I dont have anything against Paul Rodgers but for me Queen isn't the same without our wonderful Freddie.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
FUCK THOSE 2 DOG SHITS.
New material from them is okay but has to be absolutely no queen NOT EVEN THE FUCKING TITLE. They are cowards in my eyes right now they are afraid to go make a new band or use a different title FUCKING COWARDLY DOG SHITS.
We dont see the fucking Beatles ...! So why the fuck is there Queen? QUEEN FUCKING ENDED LIKE THE BEATLES! WE ONLY HAVE THE RECORDINGS LEFT OF THE BANDS!! Fuck those 2 dog shits and that wild fugly monkey in place of the original frontman! THOSE SHITS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO RESPECT FOR THE FANS NOR FREDDIE
New material from them is okay but has to be absolutely no queen NOT EVEN THE FUCKING TITLE. They are cowards in my eyes right now they are afraid to go make a new band or use a different title FUCKING COWARDLY DOG SHITS.
We dont see the fucking Beatles ...! So why the fuck is there Queen? QUEEN FUCKING ENDED LIKE THE BEATLES! WE ONLY HAVE THE RECORDINGS LEFT OF THE BANDS!! Fuck those 2 dog shits and that wild fugly monkey in place of the original frontman! THOSE SHITS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO RESPECT FOR THE FANS NOR FREDDIE
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]greaserkat wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Let talk about a band that had the same thing happend to its lead singer. The Doors. Are they the same band if the had replaced Jim a decade after he passed away?? [/QUOTE]
They tried, first with that Creed singer (who?) and with Cult's Ian Astbury (might have tried others before and after these 2). And as everybody knows, they sold millions of copies and tickets (NOT!).
For the sake of comparison: Page and Plant. Are they Led Zeppelin? Well... sort of. But did they ever use the name of Zep in their P/P concerts? No. It's not "Zeppelin and Guests" or "Led and Jason Bonham". I saw them live in 96 (amazing - it was closer to a "true" Zep concert than a Queen+PR is to a "true" Queen concert) and a few minutes before the concert there was this group of fans walking around the stadium with a big banner that said "the dream isn't over, Zep is back" (or something). To them and their mushrooms, it was Zep, so what?
They are calling themselves Queen. Fine, they own the name and it's not our *ahem* business. You are a huge Queen fan, and you go to one of these hybrid concerts. And the first song that is played isn't a Queen song. I'd feel cheated.
They tried, first with that Creed singer (who?) and with Cult's Ian Astbury (might have tried others before and after these 2). And as everybody knows, they sold millions of copies and tickets (NOT!).
For the sake of comparison: Page and Plant. Are they Led Zeppelin? Well... sort of. But did they ever use the name of Zep in their P/P concerts? No. It's not "Zeppelin and Guests" or "Led and Jason Bonham". I saw them live in 96 (amazing - it was closer to a "true" Zep concert than a Queen+PR is to a "true" Queen concert) and a few minutes before the concert there was this group of fans walking around the stadium with a big banner that said "the dream isn't over, Zep is back" (or something). To them and their mushrooms, it was Zep, so what?
They are calling themselves Queen. Fine, they own the name and it's not our *ahem* business. You are a huge Queen fan, and you go to one of these hybrid concerts. And the first song that is played isn't a Queen song. I'd feel cheated.