Brian on Setlist Q+AL 2017

Sniff-fuck pretends to know things about QUeen and is uttlerly clueless. She treis to manipulate pple by stating facts that are simly not true. Her asswhipe idol deserves every flack he gets. He is a nothing and will always be a nothing. Selling Freddie as unstable alcohilc on stage is pure nonsense and you know it. He was one of the most preofessional showmen ever

I haven't said anything about Freddie and I fail to see why Adam deserves flack because of something a fans says about him - that's no more his fault than it is Freddie's when people say stuff about him.

I did not mean you but pathetic sniff-toss who is spreading her lies. See page 5. Disgusting person she is

Lamebert does not deserve the flack becuase of his fan's remarks but because of his tired QAL act. But the Glamberts rival him when it comes to embarrassment

You better quit calling me names, runner. I am not sure what I am spreading lies about??? Freddie did mess up things if he wasn't quite himself. Many Queen fans have said the tours were pretty much the same night after night. Maybe those folks are wrong, but I have read that often enough. I have also said Freddie is an icon who will always be amazing. QAL is not Freddie, but it may be the best if you can't see Freddie, which you can't. I am not sure where lying comes into this. I also said I don't post on the Queen threads since I don't know enough about the history of Queen and you people are ugly enough here, so I would never dream of posting there. Are my remarks getting under your skin? You pretty much say whatever the heck you want and in the vilest of terms. The drivel you spout is definitely not true so I am not sure what your problem is, other than being a totally nasty individual!

I didn't sell him as an unstable alcoholic. I would say your English needs a bit of work.

Show me one proof of a Freddie wo "was not himself" on stage you pathetic GLamfart loser

[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]

Show me one proof of a Freddie wo "was not himself" on stage you pathetic GLamfart loser[/QUOTE]

There you go again with your pathetically childish insults. . .

The answer to your question is New Zealand 85, 13th April I think it was. . .

You're equally pathetic, claiming to be a genuine Queen fan but asking stupid questions which you really didn't want the answer too.

I told you that i know that it was thid ONE Show. Snifftart said it was the rule. When do these fucking clueless glamfarts leave the board. This sad drivel is more than enough

[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]

Snifflese you're a fucking moron and I mean pages it. TO say that Queen's vintage shows were only unscripted when Freddie was "wasted" is really a fucked up remark. Freddie was ONE time a lil wasted that was in Aussieland in 1985 but you talk about him as if you could be lucky when he was sober on stage. That happended according to who ??????What a sad remark you fucking prick. Fuck off to you lame Lamebird sites and praise that fucking asswipe. To say the shows are now what they were back then is another stupid bullshit: As far as I remember they had a guy on the mic that could sing and no retarded wanker looking like the Joker from a Batman B-movie. Now shut the fuck up and vanish from here you sad bitch.[/QUOTE]

It was New Zealand not "Aussieland. And you obviously weren't at Leeds in 1982, Freddie was pissed on stage there too but somehow got away with it. . .

Yeah we get it now. He was pissed all the time. Never hit the high notes and was a lousy frontman. Lametart is superior. He is the best.

Not....

Pathetic glamtarts. Rethink because of whom your dad parrott has a career

runner_70 where or when have I said Freddie was pissed all the time?

Where have I said he couldn't hit high notes? Although anyone with half a musical ear will know that very often he chose not too live. Preservation of damaged vocal chords was a sensible route to take.

Where have I said Freddie was a lousy front man?

If you need to invent shit to justify your degrading comments or views you're on to a loser. If you can't accept the wider view away from your tunnel vision of Lambert hate that's your problem, no one else's. And if you're going to ask stupid questions then you better be ready for some answers that are not going to fit your preconceived ideas

Yeah we get it now. He was pissed all the time. Never hit the high notes and was a lousy frontman. Lametart is superior. He is the best.

Not....

Pathetic glamtarts. Rethink because of whom your dad parrott has a career



=============================================


Lambert or Lamturd can't be compared to Freddie.. Yes he is a entertainer ( for the theater), has an amazing voice, is gay and likes to show that on stage aswell by pretending his mic is a c**k etc. Just great... ahum...


Freddie wrote, composed, designed and was involved in the clothes Queen wore, the stagedesign, the lights and above he was very very musically. For me a far more versatile entertainer. Freddie really had audience in the palm of his hand every night and each Queen performance was slightly different and magic.

Nowadays there isn't much left of this. What you look at is basicly the same greatest hits setlist for 5 years in a row, an overproduced show with the same songs, riffs and jokes ( Frank likes to give head and without the two Queen royals I would not be here) EACH NIGHT.

I glad Roger and Brian can play the Queen music and wish everyone a great time at their upcoming shows.