Is paul the best thing that ever happened to Queen?

I love hamburgers.

In MY opinion... He isn't the BEST thing that's happened to Queen recently... BUT! He's helped alot in getting them to collaberate with him and sale out loads of gigs. If you think about it, theres alot more youth liking Queen, ever since they opened the WWRY Musical and did the tours. I'm sure of it.

honestly i dont think that paul's voice fit in queen's songs...nobody is going to sing better than freddie of course but for ex. george michel would be much better than paul. george singing somebody to love sounds pretty similar to the orginal!

ohh and i hate hamburgers XD LOL

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]½Microwave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I love hamburgers.[/QUOTE]

Chocolate milkshakes!

i dont personally think that Paul can sing Queen songs very well...i guess its cos i just dont really like Paul Rogers...he can do his own thing very well...but...i dont think he's the 'best thing' to happen...

[edit]

i dont hate paul. he's a good singer. really. but i dont hate him. i just dont prefer him. sure i'd go to see a Q+PR concert, but naw...i dont prefer him.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Donna13 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]½Microwave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I love hamburgers.[/QUOTE]

Chocolate milkshakes![/QUOTE]

I HAVE A RED PENCIL

From one of my rants months ago:

Paul Rodgers rocks. If you didn't get goosebumps hearing "Reaching Out" blend into a crashing version of "Tie Your Mother", there's something terribly wrong with you (as a fucking Queen fan). I absolutely can not wait to see Paul and the boys live in Georgia. I completely agree with the first post of this thread.

That having been said, let me just say that I am more than sick of hearing the ranting and raving of anti-Paul Queen "fans". If you don't care for Paul and are under the impression that Queen died in 1991, keep it under your hat. Don't rain on everyone else's parade. We're all well aware that Freddie Mercury died, that Paul is not really the lead singer for Queen and that Queen was and always will be Freddie Mercury, John Deacon, Roger Taylor and Brian May. However, what we are left with is Queen as they are now. No Freddie. No John. Paul Rodgers, along with other musicians, is merely filling the shoes of those no longer present. Paul has given Brian and Roger whatever motivation neccessary to continue the Queen legacy. I am very thankful for him, simply because I seriously doubt Brian and Roger would have toured without fusing Paul into the mix.

I saw Brian and Roger perform as Queen (pre-Paul) in September of 2004 at the premiere of WWRY in Las Vegas. Previously, I'd never seen the boys live. Certainly there was no Freddie, but the spirit and the rocking sound of Queen came through loud and clear. The performance was astounding. Loud. Brilliant. Paul merely adds to their brilliance, if you ask me, and perfectly compliments the Queen sound.

i dont think paul has been the best thing thats happen to Queen. i mean i have nothing against him but Queen without Freddie is like cheese burgers without cheese.

*awaits the Gary Cherone would be a better choice than Paul post and the why isn't John Deacon playing with them post*

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]queen+paul fan wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I know queens history, but I personally never liked them until I heard paul on vocals along with brian and roger. ROTC is simply some of rocks best live performances, and paul is simply unmatched. Don't get me wrong freddie Mercury and rober plant are good, but paul is amazing![/QUOTE]

You know nothing about music and life also!idiot

I THINK QUEEN IS THE BEST THING TO HAPPEN TO PAUL!!!

Got ya!....man I put on a good joke. Imagine paul rodgers being the best thing to happen to queen!...you kids actually thought I was serious.

Huh? Did I read this question correctly?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]mircal wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I THINK QUEEN IS THE BEST THING TO HAPPEN TO PAUL!!![/QUOTE]

'Nuff Said.