Thank's but I can decode flac to wav..I've got easy audio converter pro..after this..nero doesn't accept those files..
Anyway thank you very much for help! :-)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Any idea about second gig in Sao Paulo - did radio broadcasted full gig or only some very short part what we have ? Audience recording is so poor :(
Antonio do You know somethinks more about that ?
Antonio do You know somethinks more about that ?
How can I convert these flac onto mp3?
.......hey, just kidding, ok?
Seriously, I just can´t burn. Nero says "these WAV files are protected...". What I have to do?
Any idea? Thanks!
.......hey, just kidding, ok?
Seriously, I just can´t burn. Nero says "these WAV files are protected...". What I have to do?
Any idea? Thanks!
Me too Fernando..It's all day that I'm trying..but nothing..
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]YourValentine wrote: [/QUOTENAME]For some reason I am now able to convert the flacs to wav with FlacFrontend. The files don't fit on 2 CDs but I don't mind, they are worth 3 discs:)[/QUOTE]
They're 24-bit WAV files... so will they lose quality if they're converted to 16-bit?
They're 24-bit WAV files... so will they lose quality if they're converted to 16-bit?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]YourValentine wrote: [/QUOTENAME]For some reason I am now able to convert the flacs to wav with FlacFrontend. The files don't fit on 2 CDs but I don't mind, they are worth 3 discs:)[/QUOTE]
They're 24-bit WAV files... so will they lose quality if they're converted to 16-bit?[/QUOTE]
Its going to be lossy (ie information will be lost during the transformation to 16bit)... now a real dilemma for you... :)
They're 24-bit WAV files... so will they lose quality if they're converted to 16-bit?[/QUOTE]
Its going to be lossy (ie information will be lost during the transformation to 16bit)... now a real dilemma for you... :)
Hmmmmmm...
So yeah, in this case, we'll have to keep the FLACs as they are if they are to remain truly lossless.
Ideally, I'd like to fill in the gaps as described by Madman above (thanks for that, Luke!), and share a complete version. But if it would be considered by purists to be lossy, then it'd probably be best not to.
Opinions?
In addition to the cuts noted above, there's also one during Get Down Make Love, at the end of the middle part. But that's the way the original broadcast was. I've had a higher gen copy of this broadcast for years, and the same cut is there.
So yeah, in this case, we'll have to keep the FLACs as they are if they are to remain truly lossless.
Ideally, I'd like to fill in the gaps as described by Madman above (thanks for that, Luke!), and share a complete version. But if it would be considered by purists to be lossy, then it'd probably be best not to.
Opinions?
In addition to the cuts noted above, there's also one during Get Down Make Love, at the end of the middle part. But that's the way the original broadcast was. I've had a higher gen copy of this broadcast for years, and the same cut is there.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hmmmmmm...
So yeah, in this case, we'll have to keep the FLACs as they are if they are to remain truly lossless.
Ideally, I'd like to fill in the gaps as described by Madman above (thanks for that, Luke!), and share a complete version. But if it would be considered by purists to be lossy, then it'd probably be best not to.
Opinions?
In addition to the cuts noted above, there's also one during Get Down Make Love, at the end of the middle part.
[/QUOTE]
Im sure most like me have fullfaith in what you can do with it, if you can put it all together that would be great.
So yeah, in this case, we'll have to keep the FLACs as they are if they are to remain truly lossless.
Ideally, I'd like to fill in the gaps as described by Madman above (thanks for that, Luke!), and share a complete version. But if it would be considered by purists to be lossy, then it'd probably be best not to.
Opinions?
In addition to the cuts noted above, there's also one during Get Down Make Love, at the end of the middle part.
[/QUOTE]
Im sure most like me have fullfaith in what you can do with it, if you can put it all together that would be great.
Hi, Fellas!
You´re welcome, I´ll find some rare things like this.
But, PLEASE, keep seeding after finish the download, help me to keep this on much time is possible.
You´re welcome, I´ll find some rare things like this.
But, PLEASE, keep seeding after finish the download, help me to keep this on much time is possible.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]lbarzi wrote: [/QUOTENAME]But, PLEASE, keep seeding after finish the download, help me to keep this on much time is possible.[/QUOTE]
I am, I am!
I am, I am!
Thanks for sharing.
Oh Yeah I'm keep to seeding since 17/04..but I'm a little bit sad because I try with anyway to edit these files but without succes...24-bit big noise; 16-bit big noise..like a train..well..I must wait for an helpin' hand!"
:-)
:-)
Thank-you from me too! :o)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hmmmmmm...
So yeah, in this case, we'll have to keep the FLACs as they are if they are to remain truly lossless.
Ideally, I'd like to fill in the gaps as described by Madman above (thanks for that, Luke!), and share a complete version. But if it would be considered by purists to be lossy, then it'd probably be best not to.
Opinions?[/QUOTE]
Obviously you cannot burn a standard audio CD from 24 bit WAV files, as the audio CD standard is 16 bit 44 khz. 24 bit wordlenght is used when transferring analog sources, because it allows for a better approximation to the original source than mastering @ 16 bit, i.e. better quality.
In order to burn an audio CD from 24 bit files you need to convert them to 16 bit in a process called 'dithering'. Any decent audio editing program can do this, but there is definately a big difference in quality between dithering schemes. In any case dithering means loss of audio information, i.e. it's lossy so to speak, but since 16 bit is still the accepted quality standard, it should be ok to convert them to 16 bit. 24 bit is the standard for DVD-Audio, but there are still very few people who have the proper playback equipement to benefit from the quality improvement of 24 bit.
So IMO the original 24 bit files should be archived until more people can handle them properly and for now a patched 16 bit version should be created.
So yeah, in this case, we'll have to keep the FLACs as they are if they are to remain truly lossless.
Ideally, I'd like to fill in the gaps as described by Madman above (thanks for that, Luke!), and share a complete version. But if it would be considered by purists to be lossy, then it'd probably be best not to.
Opinions?[/QUOTE]
Obviously you cannot burn a standard audio CD from 24 bit WAV files, as the audio CD standard is 16 bit 44 khz. 24 bit wordlenght is used when transferring analog sources, because it allows for a better approximation to the original source than mastering @ 16 bit, i.e. better quality.
In order to burn an audio CD from 24 bit files you need to convert them to 16 bit in a process called 'dithering'. Any decent audio editing program can do this, but there is definately a big difference in quality between dithering schemes. In any case dithering means loss of audio information, i.e. it's lossy so to speak, but since 16 bit is still the accepted quality standard, it should be ok to convert them to 16 bit. 24 bit is the standard for DVD-Audio, but there are still very few people who have the proper playback equipement to benefit from the quality improvement of 24 bit.
So IMO the original 24 bit files should be archived until more people can handle them properly and for now a patched 16 bit version should be created.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]YourValentine wrote: [/QUOTENAME]For some reason I am now able to convert the flacs to wav with FlacFrontend. The files don't fit on 2 CDs but I don't mind, they are worth 3 discs:)[/QUOTE]
3 discs? Are you sure?
I converted mine and burned them in 2 discs.
WAV 2117 kb/s
44100 HZ
Take care
3 discs? Are you sure?
I converted mine and burned them in 2 discs.
WAV 2117 kb/s
44100 HZ
Take care