[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dusta wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Though, I suppose that, reading this out of context, as you have quoted it, a reader might be inclined to see a distant relationship between your post and this one, if the reader had not followed the threads in question.
[/QUOTE]
KA-CHIIIIING
Well since I've only been wailing about 'context' the entire time, I'm glad it dawned on SOMEBODY.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Okay, so, now you've lost me, completely...but, you know what? That's OKAY!!!
When I spoke of context, I was referring to the fact that Mr Nester's post came in direct response to a thread about the possibility of gay sex scenes in the mythical Freddy film.
Your posts about AIDs and, Taking It In The Arse were posted in direct response to...what, exactly? Was someone trying to work out an answer to the question, "Gay sex: How is it done?" Or, "What was that thing that Freddie died of?"
I'm just trying to work out why you think it makes sense to claim that you were not making jokes(though, earlier in this thread, you claim to be engaging in,'Black Humour,'), but, were being INFORMATIVE, based on context...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dusta wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Though, I suppose that, reading this out of context, as you have quoted it, a reader might be inclined to see a distant relationship between your post and this one, if the reader had not followed the threads in question.
[/QUOTE]
KA-CHIIIIING
Well since I've only been wailing about 'context' the entire time, I'm glad it dawned on SOMEBODY.[/QUOTE]
When I spoke of context, I was referring to the fact that Mr Nester's post came in direct response to a thread about the possibility of gay sex scenes in the mythical Freddy film.
Your posts about AIDs and, Taking It In The Arse were posted in direct response to...what, exactly? Was someone trying to work out an answer to the question, "Gay sex: How is it done?" Or, "What was that thing that Freddie died of?"
I'm just trying to work out why you think it makes sense to claim that you were not making jokes(though, earlier in this thread, you claim to be engaging in,'Black Humour,'), but, were being INFORMATIVE, based on context...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dusta wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Though, I suppose that, reading this out of context, as you have quoted it, a reader might be inclined to see a distant relationship between your post and this one, if the reader had not followed the threads in question.
[/QUOTE]
KA-CHIIIIING
Well since I've only been wailing about 'context' the entire time, I'm glad it dawned on SOMEBODY.[/QUOTE]
As I recall, they were poor puns designed to get up the nose of Jake or someone else who was being a sissy.
When I went 'KACHING' just now as you mentioned 'context', it was because the true context of what I was posting does not really lie within the thread. I'm pretty sure I wasn't playing any active part in the discussion anymore.
I don't give two shits about how I look in that thread or what you might think of me - and I don't even mean that in a negative way. Go for it, think whatever you want, it's all good!
When I went 'KACHING' just now as you mentioned 'context', it was because the true context of what I was posting does not really lie within the thread. I'm pretty sure I wasn't playing any active part in the discussion anymore.
I don't give two shits about how I look in that thread or what you might think of me - and I don't even mean that in a negative way. Go for it, think whatever you want, it's all good!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fatty wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Freddie and I wonder about gravy. cock.[/QUOTE]
Interesting!
Interesting!
Well, alrighty then! This officially completes my bizaare quest in a strange land. You may, or, may not, be a homophobe, you may, or, may not be joking, and, you may, or, may not, be randomly informative.
I can live with that. I was hoping for clarity...but, not achingly so. You can't always get what you want.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]As I recall, they were poor puns designed to get up the nose of Jake or someone else who was being a sissy.
When I went 'KACHING' just now as you mentioned 'context', it was because the true context of what I was posting does not really lie within the thread. I'm pretty sure I wasn't playing any active part in the discussion anymore.
I don't give two shits about how I look in that thread or what you might think of me - and I don't even mean that in a negative way. Go for it, think whatever you want, it's all good![/QUOTE]
I can live with that. I was hoping for clarity...but, not achingly so. You can't always get what you want.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]As I recall, they were poor puns designed to get up the nose of Jake or someone else who was being a sissy.
When I went 'KACHING' just now as you mentioned 'context', it was because the true context of what I was posting does not really lie within the thread. I'm pretty sure I wasn't playing any active part in the discussion anymore.
I don't give two shits about how I look in that thread or what you might think of me - and I don't even mean that in a negative way. Go for it, think whatever you want, it's all good![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dusta wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
You may, or, may not, be a homophobe, you may, or, may not be joking, and, you may, or, may not, be randomly informative.
[/QUOTE]
No, that's the point I was trying to make.
If you're in an environment such as this where you do not know for certain what is going on, it's better to have a bit of perspective about it. Instead of flying off the handle like a baby.
You may, or, may not, be a homophobe, you may, or, may not be joking, and, you may, or, may not, be randomly informative.
[/QUOTE]
No, that's the point I was trying to make.
If you're in an environment such as this where you do not know for certain what is going on, it's better to have a bit of perspective about it. Instead of flying off the handle like a baby.
Now, at least this conversation isn't located at the Serious Discussion forum.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Nummer2 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Now, at least this conversation isn't located at the Serious Discussion forum.[/QUOTE]
+1
+1
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Daniel Nester wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
It's as simple as this, Zebonka: I think you write stupid and ignorant things--I try to tell you how you do this with textual analysis, quotations, support from outside sources....
[/QUOTE]
Will you teach me how to write intelligent things on QZ too, Nester?
It's as simple as this, Zebonka: I think you write stupid and ignorant things--I try to tell you how you do this with textual analysis, quotations, support from outside sources....
[/QUOTE]
Will you teach me how to write intelligent things on QZ too, Nester?
I think that he was happy. True he didn't have a wife or kids to carry on the Mercury name, but he was happy. He had his 6 beloved cats, Mary as a girlfriend, a sweet band, money, and godchildren. I can see that times he may have been unhappy, but I think that for the most part he was happy.
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]
fatty is uneducated at HOME!
are you gay fatty...just curious because you know all the love making procedures of a gay
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
Man it's a good thing you didn't use AIDS in your post, otherwise it would've offended someone and it wouldn't have been funny at all.
True story.[/QUOTE]
In today's modern and complex society, it is impossible to say anything without insulting at least three people.
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
Man it's a good thing you didn't use AIDS in your post, otherwise it would've offended someone and it wouldn't have been funny at all.
True story.[/QUOTE]
In today's modern and complex society, it is impossible to say anything without insulting at least three people.