I would like to see people's oppinions on this one
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I thought they did?
David Bowie gave him AIDs, dumped him and told him it's fair. That's why.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I thought they did? [/QUOTE]
I've heard they only got along for recording reasons..they never preformed Under Pressure live..
I've heard they only got along for recording reasons..they never preformed Under Pressure live..
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Saif wrote: [/QUOTENAME]David Bowie gave him AIDs, dumped him and told him it's fair. That's why.[/QUOTE]
lmao..very funny dear..if anyone want's to email me..plz do @ colfarrell1@aol.com
lmao..very funny dear..if anyone want's to email me..plz do @ colfarrell1@aol.com
Because Bowie's better looking but Freddie's a better singer.
Because Freddie wouldn't put out on the first date on the grounds that he wasn't yet sure if Mr. Bowie was REALLY a man.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Because Freddie wouldn't put out on the first date on the grounds that he wasn't yet sure if Mr. Bowie was REALLY a man.[/QUOTE]
Lmao!
Its because they were both too busy to meet up
Lmao!
Its because they were both too busy to meet up
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]colfarrell1 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I thought they did? [/QUOTE]
I've heard they only got along for recording reasons..they never preformed Under Pressure live..[/QUOTE]
Is that it? Because they got on with their own careers and never sang together live, you conclude they didn't get on?
Why did Bowie do so much at the Tribute show then? Why has UP been in his set pretty much ever since?
I've heard they only got along for recording reasons..they never preformed Under Pressure live..[/QUOTE]
Is that it? Because they got on with their own careers and never sang together live, you conclude they didn't get on?
Why did Bowie do so much at the Tribute show then? Why has UP been in his set pretty much ever since?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Penetration_Guru wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]colfarrell1 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I thought they did? [/QUOTE]
I've heard they only got along for recording reasons..they never preformed Under Pressure live..[/QUOTE]
Is that it? Because they got on with their own careers and never sang together live, you conclude they didn't get on?
Why did Bowie do so much at the Tribute show then? Why has UP been in his set pretty much ever since?[/QUOTE]
Because it was good for his career.
I've heard they only got along for recording reasons..they never preformed Under Pressure live..[/QUOTE]
Is that it? Because they got on with their own careers and never sang together live, you conclude they didn't get on?
Why did Bowie do so much at the Tribute show then? Why has UP been in his set pretty much ever since?[/QUOTE]
Because it was good for his career.
Good point PG!
Bowie did not need UP for his career.
Bowie did not need UP for his career.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ducksoup wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Good point PG!
Bowie did not need UP for his career. [/QUOTE]
I didn't say he needed it. But it was good for him.
Bowie did not need UP for his career. [/QUOTE]
I didn't say he needed it. But it was good for him.
please shut up.
why do people on queenzone try to reinvent history?...since when didn't freddie and bowie not get along?...this is news to me.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]mike hunt wrote: [/QUOTENAME]why do people on queenzone try to reinvent history?...since when didn't freddie and bowie not get along?...this is news to me.[/QUOTE]
And me i thought they were the best of pals.
And me i thought they were the best of pals.