Gregsynth
Magic Tour didn't have poor vocals. That's the Works Tour! :)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Thistle
Gregsynth wrote: Magic Tour didn't have poor vocals. That's the Works Tour! :)
LOL, I'm sure I stated that between '84/'85 there were some poor vocals. Seriously though, Magic Tour was rife with them???
LOL, I'm sure I stated that between '84/'85 there were some poor vocals. Seriously though, Magic Tour was rife with them???
Gregsynth
It was more of a tongue-and-cheek statement (since the 1984 Works Tour was one of Freddie's worst vocal tours--and I love listening to the bloopers). lol
No but seriously, the Magic Tour's vocals aren't that bad. I'll take Wembley or Zurich over London 1984 and Vienna 1984 ANYDAY!
No but seriously, the Magic Tour's vocals aren't that bad. I'll take Wembley or Zurich over London 1984 and Vienna 1984 ANYDAY!
The Real Wizard
Excellent post, Thistleboy. But unfortunately logic doesn't work on trolls..
emrabt
Made in Heaven very little input from Freddie? He wrote or co-wrote 7 of the 10 tracks!
+=============================
yes, "he" contributed the majority, but his input was little to nothing, we know how two of those tracks sounded before hand, and we know how well they charted.
If i was as one sided as max and amir i'd use the fact that there seemed to be ONE person who turned Heaven for everyone, too much love, i was born to love you and Made in heaven into hits.
==============================
And yet nobody can answer how come they havent done one real good queen song since Noone but you
===========================
First page 3rd post, by me, two words JOHN DEACON, by your logic, as he is the only person missing since then, he would be the reason.
that's about it, i seem to have beaten Amir at his own game, what do i win?
+=============================
yes, "he" contributed the majority, but his input was little to nothing, we know how two of those tracks sounded before hand, and we know how well they charted.
If i was as one sided as max and amir i'd use the fact that there seemed to be ONE person who turned Heaven for everyone, too much love, i was born to love you and Made in heaven into hits.
==============================
And yet nobody can answer how come they havent done one real good queen song since Noone but you
===========================
First page 3rd post, by me, two words JOHN DEACON, by your logic, as he is the only person missing since then, he would be the reason.
that's about it, i seem to have beaten Amir at his own game, what do i win?
Mercuryking
Thistle: Look commercial success has NOTHING to do with talent, just look at music today and you know that its true.
Offcourse freddie has been out of tune and other things when recording for example Bohrap, but thats not the point , that is just part of singing.
Im talking talent wise, freddie compare to the rest of the band cant be compared. If you look at the songwriting on the Barcelona album and compare it to brian and rogers, its simply MUCH more talented writing, noone can deny it.
Emrabt: Yea really you convinced me, ive started to think that it was John deacon that was guiding Freddie how to sing and how to make songs....
My point is this: If you truly are a real musician, you should NOT have to resort to collaborating with these crap socalled artist just cause you want to stay relevant in the music industry, you should be making your own new songs and even sing them yourself if you can sing, if not then get a singer and start something new. This just proves to me that he apperantly isnt a truuue musician like freddie was or else he wouldnt do stuff like this.
I bet you that if freddie was still alive that he wouldnt do stuff like these two have. He would have created his own songs until he couldnt and then he would have just quit with music. He would not whore himself out to these untalented garbage just to get exposure.
Offcourse freddie has been out of tune and other things when recording for example Bohrap, but thats not the point , that is just part of singing.
Im talking talent wise, freddie compare to the rest of the band cant be compared. If you look at the songwriting on the Barcelona album and compare it to brian and rogers, its simply MUCH more talented writing, noone can deny it.
Emrabt: Yea really you convinced me, ive started to think that it was John deacon that was guiding Freddie how to sing and how to make songs....
My point is this: If you truly are a real musician, you should NOT have to resort to collaborating with these crap socalled artist just cause you want to stay relevant in the music industry, you should be making your own new songs and even sing them yourself if you can sing, if not then get a singer and start something new. This just proves to me that he apperantly isnt a truuue musician like freddie was or else he wouldnt do stuff like this.
I bet you that if freddie was still alive that he wouldnt do stuff like these two have. He would have created his own songs until he couldnt and then he would have just quit with music. He would not whore himself out to these untalented garbage just to get exposure.
john bodega
The fact that "Let's Turn It On" exists, suggests that Freddie wasn't perfect, and that they were just very lucky to have met each other and founded such a brilliant band. Queen really were something special - 4 fantastic musicians with good ideas of how they should sound and look.
Appreciate the band for what it was, folks - because bands like that don't come around every day.
Appreciate the band for what it was, folks - because bands like that don't come around every day.
jpf
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote: Brian to cooperate with that garbage Lady gaga is a disgrace. He is doing whatever he can to stay relevant in the music scene it seems. (even though the music scene is not a real music scene anymore)
They were all a team that helped getting to where they got BUT now its 20 years since Freddie left and really.. that is almost the same amount of time as Queen existed... It seems that without Freddie , Brian and Roger cant really make any nice good songs anymore.
Just saying what most think but wont dare to say. Freddie was in a sense Queen and the rest of the guys was needed to bring everything else that was needed for Freddies talent to shine.
I know they all made number 1 hit songs but i believe that Freddie had HUGE input/inpact in every one of these songs.
Just saying how i see it. How come we dont see anymore of these great songs anymore since Freddie is gone.....? A coincident? I think not.
------
Freddie wasn't Queen. Brian, Roger, John, and Freddie were Queen.
Freddie "left"? No, he died because of foolish, unsafe sexual practices.
BTW, there are a few Queen songs that Freddie had no part in.
They were all a team that helped getting to where they got BUT now its 20 years since Freddie left and really.. that is almost the same amount of time as Queen existed... It seems that without Freddie , Brian and Roger cant really make any nice good songs anymore.
Just saying what most think but wont dare to say. Freddie was in a sense Queen and the rest of the guys was needed to bring everything else that was needed for Freddies talent to shine.
I know they all made number 1 hit songs but i believe that Freddie had HUGE input/inpact in every one of these songs.
Just saying how i see it. How come we dont see anymore of these great songs anymore since Freddie is gone.....? A coincident? I think not.
------
Freddie wasn't Queen. Brian, Roger, John, and Freddie were Queen.
Freddie "left"? No, he died because of foolish, unsafe sexual practices.
BTW, there are a few Queen songs that Freddie had no part in.
jpf
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote: No its the truth in my oppinion, offcourse brian and the rest of the guys were great musicians but they didnt have that "it" thing , that special talent. I couldnt careless what that talentless garbage Gaga thinks, she has no business being in the music industry.
You havent told me how come if they were equally as good as Freddie , that we havent seen any more of those super great songs that came out of Queen since freddie died?
Freddie was 75% of Queen
---
No, it's not the truth, it's only your opinion.
Freddie was 25% of Queen.
End of story.
You havent told me how come if they were equally as good as Freddie , that we havent seen any more of those super great songs that came out of Queen since freddie died?
Freddie was 75% of Queen
---
No, it's not the truth, it's only your opinion.
Freddie was 25% of Queen.
End of story.
jpf
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote: YannickJoker wrote: I think it's fair to say Freddie was largely responsible for their success, but that's as far as it goes. Freddie was 1/4 Queen, just like the other three.
============
emrabt wrote:
Both Made In Heaven (the album) and no one but you have very little to no input from Freddie, but both are still very much Queen
============
Made in Heaven very little input from Freddie? He wrote or co-wrote 7 of the 10 tracks! He may have had no input in the way the album was edited and which songs were put on, but he had a lot of input in the material itself. Not trying to say anything with that, just pointing it out. ===============================================================================
YannickJoker: Apperently it does not matter even if he wrote 150 of 200 songs, he still is only 25% of Queen cause you cant ever be better than the other person. It just isnt possible, when you form a band everyone becomes just equal no matter if one is super good and the other mediocre.
That is the reasoning of Queenzone and others. Just cause you are in a band doesnt mean they are all equally good and they werent either, Freddie was the true talent. As said before , Freddie is light years ahead of EVERYONE.
-----
Steve Perry, in his prime, outsang Freddie. Freddie wasn't the best vocalist out there. He wasn't even the vocalist in Queen who sang the highest notes.
============
emrabt wrote:
Both Made In Heaven (the album) and no one but you have very little to no input from Freddie, but both are still very much Queen
============
Made in Heaven very little input from Freddie? He wrote or co-wrote 7 of the 10 tracks! He may have had no input in the way the album was edited and which songs were put on, but he had a lot of input in the material itself. Not trying to say anything with that, just pointing it out. ===============================================================================
YannickJoker: Apperently it does not matter even if he wrote 150 of 200 songs, he still is only 25% of Queen cause you cant ever be better than the other person. It just isnt possible, when you form a band everyone becomes just equal no matter if one is super good and the other mediocre.
That is the reasoning of Queenzone and others. Just cause you are in a band doesnt mean they are all equally good and they werent either, Freddie was the true talent. As said before , Freddie is light years ahead of EVERYONE.
-----
Steve Perry, in his prime, outsang Freddie. Freddie wasn't the best vocalist out there. He wasn't even the vocalist in Queen who sang the highest notes.
Mercuryking
Lets turn it on isnt bad, its actually good for that sort of style.
Its really simple , if Freddie isnt somehow involved with the quality control and guides them how the songs should go , then their songs would have not been all that great. Freddie had an ear for quality which apperently these two LACK big time since watchin what they have done and who they have been collabing with.
Its really simple , if Freddie isnt somehow involved with the quality control and guides them how the songs should go , then their songs would have not been all that great. Freddie had an ear for quality which apperently these two LACK big time since watchin what they have done and who they have been collabing with.
jpf
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote: yea you are right im not a musician , i dont know what i was thinking.
Ohh is that so mr fortune teller? So freddie would have not made it alone huh? Ok explain one thing then, BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY. That would have been freddies solo song with other musicians , are you still going to say that he would not have made it with that song?
Get real.
----
"Bohemian Rhapsody" would have been an entirely different song without Brian and Roger.
Ohh is that so mr fortune teller? So freddie would have not made it alone huh? Ok explain one thing then, BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY. That would have been freddies solo song with other musicians , are you still going to say that he would not have made it with that song?
Get real.
----
"Bohemian Rhapsody" would have been an entirely different song without Brian and Roger.
Mercuryking
JPF: Excuse me but there is noone that can outsing Mercury doesnt matter if he could sing 10 octaves of range, you still suck compared to him. He was pure energi with a super voice that was so in tune that it sometimes sounds even better than brians guitar tone. He was music basically.
jpf
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote: JPF: Excuse me but there is noone that can outsing Mercury doesnt matter if he could sing 10 octaves of range, you still suck compared to him. He was pure energi with a super voice that was so in tune that it sometimes sounds even better than brians guitar tone. He was music basically.
-----
Steve Perry outsang Freddie Mercury.
Deal with it.
-----
Steve Perry outsang Freddie Mercury.
Deal with it.
plumrach
Maybe im in a minority here but i quite like Freddie's solo stuff, he wasnt doing it to have a massively successful solo career but as he said himself it was just a little project that he wanted to work on