Can a QUEEN ARCHIVIST Ask A Serious Question And Expect Respectful Replies?

and i'll add my twopenneth worth... (if in fact you really are Greg Brooks)

how pretentious and "up your own rectum" can you get? - first of all your choice of "nick" - "Queen Archivist" - just give yourself a real nick, not something that supposed to make everyone go "oooh fucking hell, we have royalty on board, everyone bow and scrape and mind you ghet your courtesy, and doffing the cap/touching the forelocks right"

then (having called yourself "Queen Archivist" - you then feel the "self important need" to sign as "GB"....get real, like we don't know who you are..?

there's only been ONE Archivist on here...and we know who he is...the self same someone who is responsible for "that book" - yes that one! - the abortion of an account of Queen on the road....

ffs, after that pile of literal excrement, many round here would've thought the last thing YOU would do is bring further attention to yourself...

why didn't you pick a less conspicuous "nick" - like, say - Osama Bin Laden?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: [/QUOTENAME]and i'll add my twopenneth worth... (if in fact you really are Greg Brooks)

how pretentious and "up your own rectum" can you get? - first of all your choice of "nick" - "Queen Archivist" - just give yourself a real nick, not soemthign that supposed to make everyone go "oooh fucking hell, we have royalty on board, everyone bow and scrape and mind you ghet your courtesy, and doffing the cap/touching the forelocks right"

then (havinf called yourself "Queen Archivist" - you then feel the "self important need" to sign as "GB"....get real, like we don't know who you are..?

there's only been ONE Archivist on here...and we know who he is...the slef same someone who is responsible for "that book" - yes that one! - the abortion of an account of Queen on the road....

ffs, after that pile of literal excrement, many round here would've thought the last thing YOU would do is bring further attention to yourself...

why didn't you pick a less conspicuous "nick" - like, say - Osama Bin Laden?

[/QUOTE]

AUCH! xD

Guys, theres no way this is Greg Brooks, the real one, come on.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]

Please respond with something considered and intelligent and contructive.



[/QUOTE]

And hopefully in proper English...GB added...To be honest mate, i'd have thought you were taking a risk coming here...half the people here are better than you and know it...John S Stuart (studio), Tatterdemalion (live), Mr Scully (live)...to name but a few of the people who contribute some interesting topics and information that we all get into, be it rare live songs or demos, we have great people who put ideas/facts/rumours forward to be discussed. Also, if you ask your serious question, and if you are respectful to us all, we shall be respectful and as helpful as possible in answering.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Michael Allred wrote: [/QUOTENAME]This person can't possibly be the real Greg Brooks. If it is, he should be terminated from his work for Queen immediately. It's some of the worst fan interaction I have ever seen.[/QUOTE]

Agreed, and i have never heard of GB interacting with fans, not yet anyway. And if he does, its obvious the man doesn't listen!

Here are a few threads from when GB first came to QZ back in the Fall of 2004. Compare what GB posted then to what he has posted now if you doubt whether this is actually him and come to your own conclusions.

http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=404899&TOPIC_SUBJECT=MY+POINT+OF+VIEW%2C+ON+VARIOUS+THINGS
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=406665&TOPIC_SUBJECT=YourValentine
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407208&TOPIC_SUBJECT=GREG+BROOKS+IS+DISLIKED+%2D+reply+to+Luca+%28Hangman%29+email
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407209&TOPIC_SUBJECT=GREG+BROOKS+IS+DSLIKED+%2D+Reply+to+Luca+%28Hangman%29
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407257&TOPIC_SUBJECT=Someone+pass+me+a+bucket+please+%2D+JOHN+STUART+IS+GROVELLING
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=408508&TOPIC_SUBJECT=YOU+ALL+LOVE+ME+REALLY+%2D+I+KNOW+YOU%27RE+JUST+PLAYING+WITH+ME%21

There are more; just search for his old username of GB.


Otherwise, I think Guru pretty much summed things up. If GB really wants better communication with fans, then he has to participate on a mature level and I'm sure there are many QZers willing to help. But the onus is on him at this point.

I hope that everyone in here notices that I have remained silent.

For far too long - I blamed myself for all bad feeling.

Now I see that I can sleep with easy conscience.

Hah, maybe it is him :P Somebody e-mail that address on Brian's site to see...

Sometimes i wonder how my life had been without Queen comunity. BM has his soapbox cant QZ change forums to A Night at the SoapOpera or something !
Friends will be friends ?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I hope that everyone in here notices that I have remained silent.

For far too long - I blamed myself for all bad feeling.

Now I see that I can sleep with easy conscience.[/QUOTE]

I most certainly noticed your absence, and you did the right thing. Sleep well, my friend. :)

I don't even care anymore, the guy is a troll. Archivist or none, it's most irregular behaviour!

Greg you are misquoting me! You said :

"TRS, Stephan,.......... You might know a ton of stuff that few people are aware of, for all I know. I'd rather hear you talking about that, than my wife or kids please."

Have I said anything about your family, kids? Nope! Please correct this, because you are putting words in my mouth which I didnt say!

Freddie is sleeply peacefully in Heaven and all you do is argue huh ? lol

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]radio_what's_new wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dear QZ-ers,


We, I, won't ask HERE again. We will go instead to a place where people talk to other people with respect. Where they don't say "I DETEST YOU" for no reason, and where, when asked, theydo actually want to help out for the betterment of the product.

Please respond with something considered and intelligent and contructive.

Thank you

GB

[/QUOTE]

I said I detested you, because: ( I detest people who call other people):

-Plonkers
-pleb
-dick-heads
-Simple people
-shit head
-weirdos
-morons

So don't tell me that I said this with no reason...You are complaining that I said I detest because you were throwing mud and calling people awfull names, and thats the exact reason why I said I detested you.
I detested your behaviour...and that
seems fair enough to me...

I agree that it's about time to stop this childish way of communicating...from both ways....And I even understand your dissapointment at some of the reactions on here...but the best thing you can do is ignore the nasty words...be above it...If you will do that, and I think you can, and don't call people names etc.. than I am pretty sure that I can respect you...




[/QUOTE]