[QUOTENAME]<font color=gold>§|\/|1<font color=1>++ÿ wrote: If they really really wanted to cash in even more, they'd release...I dunno,
"The best of Freddie Mercury Part 45 (P.S. he wrote the Bohemian Rhapsody that was on Wayne's World)"
or something like that.[/QUOTE]
What do you mean, like releasing another Greatest Hits album after an appearance on American Idol perhaps? Or how about letting the Crazy Frog record Mercury's "WATC"??
There's no level to which they won't stoop anymore if there's a buck in it. They'll even now record new music as Queen. Grief is officially over, replaced by greed[/QUOTE]
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]kenny8 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
What do you mean, like releasing another Greatest Hits album after an appearance on American Idol perhaps? Or how about letting the Crazy Frog record Mercury's "WATC"??
There's no level to which they won't stoop anymore if there's a buck in it. They'll even now record new music as Queen. Grief is officially over, replaced by greed[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
I'm not saying I support any of the numerous re-hashes over the years. It's disgusting actually. I feel that they'd pay the most respect to the Queen name by releasing new material rather than letting Crazy Frog re-record WATC. That's just weird.
What do you mean, like releasing another Greatest Hits album after an appearance on American Idol perhaps? Or how about letting the Crazy Frog record Mercury's "WATC"??
There's no level to which they won't stoop anymore if there's a buck in it. They'll even now record new music as Queen. Grief is officially over, replaced by greed[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
I'm not saying I support any of the numerous re-hashes over the years. It's disgusting actually. I feel that they'd pay the most respect to the Queen name by releasing new material rather than letting Crazy Frog re-record WATC. That's just weird.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]s.m. wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=blue>Rick wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
And besides, Roger and Brian have all the right to use the name 'Queen'. There were the true founders of this band. Freddie joined them later on.
[/QUOTE]
you should learn the facts first
brian may and roger taylor only formed the smile
along with tim staffel
freedie insigated the making of the group, and gave it it´s name
nice to see that queen fans dont know the band´s history
[/QUOTE]I agree, it drives me crazy when people make up their own history.
And besides, Roger and Brian have all the right to use the name 'Queen'. There were the true founders of this band. Freddie joined them later on.
[/QUOTE]
you should learn the facts first
brian may and roger taylor only formed the smile
along with tim staffel
freedie insigated the making of the group, and gave it it´s name
nice to see that queen fans dont know the band´s history
[/QUOTE]I agree, it drives me crazy when people make up their own history.
I don't have a problem with brian and roger working with paul. I have a lot of respect for him as a singer/musician, just don't call it queen, how can you name a band queen without freddie mercury?....who say's people who don't like queen + paul are living in the past?....I can easily turn that around and say it's brian and roger and their stefords who are living in the past. How can brian and roger sink so low!
This is rediculous, and it is splitting QZ in two!
It's fair that they tour again, and if they just call themselfs Queen + PR, then it's a compromise.. But can we please stop this discussion? we should'nt argue about wich kind of Queenfan is the right to be, as long as we all like the band in one way or another!
I will always perfer the original Queen, and I always will, but everybody has made their bloddy statement now! Lets move on please???
It's fair that they tour again, and if they just call themselfs Queen + PR, then it's a compromise.. But can we please stop this discussion? we should'nt argue about wich kind of Queenfan is the right to be, as long as we all like the band in one way or another!
I will always perfer the original Queen, and I always will, but everybody has made their bloddy statement now! Lets move on please???
This is rediculous, and it is splitting QZ in two!
It's fair that they tour again, and if they just call themselfs Queen + PR, then it's a compromise.. But can we please stop this discussion? we should'nt argue about wich kind of Queenfan is the right to be, as long as we all like the band in one way or another!
I will always perfer the original Queen, and I always will, but everybody has made their bloddy statement now! Lets move on please???
It's fair that they tour again, and if they just call themselfs Queen + PR, then it's a compromise.. But can we please stop this discussion? we should'nt argue about wich kind of Queenfan is the right to be, as long as we all like the band in one way or another!
I will always perfer the original Queen, and I always will, but everybody has made their bloddy statement now! Lets move on please???
Yes calling themselves Queen + Paul Rodgers is a compromise.
Even the music press mentioned it last year as a way of distiguishing itself from the classic Queen that everyone is familiar with.
Now if the fucking ignorant-ass music press can "get it" and make a clear distinction, why are people on this and other fan sites having such a hard fucking time with it?
Was there this much uproar over the Pepsi ad with Britney or with Queen + 5ive?
Even the music press mentioned it last year as a way of distiguishing itself from the classic Queen that everyone is familiar with.
Now if the fucking ignorant-ass music press can "get it" and make a clear distinction, why are people on this and other fan sites having such a hard fucking time with it?
Was there this much uproar over the Pepsi ad with Britney or with Queen + 5ive?
Alright. I want to apologise for my anger in the opening post. I think I had a bad day or something. But sometimes I just get so fed up hearing how horrible Brian and Roger are touring with the Queensongs. If people dont like it they can choose to not buy it. They will never ruin anything from the past, more likely they will get more people into the original Queen. Queen will always be Fredde, Brian, Roger and John. But we will also see Queen without Freddie I think, but noone will ever replace him. But this has been discussed many times.
I will buy the album anyway. Freddie havent written good songs for Queen for about 25 years. His 80s writing in Queen were a disgrace to me. Brian and Roger saved it. But thats my opinion. Freddie was always great live though
I will buy the album anyway. Freddie havent written good songs for Queen for about 25 years. His 80s writing in Queen were a disgrace to me. Brian and Roger saved it. But thats my opinion. Freddie was always great live though
Queen can't go on without Freddie. It's not the same.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=pink>Evil Twin Brother of GB wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Queen can't go on without Freddie. It's not the same.[/QUOTE]
Queen wouldn't be the same without Freddie, Brianne, Roger Taylore and Jon Dikon.
Queen wouldn't be the same without Freddie, Brianne, Roger Taylore and Jon Dikon.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=red>Flash! wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=pink>Evil Twin Brother of GB wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Queen can't go on without Freddie. It's not the same.[/QUOTE]
Queen wouldn't be the same without Freddie, Brianne, Roger Taylore and Jon Dikon.[/QUOTE]
LOL!
Queen wouldn't be the same without Freddie, Brianne, Roger Taylore and Jon Dikon.[/QUOTE]
LOL!
Yeah, let's close this thread with a laugh, huh?
As the man said..."it's only a bloody record...."
As the man said..."it's only a bloody record...."
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Another Roger (re) wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Alright. I want to apologise for my anger in the opening post. I think I had a bad day or something. But sometimes I just get so fed up hearing how horrible Brian and Roger are touring with the Queensongs. If people dont like it they can choose to not buy it. They will never ruin anything from the past, more likely they will get more people into the original Queen. Queen will always be Fredde, Brian, Roger and John. But we will also see Queen without Freddie I think, but noone will ever replace him. But this has been discussed many times.
I will buy the album anyway. Freddie havent written good songs for Queen for about 25 years. His 80s writing in Queen were a disgrace to me. Brian and Roger saved it. But thats my opinion. Freddie was always great live though
[/QUOTE]I guess your not into the innuendo album, freddie wrote most of the material on that album. The song innuendo was mostly his, slightly mad, the hitman and a winter's tale from made in heaven. Some of my all time fav tracks were in his last days. "Roger" is easily the worst songwriter in queen in my opinion.
I will buy the album anyway. Freddie havent written good songs for Queen for about 25 years. His 80s writing in Queen were a disgrace to me. Brian and Roger saved it. But thats my opinion. Freddie was always great live though
[/QUOTE]I guess your not into the innuendo album, freddie wrote most of the material on that album. The song innuendo was mostly his, slightly mad, the hitman and a winter's tale from made in heaven. Some of my all time fav tracks were in his last days. "Roger" is easily the worst songwriter in queen in my opinion.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]mike hunt wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Another Roger (re) wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Alright. I want to apologise for my anger in the opening post. I think I had a bad day or something. But sometimes I just get so fed up hearing how horrible Brian and Roger are touring with the Queensongs. If people dont like it they can choose to not buy it. They will never ruin anything from the past, more likely they will get more people into the original Queen. Queen will always be Fredde, Brian, Roger and John. But we will also see Queen without Freddie I think, but noone will ever replace him. But this has been discussed many times.
I will buy the album anyway. Freddie havent written good songs for Queen for about 25 years. His 80s writing in Queen were a disgrace to me. Brian and Roger saved it. But thats my opinion. Freddie was always great live though
[/QUOTE]I guess your not into the innuendo album, freddie wrote most of the material on that album. The song innuendo was mostly his, slightly mad, the hitman and a winter's tale from made in heaven. Some of my all time fav tracks were in his last days. "Roger" is easily the worst songwriter in queen in my opinion.[/QUOTE] I agree, actually he wrote a lot of good ones on the mircle/innuendo. Was it all worth it and the miracle was his and are solid songs. "Don't try so hard" is also all freddie. And we know about innuendo/slightly mad are brilliant.
I will buy the album anyway. Freddie havent written good songs for Queen for about 25 years. His 80s writing in Queen were a disgrace to me. Brian and Roger saved it. But thats my opinion. Freddie was always great live though
[/QUOTE]I guess your not into the innuendo album, freddie wrote most of the material on that album. The song innuendo was mostly his, slightly mad, the hitman and a winter's tale from made in heaven. Some of my all time fav tracks were in his last days. "Roger" is easily the worst songwriter in queen in my opinion.[/QUOTE] I agree, actually he wrote a lot of good ones on the mircle/innuendo. Was it all worth it and the miracle was his and are solid songs. "Don't try so hard" is also all freddie. And we know about innuendo/slightly mad are brilliant.