Dude, you do not know how to drop something do you?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I'm going to get the person who started this topic a hornet's nest for Christmas.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Yogurt<br><font size=1>The Artist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dude, you do not know how to drop something do you?
[/QUOTE]
Excuse me? It's a forum-topic. The usual approach to a topic on a forum is to DISCUSS it. If you feel threatened because deep down you know I have a point but are afraid to admit it, that's your problem, not mine.
[/QUOTE]
Excuse me? It's a forum-topic. The usual approach to a topic on a forum is to DISCUSS it. If you feel threatened because deep down you know I have a point but are afraid to admit it, that's your problem, not mine.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">Thomas Quinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Yogurt<br><font size=1>The Artist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">Thomas Quinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]He could.
However, there's no such person as Jesus. You'll be interested to hear that there were supposedly a great many people who did what Jesus did, made the same claim he did, etc.
Apollonius and Simon Magus are just two of the more well-known candidates.
So, in other words: Jesus is a combination of several people's acts and ideas, combined by a group of dissident Jews we now know as the Apostles.[/QUOTE]
HAHAHA!
What a bunch of balogna.[/QUOTE]
Fine. Believe what you wish, and ignore fact. That's what marks the narrow-minded religious nut from the sensible person.[/QUOTE]
You sure seem to show a lot of sensibility and open mindness, don't you Caspar?
In the same way that there are religious nuts, there are plenty of anti-religious nuts like yourself. This wouldn't be the first time that you come up with a false argument to back your opinions, and people like Zeni have long proven this.
What sickens me of both sides (relious and non-religious) is that none of them want to admit that there's no proof of whether what's written in the Bible, the Quaran, the Torah or any other sort of sacred religous text is true or not true.
I for once admire any person (religious or not) that respects and appreciates the value of human life and everything else put on this earth. If religion helps people become better human beings, I applaud that, and if the opossite happens then they deserve to be harshly criticized.
Each one of us is entitled to believe what they want to believe regarding our origins, or whether there's a God or not. It's all a matter of respect.
However, there's no such person as Jesus. You'll be interested to hear that there were supposedly a great many people who did what Jesus did, made the same claim he did, etc.
Apollonius and Simon Magus are just two of the more well-known candidates.
So, in other words: Jesus is a combination of several people's acts and ideas, combined by a group of dissident Jews we now know as the Apostles.[/QUOTE]
HAHAHA!
What a bunch of balogna.[/QUOTE]
Fine. Believe what you wish, and ignore fact. That's what marks the narrow-minded religious nut from the sensible person.[/QUOTE]
You sure seem to show a lot of sensibility and open mindness, don't you Caspar?
In the same way that there are religious nuts, there are plenty of anti-religious nuts like yourself. This wouldn't be the first time that you come up with a false argument to back your opinions, and people like Zeni have long proven this.
What sickens me of both sides (relious and non-religious) is that none of them want to admit that there's no proof of whether what's written in the Bible, the Quaran, the Torah or any other sort of sacred religous text is true or not true.
I for once admire any person (religious or not) that respects and appreciates the value of human life and everything else put on this earth. If religion helps people become better human beings, I applaud that, and if the opossite happens then they deserve to be harshly criticized.
Each one of us is entitled to believe what they want to believe regarding our origins, or whether there's a God or not. It's all a matter of respect.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dan Corson wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm going to get the person who started this topic a hornet's nest for Christmas.[/QUOTE]
Fuck you
Fuck you
False evidence?
Do you actually have anything to back that up, or is this yet another one of your empty accusations, which are supposed to prove how liberal and open-minded you are?
Do you actually have anything to back that up, or is this yet another one of your empty accusations, which are supposed to prove how liberal and open-minded you are?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]greaserkat wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dan Corson wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm going to get the person who started this topic a hornet's nest for Christmas.[/QUOTE]
Fuck you[/QUOTE]
Whoa....
slowly leaving this thread alone
Fuck you[/QUOTE]
Whoa....
slowly leaving this thread alone
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<B>Jellybean Queen<h6>sweetbodykisses<B> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]greaserkat wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dan Corson wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm going to get the person who started this topic a hornet's nest for Christmas.[/QUOTE]
Fuck you[/QUOTE]
Whoa....
slowly leaving this thread alone[/QUOTE]
What?
Fuck you[/QUOTE]
Whoa....
slowly leaving this thread alone[/QUOTE]
What?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]greaserkat wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<B>Jellybean Queen<h6>sweetbodykisses<B> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]greaserkat wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dan Corson wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm going to get the person who started this topic a hornet's nest for Christmas.[/QUOTE]
Fuck you[/QUOTE]
Whoa....
slowly leaving this thread alone[/QUOTE]
What?[/QUOTE]
Joking darling...joking...lol
Fuck you[/QUOTE]
Whoa....
slowly leaving this thread alone[/QUOTE]
What?[/QUOTE]
Joking darling...joking...lol
Jesus is the son of God for christ's sake, he can do what he wants
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Paul McCartney Junior wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Jesus is the son of God for christ's sake, he can do what he wants[/QUOTE]
LOL...
LOL...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<B>Jellybean Queen<h6>sweetbodykisses<B> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Paul McCartney Junior wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Jesus is the son of God for christ's sake, he can do what he wants[/QUOTE]
LOL...[/QUOTE]
I'd bet he'd be pretty good at what he does
LOL...[/QUOTE]
I'd bet he'd be pretty good at what he does
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">Thomas Quinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]False evidence?
Do you actually have anything to back that up, or is this yet another one of your empty accusations, which are supposed to prove how liberal and open-minded you are?[/QUOTE]
No, you're the one who is making the empty acusations.
You can give your point of view and show it as what it is... simple theory. There's not an actual fact to back that up, but I won't deny that there's a possibilty that it might be true.
Do you actually have anything to back that up, or is this yet another one of your empty accusations, which are supposed to prove how liberal and open-minded you are?[/QUOTE]
No, you're the one who is making the empty acusations.
You can give your point of view and show it as what it is... simple theory. There's not an actual fact to back that up, but I won't deny that there's a possibilty that it might be true.
yes, he could have been, even twice. pesher to the wedding at Cana. when Jesus/Yeheshua was called 'Rabbi,' the cultural meaning implies wedding and childbirth.
As for 'the Da Vinci Coma,' Dan Brown's prose is flaccid and impotent and carries the stench of a corpse-- {Angels & Demons} works better, and as far as the movie goes, Indiana Jones' Last Crusade & Monty Python's Search are very much worthier examples of the Grail tradition.
Shakespeare made an eloquent point about Jesus Christ through the play *Julius Caesar*. Let's face it, Leonardo was the real name, da Vinci just means he was from the village of Vinci. So what if it's true? So what? Knowledge is nothing without love.
As for 'the Da Vinci Coma,' Dan Brown's prose is flaccid and impotent and carries the stench of a corpse-- {Angels & Demons} works better, and as far as the movie goes, Indiana Jones' Last Crusade & Monty Python's Search are very much worthier examples of the Grail tradition.
Shakespeare made an eloquent point about Jesus Christ through the play *Julius Caesar*. Let's face it, Leonardo was the real name, da Vinci just means he was from the village of Vinci. So what if it's true? So what? Knowledge is nothing without love.
The fact that there are so many differing opinions on the topic in a QUEEN message board just proves that there is not enough evidence or proof that leans toward any definite conclusion.
Would anyone wish to join me on the S.S. Nobody Cares?
Would anyone wish to join me on the S.S. Nobody Cares?