[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Hank H. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]It won't work, you have to write the numbers in capitals as well.[/QUOTE]
I guess I've lost my chance, then. In the style of the Seinfeld soup nazi:
NO INFO FOR YOU!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Can't anybody ban this tart?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Cwazy little thing wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I wish people wouldnt come bursting into Greg Brooks threads trying to get him to tell us whether Freddie recorded this song, or whether theres a 900 minute version of BO Rap out there- its such a waste of time.
He clearly isnt going to reveal anything, because firstly he never has before, and secondly I suspect in order to maintain excitement about potential future products, and a sense of mystery, which no doubt does wonders for sales, he's probably not allowed to tell us what does and doesnt exist on here...[/QUOTE]
Cwazy little thing: With respect, what a load of nonsense.
When the first box-set is planned for release, the track-listing will leak onto the internet within 15 minutes, and when the first test pressing is cut, that too will leak within 15 minutes of publication.
Am I really that dumb, that I am expected to believe that sales of the box-set will be irreparably damaged, because I have been previously informed that a version of ‘Modern Times Rock And Roll’ resides in the vaults with Freddie on vocals?
So why all the cloak and dagger?
There is no difference between rude and ignorance, and to ignore politely requested information – or indeed to answer with an arrogant aside – is, (IMHO) patronising arrogance in the extreme.
[/QUOTE]
John - I dont disagree with most of that - the fact is there are people - yourself included who have some good idea about what may or may not exist already, and youre right about internet leaks and suchlike.
What I was really getting at was people trying to prise info from GB left right and centre, in completely unrelated threads.
Out of sheer curiosity I scan these types of threads, and theres always some random Joe who takes it as an oppurtunity to ask some irrelevant question - it just seems silly.
That said, I think GB was making a point, and probably taking the mickey a bit above when he decided to actually answer someones' question - probably based on what you said in reply to me.
I just reckon there should be a separate thread for genuine questions to Greg. I wouldnt think he'd be in the mood to answer them mid-retort to someone in one of these, lol.
And absolutely - you deserve an answer to a legitimate question - either in the form of an explanation for the "cloak and dagger", or with the information you actually desire.
Maybe its all gone a bit far for that with Greg though - theres been so many slanging wars on here, I doubt he'd bother to get involved with sensible questions; he clearly doesnt like most of the people on here- which again leads me back to thinking its pointless asking in the first place - particularly in the middle of a thread such as this.
He clearly isnt going to reveal anything, because firstly he never has before, and secondly I suspect in order to maintain excitement about potential future products, and a sense of mystery, which no doubt does wonders for sales, he's probably not allowed to tell us what does and doesnt exist on here...[/QUOTE]
Cwazy little thing: With respect, what a load of nonsense.
When the first box-set is planned for release, the track-listing will leak onto the internet within 15 minutes, and when the first test pressing is cut, that too will leak within 15 minutes of publication.
Am I really that dumb, that I am expected to believe that sales of the box-set will be irreparably damaged, because I have been previously informed that a version of ‘Modern Times Rock And Roll’ resides in the vaults with Freddie on vocals?
So why all the cloak and dagger?
There is no difference between rude and ignorance, and to ignore politely requested information – or indeed to answer with an arrogant aside – is, (IMHO) patronising arrogance in the extreme.
[/QUOTE]
John - I dont disagree with most of that - the fact is there are people - yourself included who have some good idea about what may or may not exist already, and youre right about internet leaks and suchlike.
What I was really getting at was people trying to prise info from GB left right and centre, in completely unrelated threads.
Out of sheer curiosity I scan these types of threads, and theres always some random Joe who takes it as an oppurtunity to ask some irrelevant question - it just seems silly.
That said, I think GB was making a point, and probably taking the mickey a bit above when he decided to actually answer someones' question - probably based on what you said in reply to me.
I just reckon there should be a separate thread for genuine questions to Greg. I wouldnt think he'd be in the mood to answer them mid-retort to someone in one of these, lol.
And absolutely - you deserve an answer to a legitimate question - either in the form of an explanation for the "cloak and dagger", or with the information you actually desire.
Maybe its all gone a bit far for that with Greg though - theres been so many slanging wars on here, I doubt he'd bother to get involved with sensible questions; he clearly doesnt like most of the people on here- which again leads me back to thinking its pointless asking in the first place - particularly in the middle of a thread such as this.