Complete list of material NOT for share

[QUOTE] [b]BETA215 wrote:[/b] [/QUOTE] HAHAHA!! Best response ever. Isn't one of those from Mr Holland's Opus?

Not taking sides, but that response was pretty epic. Love it :)

[QUOTE] [b]tero! 48531 wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]

^ dude, give it up. You're becoming like Panchgani now, repeating the same old mantra. We get it.

Be the change you wish to see in the world.

If you don't like the way it is, then get off your soapbox and actually spend your time building relationships with people and accumulating new things. And then share them here.
[/QUOTE]

Do you get it, or are you just tired when somebody actually disagrees with the traders?

I have no desire to get involved in the trading circles after seeing what kind of person I would have to be, but no-one's stopping you from trading.

Just don't try to enforce your code of "honour among the thieves" onto QZ and everything will be fine.[/QUOTE]

I understand completely. I need to be "weeded out" (your words) because I am not a collector, and my opinions have not met your lordship's approval.

[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
I am responsible for over 100 new recordings ending up on Queenzone.

You are responsible for zero.

You talk quite the talk for someone who has done absolutely nothing to contribute to the well being of this place and online music collecting in general. You are merely caught in your illusions of what you think music collecting is. This thread and everything you post on this matter is but noise.

I await your cheerful reply.
[/QUOTE]

This is your biggest problem.

To you QZ is only the "Sharing The Music - Announce" section (and posting concerts when they've lost their value in the trading circles).

Everything else is worth zero, and everyone else is worth zero. It doesn't matter how much you participate in the actual conversation, or how much effort you put into constructing logical arguments.
The only thing that matters is how many shows you can share.


I actually I feel sorry for you.

If you have this same level of contempt for any poster who doesn't share concerts of QZ, there's no way you can enjoy this site.

^ I know The Real Wizard in real life. He's absolutely not who you're painting him to be.

If the last line of your post is true - then he wouldn't be a friend of mine and he'd look down on me.

[QUOTE] [b]tero! 48531 wrote:[/b]

To you QZ is only the "Sharing The Music - Announce" section (and posting concerts when they've lost their value in the trading circles).[/QUOTE]
Incorrect. Most recordings are freely traded. Only a select few have some kind of rarity status that presents challenges in acquiring and spreading them. Or have you missed the threads on this very forum with people exchanging samples of videos and then someone joyfully posts the best of the bunch?

So you can breathe better now knowing that this section of the forum does exist from a place of openness and generosity. But I look forward to your pending spin on how this still somehow makes me (and all other music collectors) a bad person.

Even still, who's to say there isn't a sense of joy in posting a recording, no matter the circumstances? Where does this sense of entitlement come from whereby the process must be something that you agree with, and the person posting a recording must be undergoing a certain emotional experience that you agree with? Who are you to judge what their motivations are?

[QUOTE]If you have this same level of contempt for any poster who doesn't share concerts of QZ, there's no way you can enjoy this site.[/QUOTE]
I don't have contempt for people who don't contribute. Most people here are kind and friendly and interaction with them is enjoyable.

I have contempt for people who don't contribute *and openly slander those who do*, and pretend to be experts in something they're not.

See the difference?

All you know about music collecting is a few cherry picked tidbits you've read about on this site. I bet you're an expert on cooking too, because you've watched the chefs from your table at a few restaurants.

It's me who feels sorry for you. You're like those anti-vaxxers who tell immunologists and doctors that you know more about medical science than they do because the internet says so. Ignorance is the best card in your deck. You think you are so intelligent and articulate, but by painting every single person in this world who posts music online with the same brush you couldn't be more of a fool.

[QUOTE]

[b]tero! 48531 wrote: [/b]

This is your biggest problem.

To you QZ is only the "Sharing The Music - Announce" section (and posting concerts when they've lost their value in the trading circles).

Everything else is worth zero, and everyone else is worth zero. It doesn't matter how much you participate in the actual conversation, or how much effort you put into constructing logical arguments.
The only thing that matters is how many shows you can share.

I actually I feel sorry for you.

If you have this same level of contempt for any poster who doesn't share concerts of QZ, there's no way you can enjoy this site.[/QUOTE]

How you could deduct that?

Please, read "The Power Of Persuassion". There are more important things to bother than this topic.

Nah, I know Bob too and I'm not in the trading circle.

I've posted a few demo upgrades before, and one show (thanks to Marknow) that was previously not available here. Other than that, I have nothing to give - but Bob has helped me out with a lot of stuff, stood in my corner when I've needed him, and donated to causes I've supported.

You may not see eye to eye, but he's definitely not what you've portrayed him to be here, tero. The man has spent a lot of his time working on, and maintaining, the most comprehensive database of info on Queen shows on the web, contributes greatly to this forum, and tirelessly works on shares (whether that be upgrades, speed corrections, merges or completely new shares). And he still finds time to go out and entertain on that red special!

If he really looked down on us, there wouldn't be any of that. So what if there's a few gems he's "held back"? Should he not try and gain some reward for the time he's put in sourcing things? I don't see that his shares are us getting the things that longer have no value - I see that as progress. You need to hold back on some things to try and use them as leverage on deals before making the freely available, or else more gems will not be unearthed. Simple, really.

[QUOTE] [b]Thistleboy1980 wrote:[/b]

Nah, I know Bob too and I'm not in the trading circle.[/QUOTE]

Stop saying nice things about me.

You heard the man - employ that binary thinking ! I'm supposed to be hating everyone who doesn't live their life exactly like I do.

^ I know. You're a c**t, really.

After you killed my family, shot my dog in front of me, raped my wife and then set my Hangman acetate on fire, I don't know why I tried to make you out to be cool.

Stockholm syndrome?

Muse are great ;)

I knew you'd say that.

[QUOTE]

[b]Thistleboy1980 wrote: [/b] Nah, I know Bob too and I'm not in the trading circle.

there's a few gems he's "held back"
[/QUOTE]

Don't make me jealous! 8B