I confess I have only listened to Dog with A Bone once, and even then I wasn`t paying much attention, so no idea :)
Thanks,
Maybe someone else knows anything about this?
Maybe mr Scully or JSS.
I confess I have only listened to Dog with A Bone once, and even then I wasn`t paying much attention, so no idea :)
What I was wondering is if Dog with a bone would also be a song that already was created during these sessions, and didn't get finished so it was later on rerecorded for the fanclubmembers?
The reason I'm asking this is because it shows ressemblance with Hangman, and also soundwise it could be from the same era, because the song itself is very basic and raw, so a bit typical for their early period.
PS: I have already answered this post. It is on page 5 of this thread.
PPS: Why the obsession with "Dog With A Bone" and "Hangman"?
There's a dvd project that I'm working on right now for my theatre group which involves bringing together their personal photos, singing on some tracks from this show and also lots of personal video footage donated to the project. Four of those videos were purchased for themselves and they have handed them to me for free!
Now, the next part is hard to believe. I'm repackaging all this stuff together and then selling it back to them. Two points there, one, they're paying for something they already owned and 2, the good part is that it will be improved, e.g. sound remixed and video cleaned (where possible).
Looking at that makes me sound like the bad guy, yes? But the part you don't see is my heart and soul being poured into it. The fact that I didn't have to do this and have taken my own personal time to make and distribute this product to the theatre.
Does it sound familiar? Brian is always talking the same about his projects. The love of it and the excitement at improving and exceeding expectations with technology, etc. etc.
But what's wrong with that? The only thing I can come up with is that it's not always what the fans want to see.
Peace,
Adam.
There's a dvd project that I'm working on right now for my theatre group which involves bringing together their personal photos, singing on some tracks from this show and also lots of personal video footage donated to the project. Four of those videos were purchased for themselves and they have handed them to me for free!
Now, the next part is hard to believe. I'm repackaging all this stuff together and then selling it back to them. Two points there, one, they're paying for something they already owned and 2, the good part is that it will be improved, e.g. sound remixed and video cleaned (where possible).
Looking at that makes me sound like the bad guy, yes? But the part you don't see is my heart and soul being poured into it. The fact that I didn't have to do this and have taken my own personal time to make and distribute this product to the theatre.
Does it sound familiar? Brian is always talking the same about his projects. The love of it and the excitement at improving and exceeding expectations with technology, etc. etc.
But what's wrong with that? The only thing I can come up with is that it's not always what the fans want to see.
Peace,
Adam.
I never did get an answer to this because Greg popped in on another thread for a second time and everyone ignored posts in this thread.
I think this is an important point that I've made above. Because the basic idea is something we have all heard from QP. And it seems that it's something that is not liked.
Peace,
Adam.