javascript:cnnVideo('play','/video/law/2007/01/27/sanchez.sex.offender.cnn','2007/02/10');
(copy link to your navigation bar)
A sodomy law from the fucking 18th Century. And still you call yourselves a civilized country?!
Do you still burn witches too, perhaps?!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
The full first line is the link, btw. Including the semi-colon.
Country? Yes.
The county prosecutors? Shameful. Complete idiots. The idiots who changed the law in the state because of what happened in this case, but were too ignorant to make it retro-active? Complete ineptitude.
Why do you insist on painting with such a broad brush? I don't think that anyone, other than the punk prosecutors in this case, is deserving of that. They are thes one that deserve to be in prison....
The county prosecutors? Shameful. Complete idiots. The idiots who changed the law in the state because of what happened in this case, but were too ignorant to make it retro-active? Complete ineptitude.
Why do you insist on painting with such a broad brush? I don't think that anyone, other than the punk prosecutors in this case, is deserving of that. They are thes one that deserve to be in prison....
B.J. - what a great name for his attorney!
What a horrible verdict - to send a good boy to prison for nothing.
Sign the online petition and help with a small donation, they have paypal
http://www.wilsonappeal.com/index.php
Sign the online petition and help with a small donation, they have paypal
http://www.wilsonappeal.com/index.php
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]YourValentine wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What a horrible verdict - to send a good boy to prison for nothing.
Sign the online petition and help with a small donation, they have paypal
http://www.wilsonappeal.com/index.php [/QUOTE]
Thanks for this link, Barb (and TQ for calling attention to it). I hope everyone signs the petition and donates.
This situation is inexcusable. Everyone should be asking themselves what they would do if this happened to their child. If the law was overturned but specifically did not apply to your son/daughter, what would you do? Imagine the heartbreak. Convicted rapists get out in less time than this kid will. And he did nothing wrong. It's disgusting.
The 'system' will have succeeded only in turning a boy with a bright future into a justifiably angry man. Just what society needs.
Sign the online petition and help with a small donation, they have paypal
http://www.wilsonappeal.com/index.php [/QUOTE]
Thanks for this link, Barb (and TQ for calling attention to it). I hope everyone signs the petition and donates.
This situation is inexcusable. Everyone should be asking themselves what they would do if this happened to their child. If the law was overturned but specifically did not apply to your son/daughter, what would you do? Imagine the heartbreak. Convicted rapists get out in less time than this kid will. And he did nothing wrong. It's disgusting.
The 'system' will have succeeded only in turning a boy with a bright future into a justifiably angry man. Just what society needs.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhounski wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Country? Yes.
The county prosecutors? Shameful. Complete idiots. The idiots who changed the law in the state because of what happened in this case, but were too ignorant to make it retro-active? Complete ineptitude.
Why do you insist on painting with such a broad brush? I don't think that anyone, other than the punk prosecutors in this case, is deserving of that. They are thes one that deserve to be in prison....[/QUOTE]
The state that kept such a law for a century after it's overdue is retarded in my eyes.
The county prosecutors? Shameful. Complete idiots. The idiots who changed the law in the state because of what happened in this case, but were too ignorant to make it retro-active? Complete ineptitude.
Why do you insist on painting with such a broad brush? I don't think that anyone, other than the punk prosecutors in this case, is deserving of that. They are thes one that deserve to be in prison....[/QUOTE]
The state that kept such a law for a century after it's overdue is retarded in my eyes.
While I agree that the verdict is stupid you are once again painting the entire United States as an awful place. That state is not the only place in the entire world that has outdated laws.
You are using this awful verdict as another opportunity to bash the United States.
Trust me, you have NO idea what it's really like here.
You are using this awful verdict as another opportunity to bash the United States.
Trust me, you have NO idea what it's really like here.
It has happened before in Georgia. Many husbands were arrested in the past for having been caught on tape anally fucking their wives. That is called 'sodomy' and it's a crime there. Georgia is a shitty state.
Sex should be okay as long as the participants of the fuck(the fucker/fuckor/fuckist and the fuckee) are atleast or almost 13 years old and use a condom. Sex is a good thing. Not everyone has it, but everybody should. Putting a kid in jail just because of a one-year disparity between the supposed age of the "victim" and the legal age of consent is...gay. Teens have sex everywhere. They fuck in the USA, Japan, India, the UK, the street, inside sewers, underneath their parents' beds, within closets...yeah, just about everywhere. Fuck and let fuck.
Sex should be okay as long as the participants of the fuck(the fucker/fuckor/fuckist and the fuckee) are atleast or almost 13 years old and use a condom. Sex is a good thing. Not everyone has it, but everybody should. Putting a kid in jail just because of a one-year disparity between the supposed age of the "victim" and the legal age of consent is...gay. Teens have sex everywhere. They fuck in the USA, Japan, India, the UK, the street, inside sewers, underneath their parents' beds, within closets...yeah, just about everywhere. Fuck and let fuck.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Everyone should be asking themselves what they would do if this happened to their child.
.
.
.
And he did nothing wrong.
[/QUOTE]
To begin, the 10 year sentence is unfair, especially in light of what other child molesters have received (like that white schoolteacher mentioned in the article).
But let me point out one thing:
He helped plan a party that included younger teens, alcohol, marijuana, and videotaped sex. To say he "did nothing wrong" ignores those facts. If the 15 year old were my daughter, I would be justifiably angry with both her behavior and the behavior of those older boys.
EDIT - ah, Pieter beat me to it. I agree with what he said.
Everyone should be asking themselves what they would do if this happened to their child.
.
.
.
And he did nothing wrong.
[/QUOTE]
To begin, the 10 year sentence is unfair, especially in light of what other child molesters have received (like that white schoolteacher mentioned in the article).
But let me point out one thing:
He helped plan a party that included younger teens, alcohol, marijuana, and videotaped sex. To say he "did nothing wrong" ignores those facts. If the 15 year old were my daughter, I would be justifiably angry with both her behavior and the behavior of those older boys.
EDIT - ah, Pieter beat me to it. I agree with what he said.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Saif wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Sex should be okay as long as the participants of the fuck(the fucker/fuckor/fuckist and the fuckee) are atleast or almost 13 years old and use a condom.
.
.
.
Fuck and let fuck.[/QUOTE]
That is just incredibly stupid.
Sex should be okay as long as the participants of the fuck(the fucker/fuckor/fuckist and the fuckee) are atleast or almost 13 years old and use a condom.
.
.
.
Fuck and let fuck.[/QUOTE]
That is just incredibly stupid.
The young man arrested was admittedly not a saint...
That said, the punishment here does NOT fit the crime.
Should he have been in legal trouble over what happened? Absolutely. 60 days in jail perhaps? 3-5 years probation? Sure.
But, it should have had nothing to do with the sex act, and had to do with setting up the party where kids were drinking illegally, and using illegal drugs.
That said, the punishment here does NOT fit the crime.
Should he have been in legal trouble over what happened? Absolutely. 60 days in jail perhaps? 3-5 years probation? Sure.
But, it should have had nothing to do with the sex act, and had to do with setting up the party where kids were drinking illegally, and using illegal drugs.
We should ban sex from our lives and lives of our children and lives of their children. No sex - no problem. Read the books rather!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zeni wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Everyone should be asking themselves what they would do if this happened to their child.
.
.
.
And he did nothing wrong.
[/QUOTE]
But let me point out one thing:
He helped plan a party that included younger teens, alcohol, marijuana, and videotaped sex. To say he "did nothing wrong" ignores those facts. [/QUOTE]
Yes, it does ignore those facts, and so it's a mis-statement on my part. However, it was my understanding that the cause for his arrest and incarceration was the sex and nothing more, and so I agree with Haystacks...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhounski wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The young man arrested was admittedly not a saint...
That said, the punishment here does NOT fit the crime.
Should he have been in legal trouble over what happened? Absolutely. 60 days in jail perhaps? 3-5 years probation? Sure.
But, it should have had nothing to do with the sex act, and had to do with setting up the party where kids were drinking illegally, and using illegal drugs.
[/QUOTE]
Everyone should be asking themselves what they would do if this happened to their child.
.
.
.
And he did nothing wrong.
[/QUOTE]
But let me point out one thing:
He helped plan a party that included younger teens, alcohol, marijuana, and videotaped sex. To say he "did nothing wrong" ignores those facts. [/QUOTE]
Yes, it does ignore those facts, and so it's a mis-statement on my part. However, it was my understanding that the cause for his arrest and incarceration was the sex and nothing more, and so I agree with Haystacks...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhounski wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The young man arrested was admittedly not a saint...
That said, the punishment here does NOT fit the crime.
Should he have been in legal trouble over what happened? Absolutely. 60 days in jail perhaps? 3-5 years probation? Sure.
But, it should have had nothing to do with the sex act, and had to do with setting up the party where kids were drinking illegally, and using illegal drugs.
[/QUOTE]