Unknown
ok, thanks.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
bryony
Hello
Can somebody kindly re-post the link to the [b]DVD slipcase artwork[/b] for this ?
I thought I had it but when it came out of the printer it looked like I'd enlarged from a small picture and it looks real bad!
Can somebody kindly re-post the link to the [b]DVD slipcase artwork[/b] for this ?
I thought I had it but when it came out of the printer it looked like I'd enlarged from a small picture and it looks real bad!
queenside
[QUOTE]
[b]bryony wrote: [/b]
Hello
Can somebody kindly re-post the link to the [b]DVD slipcase artwork[/b] for this ?
I thought I had it but when it came out of the printer it looked like I'd enlarged from a small picture and it looks real bad![/QUOTE]
here you are, courtesy of alex s.
[b]bryony wrote: [/b]
Hello
Can somebody kindly re-post the link to the [b]DVD slipcase artwork[/b] for this ?
I thought I had it but when it came out of the printer it looked like I'd enlarged from a small picture and it looks real bad![/QUOTE]
here you are, courtesy of alex s.
bryony
Many Thanks to both of you !!
[img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
[img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
Ale Solan
udpated this artwork for this nice job of Bob!
enjoy!
Jewelcase version
Ale Solan
DVD slipcase version
seegster
seegster
seegster
Please seed....I am stuck at 79.5% and this show is too good to only have 4/5 of! Thank you all!
Negative Creep
Why would anyone transfer any cassette tape at 96kHz? Aside from the fact on a cassette there will be no audio content above 16khz (anything above that is 100% hiss) , chances are the type of mic used wouldn't even have that range and you can't hear above beyond 18khz anyway! There's no point preserving tape hiss.
Someone also claimed "You definitely do hear digital artifacts at 16 bit, as the recording is so good to begin with" - this is utter bollocks.... no human, not even a seasoned mastering engineer, could realisticly identify a 24 bit from a 16 bit downsample. I can understand wanting to archive an analogue recording in the highest digital spec possible, but there's no point distributing something like this recording in such high definition.
Someone also claimed "You definitely do hear digital artifacts at 16 bit, as the recording is so good to begin with" - this is utter bollocks.... no human, not even a seasoned mastering engineer, could realisticly identify a 24 bit from a 16 bit downsample. I can understand wanting to archive an analogue recording in the highest digital spec possible, but there's no point distributing something like this recording in such high definition.
The Real Wizard
^ this would get you crucified at any audiophile forum.
But I agree with you.
In a pro recording studio, higher bitrate and sample rate absolutely does make a difference. But with old cassettes? Absolutely not.
But I agree with you.
In a pro recording studio, higher bitrate and sample rate absolutely does make a difference. But with old cassettes? Absolutely not.
roberto2
please seed
tsrts1972
Any chance to reseed this great upload?
Thx in advance,
Paul
Thx in advance,
Paul
tcc
From Bokkepoot's file:
https://mega.co.nz/#!0JgjjQrR!fK3aDC4vYLfXyYQc2G4O2QmQYKUhgC8J6OZULap27nI
See: http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1313741/renewed-project-complete-queenrelated-concert-collection.aspx?page=8
https://mega.co.nz/#!0JgjjQrR!fK3aDC4vYLfXyYQc2G4O2QmQYKUhgC8J6OZULap27nI
See: http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1313741/renewed-project-complete-queenrelated-concert-collection.aspx?page=8
tsrts1972
This upload is corrupted - the first of audio files is in 24/48 and the rest is 24/96 - does anyone got a 24/96 full copy?