Djdownsy wrote:
I didn't know him personally but from his interviews he doesn't seem like an amazing person to me. More like ... well some things are better left unsaid :-)
Go on, elaborate. I'm curious...
Djdownsy wrote:
I didn't know him personally but from his interviews he doesn't seem like an amazing person to me. More like ... well some things are better left unsaid :-)
MercuryVenus wrote: Freddie could join any other band without Brian ,Roger and John and become popular and very famous easily
I think this one summs it up.
He would sooner or later shine and carry the band to a new level .
In the case of Queen we had also to do with some extra decent men and musicians so the resault was truly one of kind and really nice to witnses.
Just the right amount of ingridients.
Brian, Roger and John made Mercury an even bigger superstar that perhaps any other ensemble of bandmates would ever be capable of, becouse they were intelligent, self conscious individuals.
Mercury's over the top idiosynchrasity may have lead to dubious resaults (untamed charisma), if his colligs had lets say the same amount of musicianship but lacked the extra dimension that was brought by those educated, refined and intelligent bandnates and friends.
Holly2003 wrote:
I prefer to think of Queen now as like a foot. Freddie was the foot's big toe, but had to be amputated because err... he had frostbite and developed gangrene while climbing Mt. Everest or something. Lambert is an ankle bracelet. So Queen are now like a old foot without a big toe, but with an ankle bracelet. Not as good, obviously missing something intrinsic, a bit unbalanced, and like all other things English, completely useless at football.