I have a theory that Greg Brooks = Treasured Moment.
Think about it, have you ever seen them together?
Rubbersuit
Thread
Posts in chronological order
emrabt
[QUOTE]
[b]Rubbersuit wrote: [/b]
I have a theory that Greg Brooks = Treasured Moment.
Think about it, have you ever seen them together?
[/QUOTE]
You're too late, I've already explained things [url=http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1218349/treasured-moment-greatest-queenzoner-ever.aspx?page=3]here[/url], currently it's the last post of that topic.
[b]Rubbersuit wrote: [/b]
I have a theory that Greg Brooks = Treasured Moment.
Think about it, have you ever seen them together?
[/QUOTE]
You're too late, I've already explained things [url=http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1218349/treasured-moment-greatest-queenzoner-ever.aspx?page=3]here[/url], currently it's the last post of that topic.
Rubbersuit
I can't argue with that logic.
Any post that namechecks Leo Sayers is instant truth.
Good job!
Any post that namechecks Leo Sayers is instant truth.
Good job!
FriedChicken
[QUOTE]
[b]community wrote: [/b]
. I am a Russian Queen fan and I use a translator to write in English[/QUOTE]
In Soviet Russia, Translator uses YOU!!
[b]community wrote: [/b]
. I am a Russian Queen fan and I use a translator to write in English[/QUOTE]
In Soviet Russia, Translator uses YOU!!
Goodoldfashionedloverboy
Queen Archvist escapes as soon as to him asked questions on the merits-and it is called cowardice. To blow dust into the eyes and minds of fans and went away. But this is not important. And above all, he blatantly lied denigrating talent Queen. As possible, listen to and work in the office of Queen productions and also to talk about that the Queen is not so good and there are groups who work more interesting. He or oppression of the official line Queen production according to which Freddie gay and drug addict and Queen another mediocre team.
Goodoldfashionedloverboy
I am very interested, why since the death of Freddie Mercury was not issued a single rare concert?
Goodoldfashionedloverboy
??? ?????? ?????????, ?????? ? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ???????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?????????
lalaalalaa
You all make good statements to why it shouldn't be a problem to, at least, leak the track onto Youtube or something, but why not just take some action. Go to wherever the Queen gems are located, steal them, then put them on Youtube.
Problem solved ;)
But seriously folks, people are treating these "secret" songs as if they'd destroy the world if we even listened to a 10 second clip of it. It's just a bunch of nonsense not to at least give us something. If it wasn't for us fans, then there wouldn't be any demos to listen to in the first place. We spend our (or our parent's) hard-earned money and buy Queen's albums, T-shirts, merchandise, ect. for what? To be excluded from these tracks we'd all like to hear. There's nothing else to buy from Queen except for the unreleased material, so it's either they lose money for being stupid, or they give the fans what they've wanted for years. I think as fans we are entitled to something extra. I would settle for a few demos a year instead of not getting anything at all and waiting for this so-called anthology. All the major Queen fans will be dead before this stuff even somewhat parcially surfaces.
Problem solved ;)
But seriously folks, people are treating these "secret" songs as if they'd destroy the world if we even listened to a 10 second clip of it. It's just a bunch of nonsense not to at least give us something. If it wasn't for us fans, then there wouldn't be any demos to listen to in the first place. We spend our (or our parent's) hard-earned money and buy Queen's albums, T-shirts, merchandise, ect. for what? To be excluded from these tracks we'd all like to hear. There's nothing else to buy from Queen except for the unreleased material, so it's either they lose money for being stupid, or they give the fans what they've wanted for years. I think as fans we are entitled to something extra. I would settle for a few demos a year instead of not getting anything at all and waiting for this so-called anthology. All the major Queen fans will be dead before this stuff even somewhat parcially surfaces.
Thistle
[QUOTE]
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
Well, I'm saying BULLSHIT.
I don't think it exists with Fred. Why would Michael give the track to Fred if he sang on it? The Jackson estate owns this. Greg's knowledge of the track should IN NO WAY interfere with the operations of the Queen machine. It is not co-owned by Queen so Greg (and Queen) are under no obligation to hide any info from the fans. If they know something, they would not be prevented from saying things like:
"It's a four minute track with vocals by Freddie".
"Brian and Roger have done production work on it"
"Michael said 'it sucks, let's shelve it.'"
The song did not earn any monetary value, as it was never released, finished, etc. No one's estate would be harmed by discussing these facts or non-facts. Sounds to me like Queen or Greg Brooks is simply trying to keep up the illusions that the fans are demanding this, which they're not.[/QUOTE]
The track does exist, with Freddie's vocals, and is complete. In fact, there are at least two versions I know of, and have heard. You all doubted State Of Shock and More To Life Than This, but they "leaked". I have heard the two versions of Victory, several years ago, but cannot - like Greg - disclose the information. More for fear of being killed by QPL and by the guy who played it than because I am holding information back for the sake of it. But please believe me, it is there. Whether or not it gets released is another matter, but it is there - and it is exciting.
Also the one with Andy Gibb on "Play The Game".
Also the tracks is similar vein as "The Great Pretender". This was a leaked tape from Garden Lodge, and I thought that *most* collectors would have at least heard this.
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
Well, I'm saying BULLSHIT.
I don't think it exists with Fred. Why would Michael give the track to Fred if he sang on it? The Jackson estate owns this. Greg's knowledge of the track should IN NO WAY interfere with the operations of the Queen machine. It is not co-owned by Queen so Greg (and Queen) are under no obligation to hide any info from the fans. If they know something, they would not be prevented from saying things like:
"It's a four minute track with vocals by Freddie".
"Brian and Roger have done production work on it"
"Michael said 'it sucks, let's shelve it.'"
The song did not earn any monetary value, as it was never released, finished, etc. No one's estate would be harmed by discussing these facts or non-facts. Sounds to me like Queen or Greg Brooks is simply trying to keep up the illusions that the fans are demanding this, which they're not.[/QUOTE]
The track does exist, with Freddie's vocals, and is complete. In fact, there are at least two versions I know of, and have heard. You all doubted State Of Shock and More To Life Than This, but they "leaked". I have heard the two versions of Victory, several years ago, but cannot - like Greg - disclose the information. More for fear of being killed by QPL and by the guy who played it than because I am holding information back for the sake of it. But please believe me, it is there. Whether or not it gets released is another matter, but it is there - and it is exciting.
Also the one with Andy Gibb on "Play The Game".
Also the tracks is similar vein as "The Great Pretender". This was a leaked tape from Garden Lodge, and I thought that *most* collectors would have at least heard this.
Micrówave
Well, Thistleboy, I'm calling you out now.
You're afraid of QPL and the guy who played it? What do you think they will do? How would they know it's you? You could create a Treasure Michael account and disclose "this" information. And no, the world would not stop revolving if you did. And I doubt a street fight would break out between you and Jim Beach.
There's a duet with Wang Chung that Freddie did, too. I can't tell you anymore, because I'm afraid the guy who played it for me won't play other rare, unused 20 year old songs for me the next time I visit. Bullshit.
You're afraid of QPL and the guy who played it? What do you think they will do? How would they know it's you? You could create a Treasure Michael account and disclose "this" information. And no, the world would not stop revolving if you did. And I doubt a street fight would break out between you and Jim Beach.
There's a duet with Wang Chung that Freddie did, too. I can't tell you anymore, because I'm afraid the guy who played it for me won't play other rare, unused 20 year old songs for me the next time I visit. Bullshit.
Crazy LittleThing
[QUOTE]
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
In summary,
Greg Brooks = Dick Cheney
Victory (with Queen) = The Weapons Of Mass Destruction in Iraq.[/QUOTE]
Micrówave wrote: Greg Brooks = Dick Cheney
I wrote: Wouldn't that make him Darth Brooks? Someone get that man a giant hat!
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
In summary,
Greg Brooks = Dick Cheney
Victory (with Queen) = The Weapons Of Mass Destruction in Iraq.[/QUOTE]
Micrówave wrote: Greg Brooks = Dick Cheney
I wrote: Wouldn't that make him Darth Brooks? Someone get that man a giant hat!
Thistle
[QUOTE]
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
Well, Thistleboy, I'm calling you out now.
You're afraid of QPL and the guy who played it? What do you think they will do? How would they know it's you? You could create a Treasure Michael account and disclose "this" information. And no, the world would not stop revolving if you did. And I doubt a street fight would break out between you and Jim Beach.
There's a duet with Wang Chung that Freddie did, too. I can't tell you anymore, because I'm afraid the guy who played it for me won't play other rare, unused 20 year old songs for me the next time I visit. Bullshit.[/QUOTE]
OK Microwave, first of all, call me "out"? What the hell is that meant to be? Do you think you're watching some WWE programme or something? Call me out? LOL.
Back on topic, what do you need to know? (actually, you don't [i]need[/i] to know anything, so I'll rephrase....what would you like to know?) Other than that I've heard the tracks and they exist in full form, with Freddie and Michael clearly heard together, I can't tell you more. To you, there is only black and white. You're not a thinker, you don't see things outside the box. I used to be like that, I can understand, but you also have to understand that you can't know everything and don't need to know everything. If you don't believe they're there, fine - I know better. I don't have to prove myself, and I certainly won't name names. Going back to you not thinking outside the box, I'm not [i]actually[/i] worried about QPL, but this sort of thing could get messy for the guy who actually managed to uncover the tracks. I know of examples before. I'm not saying who it is or where it came from, you don't need to know - I'm merely saying it is there, in great quality and as people would hope, with FM and MJ together vocally.
In order to know these things you have to know people in the know. You have to get out there and widen your circle of friends. I mean real friends, not cyber chat with somebody you''re never actually going to know. And in order to do that, you have to peel yourself away from your spunk stained laptop and actually go out. It's called socialising and getting a life. I doubt you'd understand, Microwave.
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
Well, Thistleboy, I'm calling you out now.
You're afraid of QPL and the guy who played it? What do you think they will do? How would they know it's you? You could create a Treasure Michael account and disclose "this" information. And no, the world would not stop revolving if you did. And I doubt a street fight would break out between you and Jim Beach.
There's a duet with Wang Chung that Freddie did, too. I can't tell you anymore, because I'm afraid the guy who played it for me won't play other rare, unused 20 year old songs for me the next time I visit. Bullshit.[/QUOTE]
OK Microwave, first of all, call me "out"? What the hell is that meant to be? Do you think you're watching some WWE programme or something? Call me out? LOL.
Back on topic, what do you need to know? (actually, you don't [i]need[/i] to know anything, so I'll rephrase....what would you like to know?) Other than that I've heard the tracks and they exist in full form, with Freddie and Michael clearly heard together, I can't tell you more. To you, there is only black and white. You're not a thinker, you don't see things outside the box. I used to be like that, I can understand, but you also have to understand that you can't know everything and don't need to know everything. If you don't believe they're there, fine - I know better. I don't have to prove myself, and I certainly won't name names. Going back to you not thinking outside the box, I'm not [i]actually[/i] worried about QPL, but this sort of thing could get messy for the guy who actually managed to uncover the tracks. I know of examples before. I'm not saying who it is or where it came from, you don't need to know - I'm merely saying it is there, in great quality and as people would hope, with FM and MJ together vocally.
In order to know these things you have to know people in the know. You have to get out there and widen your circle of friends. I mean real friends, not cyber chat with somebody you''re never actually going to know. And in order to do that, you have to peel yourself away from your spunk stained laptop and actually go out. It's called socialising and getting a life. I doubt you'd understand, Microwave.
emrabt
[QUOTE]
[b]Thistleboy 1980 wrote: [/b]
Back on topic, what do you need to know? (actually, you don't [i]need[/i] to know anything, so I'll rephrase....what would you like to know?) Other than that I've heard the tracks and they exist in full form, with Freddie and Michael clearly heard together, I can't tell you more. To you, there is only black and white. You're not a thinker, you don't see things outside the box. I used to be like that, I can understand, but you also have to understand that you can't know everything and don't need to know everything. If you don't believe they're there, fine - I know better. I don't have to prove myself, and I certainly won't name names. Going back to you not thinking outside the box, I'm not [i]actually[/i] worried about QPL, but this sort of thing could get messy for the guy who actually managed to uncover the tracks. I know of examples before. I'm not saying who it is or where it came from, you don't need to know - I'm merely saying it is there, in great quality and as people would hope, with FM and MJ together vocally.
[/QUOTE]
Or to rephrase, in my own confusing way :
The speculation around the tracks, is not to be speculated upon anymore, Thistleboy has, he alleges, heard of and played the track which has been speculated about during parts of this thread. So in his opinion, if it’s to be believed, without naming names, the track with both vocals, is in fine enough quality to be released possibly in the near or maybe in the distant future.
Now knowing the things you know, about people in the know, Thistleboy knows people who maybe, could have uncovered the track, in a possible messy way. But not knowing who he knows, and him not caring what people think, these people he knows will not get in to trouble over the uncover.
so I think we have clear proof?
[b]Thistleboy 1980 wrote: [/b]
Back on topic, what do you need to know? (actually, you don't [i]need[/i] to know anything, so I'll rephrase....what would you like to know?) Other than that I've heard the tracks and they exist in full form, with Freddie and Michael clearly heard together, I can't tell you more. To you, there is only black and white. You're not a thinker, you don't see things outside the box. I used to be like that, I can understand, but you also have to understand that you can't know everything and don't need to know everything. If you don't believe they're there, fine - I know better. I don't have to prove myself, and I certainly won't name names. Going back to you not thinking outside the box, I'm not [i]actually[/i] worried about QPL, but this sort of thing could get messy for the guy who actually managed to uncover the tracks. I know of examples before. I'm not saying who it is or where it came from, you don't need to know - I'm merely saying it is there, in great quality and as people would hope, with FM and MJ together vocally.
[/QUOTE]
Or to rephrase, in my own confusing way :
The speculation around the tracks, is not to be speculated upon anymore, Thistleboy has, he alleges, heard of and played the track which has been speculated about during parts of this thread. So in his opinion, if it’s to be believed, without naming names, the track with both vocals, is in fine enough quality to be released possibly in the near or maybe in the distant future.
Now knowing the things you know, about people in the know, Thistleboy knows people who maybe, could have uncovered the track, in a possible messy way. But not knowing who he knows, and him not caring what people think, these people he knows will not get in to trouble over the uncover.
so I think we have clear proof?
Thistle
[QUOTE]
[b]emrabt wrote:
[/b]
Or to rephrase, in my own way :
The speculation around the tracks, is not to be speculated upon anymore, Thistleboy has, he alleges, heard of and played the track which has been speculated about during parts of this thread. So in his opinion, if it’s to be believed, without naming names, the track with both vocals, is in fine enough quality to be released possibly in the near or maybe in the distant future.
Now knowing the things you know, about people in the know, Thistleboy knows people who maybe, could have uncovered the track, in a possible messy way. But not knowing who he knows, and him not caring what people think, these people he knows will not get in to trouble over the uncover.
so I think we have clear proof?
[/QUOTE]
You get most of the point emrabt, but missed it on the part that you think it would not cause trouble for the person who got the tracks. it definitely would. I don't give a flying fuck about QPL, but I wouldn't drop anyone else in it. All that needs to be said is the tracks are there and could definitely be used as part of an official release. But we all know it probably won't happen - all I wanted to say was don't doubt they're in the "archives".
[b]emrabt wrote:
[/b]
Or to rephrase, in my own way :
The speculation around the tracks, is not to be speculated upon anymore, Thistleboy has, he alleges, heard of and played the track which has been speculated about during parts of this thread. So in his opinion, if it’s to be believed, without naming names, the track with both vocals, is in fine enough quality to be released possibly in the near or maybe in the distant future.
Now knowing the things you know, about people in the know, Thistleboy knows people who maybe, could have uncovered the track, in a possible messy way. But not knowing who he knows, and him not caring what people think, these people he knows will not get in to trouble over the uncover.
so I think we have clear proof?
[/QUOTE]
You get most of the point emrabt, but missed it on the part that you think it would not cause trouble for the person who got the tracks. it definitely would. I don't give a flying fuck about QPL, but I wouldn't drop anyone else in it. All that needs to be said is the tracks are there and could definitely be used as part of an official release. But we all know it probably won't happen - all I wanted to say was don't doubt they're in the "archives".
Goodoldfashionedloverboy
Freddie Mercury was gay and was not a drug addict. and you are here staged a debate on that Freddie was gay and a drug addict