rev. Pat Robertson calling out for the assasination of the president of Venezuela.
- Bill O'Reilly claiming that sadly the UN building wasn't hit by Katrina.[/QUOTE]
Hmm, and /I/ said which of these statements? None of them. Coulter, O'Reilly, and Robertson are simply talking heads. No one does or should take them seriously.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How do you know? How do you know she didn't feel anything? Are you her? No, you're not. [/QUOTE]
As has been said here several times before:
If the cerebral cortex is dead, then the person is dead. End of debate. Anyone who disagrees is either scientifically misinformed or too religious (or both).
As has been said here several times before:
If the cerebral cortex is dead, then the person is dead. End of debate. Anyone who disagrees is either scientifically misinformed or too religious (or both).
If I ever end up a vegetable...please, please switch me off right away!
More power to Michael Schiavo...as howard stern said...when blinking becomes the highlight of your day...it's time to go.
More power to Michael Schiavo...as howard stern said...when blinking becomes the highlight of your day...it's time to go.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Coulter, O'Reilly, and Robertson are simply talking heads. No one does or should take them seriously. [/QUOTE]
That reminds me...
Why is every similar comment by muslims taken as the official opinion of the entire community, and used as an excuse to villify millions of people?
And this is coming from the same people (mainly Americans and British) spend an awful lot of time emphasising how their views should not be deduced from those of their leaders.
That reminds me...
Why is every similar comment by muslims taken as the official opinion of the entire community, and used as an excuse to villify millions of people?
And this is coming from the same people (mainly Americans and British) spend an awful lot of time emphasising how their views should not be deduced from those of their leaders.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How do you know? How do you know she didn't feel anything? Are you her? No, you're not. [/QUOTE]
As has been said here several times before:
If the cerebral cortex is dead, then the person is dead. End of debate. Anyone who disagrees is either scientifically misinformed or too religious (or both).
[/QUOTE]
FYI, it's never been scientifically determined what part of the body, if any, holds the "soul". So you don't know if she was still in there. And if she was already dead, then what's the big deal? The parents wanted to pay for her, let them pay for her and keep her alive as long as they want. Why take their child out from underneath them and murder her? Ask Fred Goldman, having your child die before you is one of the most horrid things that can happen. Also, I had a friend of mine whose mother was in somewhat of a Terri-situation except she didn't really go into a coma, but there WAS brain damage. The hospital took her off life support and my friend's families are suing. The biggest thing is when you look at my friend, she's NEVER gonna get over that. I mean the hospital pulled the plug right in front of this woman's family.
As has been said here several times before:
If the cerebral cortex is dead, then the person is dead. End of debate. Anyone who disagrees is either scientifically misinformed or too religious (or both).
[/QUOTE]
FYI, it's never been scientifically determined what part of the body, if any, holds the "soul". So you don't know if she was still in there. And if she was already dead, then what's the big deal? The parents wanted to pay for her, let them pay for her and keep her alive as long as they want. Why take their child out from underneath them and murder her? Ask Fred Goldman, having your child die before you is one of the most horrid things that can happen. Also, I had a friend of mine whose mother was in somewhat of a Terri-situation except she didn't really go into a coma, but there WAS brain damage. The hospital took her off life support and my friend's families are suing. The biggest thing is when you look at my friend, she's NEVER gonna get over that. I mean the hospital pulled the plug right in front of this woman's family.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jasen101 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]If I ever end up a vegetable...please, please switch me off right away!
More power to Michael Schiavo...as howard stern said...when blinking becomes the highlight of your day...it's time to go.[/QUOTE]
Yes, more power to Michael Schiavo! More power to men who knock off the inconvient wife to marry the new bitch! More power to Scott Peterson, too!
More power to Michael Schiavo...as howard stern said...when blinking becomes the highlight of your day...it's time to go.[/QUOTE]
Yes, more power to Michael Schiavo! More power to men who knock off the inconvient wife to marry the new bitch! More power to Scott Peterson, too!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Coulter, O'Reilly, and Robertson are simply talking heads. No one does or should take them seriously. [/QUOTE]
That reminds me...
Why is every similar comment by muslims taken as the official opinion of the entire community, and used as an excuse to villify millions of people?
And this is coming from the same people (mainly Americans and British) spend an awful lot of time emphasising how their views should not be deduced from those of their leaders.[/QUOTE]
/I/ don't judge all Muslims. Many Muslims are fine people.
That reminds me...
Why is every similar comment by muslims taken as the official opinion of the entire community, and used as an excuse to villify millions of people?
And this is coming from the same people (mainly Americans and British) spend an awful lot of time emphasising how their views should not be deduced from those of their leaders.[/QUOTE]
/I/ don't judge all Muslims. Many Muslims are fine people.