Queen crest Queenzone

Concerts For The People of Kampuchea [2015 edition]

111 posts Page 2 of 8
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Hey peeps, here you have the whole artwork, including CD labels in case you want 'em more artwork to follow in the next few days
Queen artwork (& others): *new Flickr* https://www.flickr.com/photos/183449549@N02/albums
· Member since
Next: Also a 2CD version from Kampuchea including only the Queen gig.
Queen artwork (& others): *new Flickr* https://www.flickr.com/photos/183449549@N02/albums
· Member since
Excellent set. Thanks a lot!
QUEEN EXPANDED COLLECTION: http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1456202/queen-expanded-studio-collection-cmi-music.aspx
· Member since
Thank you so much for all your hard work! A few questions:

I haven't listened through the whole Queen set, but I noticed it's a little shorter than your previous version. What's missing just out of curiosity?
What exactly are these watermarks?
Is there any difference in the sound quality of the audience tape between this and the previous version?
Is there a secret non-watermarked version for a few selected trusted individuals? (jk)
ARISTIDE1 FUCK OFF :^)
· Member since
grande
· Member since
grande
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]MackMantilla wrote:[/b]

Great work, Pittrek!

I think I have a DVD with the full (?) The Who set. I would be a better source than the one from YouTube.[/QUOTE]

Sounds interesting.
Is the audio lossless? I think my source had ac3 audio. Does your DVD have better quality?
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
Thank you for your kindness and dedication. Cheers!
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Sue Dounim wrote:[/b]

Thank you so much for all your hard work! A few questions:

I haven't listened through the whole Queen set, but I noticed it's a little shorter than your previous version. What's missing just out of curiosity?
What exactly are these watermarks?
Is there any difference in the sound quality of the audience tape between this and the previous version?
Is there a secret non-watermarked version for a few selected trusted individuals? (jk)[/QUOTE]

This version should play faster than the previous version, I think it's the only time-related change. Unless I forgot some gap between songs. Nothing should be "intentionally" missing.

I'm glad you don't know what I meant with the "watermarks" :)

No, there's no "non-watermarked version". As I said, it's just a couple of "imperfections", a.k.a. "things which I could do better but they're good enough for me so I leave them there - at least I can use them as [i]watermarks[/i]"
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
And you're all welcome of course
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
Thanks pittrek. Amazing sharing.
· Member since
Thanks pittrek ! What an amazing research and time that you have put into this project. Thanks for sharing this with us.
check: http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1313741/queenzone-queenconcerts-database-version-9-is-online.aspx Most recent overview (Version 9 - Releasedate: 01-01-2016): http://bit.ly/1mTisKr
· Member since
Thanks for this huge share and the nice artwork as well. Maybe Ididn't read completely but I wonder if the Queen part is any different from your previous upload?

regards
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]thefallenqueen wrote:[/b]

Thanks for this huge share and the nice artwork as well. Maybe Ididn't read completely but I wonder if the Queen part is any different from your previous upload or only CLTCL?

regards[/QUOTE]
· Member since
Yes, it's (almost) completely different. A different equalization for the audience source, a new video source (better and longer), new soundboard sources, better speed correction, better merge/matrix process...
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1