Queen crest Queenzone

Let Me In Your Heart Again - William Orbit mix

189 posts Page 10 of 13
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Vocal Harmony & Inu-liger dont call me a liar please.
Brenski has just stated above he thinks "Ray of Light" is better than anything Queen has had out since 1982 onwards,
so he is sllagging off:
Hot Space
The Works
A kind of Magic
Live Magic,
The Miracle
Innuendo
Made in Heaven

Still think Brenski is king on here then and a true Queen supporter?
"Time is but a paper moon"
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]

Vocal Harmony & Inu-liger dont call me a liar please.
Brenski has just stated above he thinks "Ray of Light" is better than anything Queen has had out since 1982 onwards,
so he is sllagging off:
Hot Space
The Works
A kind of Magic
Live Magic,
The Miracle
Innuendo
Made in Heaven


Still think Brenski is king on here then and a trueQueen supporter?[/QUOTE]

Yes I do think he is a "true Queen supporter" and more so than you. Brenski is open to other people work, and the fact that there are artists who produced better work than Queen. Particularly when compared to some of their 80's output.

In the real world it is possible to like more than o e thing, and realise it is good or even better than something else.

Your attitude towards anything that has a Freddie vocal on it is that it is beyond reproach. No one has the freedom to have an alternate view, which is what drives art ( music in this case ) forward.

Believe what you will, but don't try to pull people down to your level of thinking because their views are not shared by you.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]Vocal Harmony & Inu-liger  dont call me a liar please.
Brenski has just stated above he thinks "Ray of Light" is better than anything Queen has had out since 1982 onwards,so he is sllagging off:
 Hot Space The Works A kind of Magic Live Magic,
The Miracle Innuendo Made in Heaven
[/QUOTE]
that ^^^ is NOT what i said - you really need to learn to read and understand what you are reading - nothing in this says the whole album is better than ALL of queen's post 82 output....this is what i actually said, you f**king moron:
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]Orbit's genius touch worked well with Madonna's (at that time) reinvention as "earth mother"...there are some killer tracks on that album that are as good and better than most of queen's output from 82 to date:[/QUOTE]

[i][b]you see that Telmatosaurus? dredging around in filthy muddy swamps, with it's stumpy swinging tail and lumbering body lurching from crap to mud, not ever having a sensible thought in it's pea-sized brain? - that's YOU that is.[/b][/i]
apologies to Newman & Baddiel's "History Today"
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
· Member since
Brenski : you have still said that the tracks on "Ray of Light" are better than ALL of Queens post 82 output.
so read what you have wrote down you fucking four eyed wanker.
"Time is but a paper moon"
· Member since
Is there a Freddie Mercury forum around? cause it should be a bigger distinction between Queen fans and FM fans.
I'm bored with all this "Freddie god" childish stuff.
Queen is more important then FM.
Fuckers
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b] i never said i liked the "ray of light" album i said it had fair tracks on it. what lie are you referring to then?[/QUOTE] THIS lie: [QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b] Didnt say i like "Ray of light" i said it had some fair tracks on the album. It was Brenski and inu-liger that stated it was a brilliant album so have a go at those 2 pricks.[/QUOTE] Once again, retract this lie and apologize. I do NOT appreciate having invented lies put into my mouth. I will ask you once again, how can I like an album I have never heard in full, aside from a few singles by themselves? You're full of shit.
· Member since
gerry is a shitfuck.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]

Brenski : you have still said that the tracks on "Ray of Light" are better than ALL of Queens post 82 output.
so read what you have wrote down you fucking four eyed wanker.[/QUOTE]

You literally never get anything right. It's incredible.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote:[/b]Vocal Harmony & Inu-liger dont call me a liar please.
Brenski has just stated above he thinks [i][b]"Ray of Light"[/b][/i] is[b][i] better than anything Queen has had out since 1982 onwards,[/i][/b][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE] [b]gerry wrote: [/b] Brenski : you have still said that [b][i]the tracks on[/i][/b] "Ray of Light" are better than [b][i]ALL[/i][/b] of Queens post 82 output.
so read what you have wrote down you fucking four eyed wanker.[/QUOTE]

you're a fucking relentless dolt aren't you?

for the last fucking time you clown:  I said:
...there are [b][i]some killer tracks[/i][/b] on that album that are [b][i]as good[/i][/b] and [b][i]better[/i][/b] than [b][i]most [/i][/b]of queen's output from 82 to date:
Just to reiterate - that[b][i] ^^^[/i][/b] is [b][i]NOTHING like[/i][/b] what you are saying i've said - here's my EXACT quote:
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]Orbit's genius touch worked well with Madonna's (at that time) reinvention as "earth mother"...there aresome killer tracks on that album that are as good and better than most of queen's output from 82 to date[/QUOTE]  

.... and [i][b]YOU've actually changed[/b][/i] what you've said. you're a fucking simpleton to think people can't read and understand the difference between [b][i]your TWO statements[/i][/b] above - unless YOU'RE [i][b]just so thick[/b] [/i]that YOU don't realise [b][i]YOU'VE said two VERY different things[/i][/b]? - yeah that's more plausible...pity you can't delete my quoting your quoted lol.

so for once in your fucking life - admit you have got it wrong, you have misquoted me. so no caveats, no qualifying your stupid statements - just admit you got it wrong. - or are YOU not MAN enough to admit you are wrong?
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
· Member since
That's FOUR people in a row now calling you out on your lies and BS tactics, Gerry. You're outnumbered, you may as well come clean right now and admit for once YOU WERE WRONG.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]cmsdrums wrote:[/b]

I've asked Rhys a question about previously unknown live gig footage and audio, such as Brussels 84, on Twitter. I'll post here if I get a response.[/QUOTE]

Nice! Thanks for that
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]

That's FOUR people in a row now calling you out on your lies and BS tactics, Gerry. You're outnumbered, you may as well come clean right now and admit for once YOU WERE WRONG.[/QUOTE]

Yeah Gerry admit it!
Gerry is an douche
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]tomchristie22 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]cmsdrums wrote:[/b]
I've asked Rhys a question about previously unknown live gig footage and audio, such as Brussels 84, on Twitter. I'll post here if I get a response.[/QUOTE]
Nice! Thanks for that[/QUOTE]

I hope he'll respond.
· Member since
This is one of the things that separates Queen message boards from others...

Usually arguments tend to stay personal and be forgotten when there isn't a direct response from the other side, but for some reason on Queen message boards the crowd of other posters jump on the bandwagon and keep the argument going.

My theory is that this is due to the frustration created by the QP release policy over the past 20 years.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]tero! 48531 wrote:[/b]
My theory is that this is due to the frustration created by the QP release policy over the past 20 years.[/QUOTE]

That's only part of the equation, my friend.