By that perspective, they should also leak all multi-tracks, lest they ever lose some more (one of my favourite songs, [i]All Dead[/i], is reportedly missing from the archives). And while they're at it, they should also let everybody had access to their manuscripts, the songs' original tracksheets, Brian's deciduous teeth and [b]Roger's pubic hair[/b] (after all, those who wanted to have Freddie's missed their chance, except maybe some former lovers).
I mean, in a perfect world all of that would happen (except for the teeh/hair thing), but there are many things involved. If QP want to save [i]Hangman[/i] and other things for a potential upcoming release (once their collaborations with alleged Fred's favourites or American Idol losers stop selling), I suppose they're willing to take the risk. Having those things leaked would compromise the success of a commercially profitable product.
As for John, IIRC, he once referred to [i]Hangman[/i] as his retirement or something like that. That's also understandable, and indeed, looking at the picture, it benefits way more to keep it to himself than to share it just to prove he's got it. After all, if he (or anybody else) had uploaded it to Torrent, YT, Napster or whatever (yes, which year am I in?) ten years ago, would it be so often commented about? Would it have its own thread with several replies? Would most people even care about it?
Myself, while I don't regard [i]Hangman[/i] as a masterpiece or something that's gonna change my life for ever, I still think highly of the song and am interested in knowing how it'd sound like once given the studio treatment. If I ever get to hear it, it'll be gr8. And hopefully, we will, eventually. If three years ago somebody'd time-travelled and told us we'd be able to play Roy Baker with the [i]Bo Rhap[/i] multi's, I think 99.99% would've said 'the bloody f*ck are you talking about?'. So there you have it.
[/QUOTE]
Speaking of perverted things, I know a female member on this forum who has a thong with photo of Freddie's face on it. It's pretty funny, but I'd certainly couldn't find that attractive if I was in a situation with that person.
theCro · Member since
Mr. Stuart - is there any chanse we can expect from you to send Hangman to some of us here at forums so it can be rerleased as free download for Queen fans? :)
Saint Jiub · Member since
Are you willing to reimburse the original purchase price previously invested in this unique item?
theCro · Member since
Panchgani wrote: Are you willing to reimburse the original purchase price previously invested in this unique item?
say how much do you want for it
andreas_mercury · Member since
calm down, he does not have hangman or even a photo of it.
Saint Jiub · Member since
A photo of a white label acetate? What would that prove?
theCro - I originally paid about $1100 for it. If you like, I can sell it to you for $500 if you promise to never share a decent copy with Greg Brooks. Therefore, if you intend to share it, you must promise to share it only as a 128 kbs mp3.
pittrek · Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Panchgani wrote:[/QUOTENAME] A photo of a white label acetate? What would that prove?
theCro - I originally paid about $1100 for it. If you like, I can sell it to you for $500 if you promise to never share a decent copy with Greg Brooks. Therefore, if you intend to share it, you must promise to share it only as a 128 kbs mp3. [/QUOTE]
Please, don't write this stuff here. There are people like me, who WOULD pay $500 for a copy :-)
Unknown
andreas_mercury · Member since
something that we do know for sure is that mister stuart does not have any recording of it that doesnt exist out here.
silver_salmon · Member since
John if you have a copy of Hangman studio version, send a copy to Greg with your voice each 10 seconds:
"Property of John Stuart.....Property of John Stuart.....Property of John Stuart.....Property of John Stuart....."
I know that is a really collector peace but i never be sure about if it exists, can you only confirm if Hangman exists in studio? :)
inu-liger · Member since
andreas_mercury wrote: something that we do know for sure is that mister stuart does not have any recording of it that doesnt exist out here. ======================================
And your own personal proof in the pudding lies WHERE exactly?
Yeah, I thought so...
Jam Monkey · Member since
pittrek wrote:
Panchgani wrote: A photo of a white label acetate? What would that prove?
theCro - I originally paid about $1100 for it. If you like, I can sell it to you for $500 if you promise to never share a decent copy with Greg Brooks. Therefore, if you intend to share it, you must promise to share it only as a 128 kbs mp3.
Please, don't write this stuff here. There are people like me, who WOULD pay $500 for a copy :-) I'll give you $1000
Saint Jiub · Member since
Obvioiusly, I do not have the Hangman acetate. I intended it as a smart ass comment to theCro
theCro · Member since
Jam Monkey wrote: pittrek wrote:
Panchgani wrote: A photo of a white label acetate? What would that prove?
theCro - I originally paid about $1100 for it. If you like, I can sell it to you for $500 if you promise to never share a decent copy with Greg Brooks. Therefore, if you intend to share it, you must promise to share it only as a 128 kbs mp3.
Please, don't write this stuff here. There are people like me, who WOULD pay $500 for a copy :-) I'll give you $1000
lol
i would pay $1000 for it for sure :)
but since (it seems) no one has it... then nothing :/
andreas_mercury · Member since
no one has it as it is simple a hoax. same as the sunbury video which all of you seemed to go in so easily ..... gullibility.
