A comparison of Live at the Rainbow (2014) and previous versions

[QUOTE] [b]Nitroboy wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE]

[b]GinjaNinja wrote: [/b] Was there ever any explanation behind the exclusion of "Big Spender" and "Bama Lama Loo" on this release?[/QUOTE]

Royalties I believe?[/QUOTE]

Big Spender was included on the November disc though.

The march disc have 64 minutes, there is space to put Big Spender and Bama Lama Loo.

What I think:
Bama Lama Loo: the owners of the rights asked too high in royalties.
Big Spender : the owners of the rights asked twice than the other, for the track was in the two shows, agreed to put on the November show to have video pictures.

[QUOTE]

[b]Nitroboy wrote: [/b] [QUOTE]

[b]Nitroboy wrote: [/b] Liar from November is an odd thing.
It has been concluded that the video release uses the performance from the 19th, but the 3-song soundboard recording shared by Sikke a couple of years ago, doesn't fully match up with the video. It's longer than the video, because it seems to have a completely different middle section.[/QUOTE]

Could someone help me out here? :P[/QUOTE]

Anyone? It seems odd that the stereo soundboard is so much longer, and different in the bridge.

[QUOTE] [b]bootLuca wrote:[/b]

this!
Attachment: 20159221069193953.jpg 176 KB
[/QUOTE]


I notice now that there's written "no" near Big Spender and "Encore 1"
If this note was written at the time and not added in 2014, couldn't it indicate that the tapes are damaged for these two tracks?

According to Rosemary Horide (?)'s review they played a second rock'n'roll medley so it probably WAS played, but indeed, the "no" can mean they were either not recorded or the recording is not usable

It seems odd that they would not record the first encore, but record the second.

Probably the same as the Hammersmith encore? They knew it wasn't going to be used so rather than someone spending the money to record it, then just stopped. Tight budget etc.

[QUOTE]

[b]dysan wrote: [/b] Probably the same as the Hammersmith encore? They knew it wasn't going to be used so rather than someone spending the money to record it, then just stopped. Tight budget etc.[/QUOTE]

No, Hammersmith '75 was due to the contract/union with the camera crew. They weren't allowed to record the last encore, due to time constraints.

Same difference buddy.

[QUOTE] [b]Nitroboy wrote:[/b]

It seems odd that they would not record the first encore, but record the second.[/QUOTE]

maybe there was some issue during the first encore and the recording is damaged

[QUOTE]

[b]dysan wrote: [/b] Same difference buddy.[/QUOTE]

Far from it.
It would have been illegal to hold the camera crew for the 2nd encore.