Demand the truth from QP about Freddies secret Aids movies

[QUOTE]

[b]AlexRocks wrote: [/b] Oh, my god The Real Wizard is a Real Loser! Lol.[/QUOTE]

That's really clever! Did you come up with that all by yourself?

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnibHBkDFO4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnibHBkDFO4[/url]

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvXJnukCFoo&t=339s]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvXJnukCFoo&t=339s[/url]

 Congrats USA. Your education is in the hands of a total moron.

[QUOTE]

[b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b][/QUOTE] [QUOTE][b] [/b][/QUOTE] [QUOTE][b] [/b]Vox [b][i]- LEFT BIAS[/i][/b]  [/QUOTE] [QUOTE] The Atlantic  [b][i]- Left-Center Bias[/i][/b] 
New York Times [b][i]- Left-Center Bias[/i][/b]
Washington Post  [b][i]- Left-Center Bias [/i][/b]
The Guardian  [b][i]- Left-Center Bias[/i][/b] 
Slate [i][b]- LEFT BIAS[/b][/i] 
NPR  [b][i]- Left-Center Bias[/i][/b] 

These are the most unbiased news sources I've found in the US. They are all examples of quality, thoughtful investigative journalism.

Just about everything else is too polarized to either side. And as long as we trust fact checkers, they would almost certainly agree with me. [/QUOTE]

...

[url=https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/]https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/[/url]

According to "Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC News)", all seven of the "suggested" websites bend toward the left, with Slate and Vox being the polar opposite equivalent of Breitbart and Fox News.

In my opinion, The Guardian Post and the Washington Post are generally reasonable publications despite their leftward bent.  The other five are "lame" in my opinion.

The "Least Biased" sites I consider generally reasonable would include the Associated Press, Factcheck.org, Pew Research, Politifact, Reuters, and Snopes.

Ah, so you admit that politifact is neutral. Good. Does that also mean that you agree that about 70% of the claims that Trump has made during his campaign were completely or mostly false? And that for Hillary Clinton, this percentage was less than 30%?

[QUOTE] [b]Panchgani wrote:[/b]

[url=https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/]https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/[/url]
[/QUOTE]
http://www.dailynewsbin.com/news/phony-security-site-media-bias-fact-check-is-just-one-guy-running-a-malicious-scam/26758

[QUOTE]The "Least Biased" sites I consider generally reasonable would include the Associated Press, Factcheck.org, Pew Research, Politifact, Reuters, and Snopes.[/QUOTE]
If you rely on Politifact and Snopes, then how in the world are you a Republican? They regularly tear the right wing agenda a new one. Something's not adding up here.

[QUOTE] [b]andres_clip wrote:[/b]

. . . .Shame on you, I thought listening to Queen was about joy and no racism/bullying and all that merry go round but you as a true globalist show your face. Should start listening to some other group that suit your agenda better. [/QUOTE]

If this is truly what you believe why start a thread that has nothing to do with the music and from the start was a gutter press type of attempt to dig up something that just isn't there

Also if you're now going to present yourself as the victim of bullying and racism you better have some unquestionable proof. Pointing out your mistakes is not bullying!

As for racism, you're probably closer to it than any of the replies to your posts have been.

Yeah, methinks it's time to stop feeding the troll now. Buffet is over.

For the first time in history, according to The Economist Intelligence unit's Democracy Index, USA is no longer a "full democracy", but rather a "flawed democracy".

http://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2017-01-25/the-economist-group-the-us-is-no-longer-a-full-democracy

^Wow. Fucked up times ahead.

Will look on from front porch with beer in hand. Watch it all go to shit.

There is pretty much a constitutional crisis already in USA. Frightening stuff. From Business Insider:

""Trump already seems to be marginalizing the influence of career officials with extensive federal experience at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the State Department, the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Justice Department.
[---]
Department of Homeland Security staff, the officials said, were only allowed to see the order barring refugees from the US after Trump signed it, and National Security Council lawyers were prevented from evaluating it. The State Department and the DoD were also excluded from the process, NBC reported.""

Trump consulted Rudy Giuliani instead ...

Heh. And this is just the beginning. Unbelievable really.

I don't think it's unbelievable. From the moment he names his first nominees, it was clear that Trump has no problems with corruption (Rex Tillerson), incompetence (Genl. Flynn), nepotism (Jared Kushner) or pay-to-play (Betsy DeVos), and that's not even mentioning Steve Bannon, who is plain evil. He's been pushing conspiracy theories for years, he only speaks the truth one-in-three, and he has a LOOOONG history of teetering on the very edge of serious crime (the Genovese-family maffia-connections in Atlantic City, well-publicized since the early '90s). He's been dropping not-so-subtle hints to white supremacists and other extreme right fringe elements that he's with them, and he's already accused the intelligence services, bullwarks of the hard right since their inception, of being part of a liberal conspiracy against the 'real America'.

This is a very serious threat to America and to the world, but it is not very different from what the people who warned that Trump could just be elected said was going to happen. I was not one of them - I did not think he could win, and I still think his win is highly dodgy: James Comey's last-minute unfounded attack on Clinton, the Russian hacks, the masses of fake news (at a literally totalitarian level: as an historian, I've seen these kinds of news before - in WWI propaganda, during the Nazi regime, in Soviet Russia, under Mao, under Pinochet, in South Africa during the '70s and early '80s).

This is an assault on democracy by abusing democratic means. And it's going to get much, much worse before it gets better.

[QUOTE] [b]Oscar J wrote:[/b]

For the first time in history, according to The Economist Intelligence unit's Democracy Index, USA is no longer a "full democracy", but rather a "flawed democracy".

http://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2017-01-25/the-economist-group-the-us-is-no-longer-a-full-democracy

[/QUOTE]

...not even in the top 20, with the powerhouses Uruguay, Mauritius, and Malta beating them out.

And it clarifies that this is almost entirely not due to Trump, as the US has had plenty of flaws even before he stepped into the picture.

I'm not the least bit surprised. For years I've said it - the US is a third world country dressed up as a developed one, and finally academics agree with me.

And believe me, this isn't pride - it's part pity, and part empathy for everyone involved (even if they will be in denial of this when their kids are forced to speak Chinese).

The emperor's clothes are off. We are witnessing the end of the American empire.

I wouldn't include Malta in that comparison, simply because it's no surprise that Malta is a strong democracy. It's been an EU member state for 13 years, has a history of British-influenced political tradition, and has for most of its history been a country with a strong and liberal Western European culture.

[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]

We are witnessing the end of the American empire.
[/QUOTE]

I sincerely hope you are wrong. I cannot think of a single instance in history where a major power, 'empire' if you wish, came to be replaced by another (set of) power(s) without major armed conflict resulting.