Invisible Woman,I get your point I really do but in my opinion Queen corporate has pushed Mary bisexual point so much I do think it was smart of Thor to point out their time with them led to no wham bam thank you man with the ladies or where I come from if the trailers rock”n don’t come Knock”n saying it means he is getting
It on with a lady which I guess he wasn’t friends proved that. We have at least prove now . We are fans they were his friends they had the same interests as him and that’s men. Which I think is no big deal but I guess it was then and to corporate maybe it is now.The music he made was his talent that was their job they should’ve stayed out of his buisness. I think to some degree he already knew being Gay would effect his career and they didn’t make it any easier. They say here you need to appear with a woman fine okay maybe Freddie himself gave this thought and said this is best. Could it have not been someone other than Mary why keep that story line going I don’t think that helped things at all. Bisexual my ass.I just don’t think he was at all.m
Thread
Posts in chronological order
By the way nothing wrong with being bisexual I am and let me tell you it’s not a easy life. I would have rather been straight or Gay anyday.You are so judged as a bisexual man and woman. It’s terrible you learn to say fuck everybody your not putting me in any box of labels and you rum like hell.Im glad Freddie knew he was Gay and anyone else that knows they are. It tickled my heart the first time I was on QZ I had seen Thor’s post and he had introduced himself and I thought what a unusual but cool name but what caught my attention was the fact he said I’m a Gay man from Newyork that warmed my heart. How glorious that is to be able to not care what people think of you and be sure of yourself.
By the way don’t let anyone detour you from stating your point even if you don’t agree with me Invisable Woman you have as much right to state your opinion as anyone else. I do think you have had some good points about Freddie’s need for those abusive relations and you have made many valid points.
I promise not to let anyone detour me from stating my points. I'm agree that I have as much right to express my points as anyone else.
The difference between Invosible Woman and I is that she goes along with the party line, so she doesn't normally have anyone contesting her even when there’s so much evidence to the contrary of what she says.
SHE Is the one who bullies others for having an anomalou, or divergent opinion.
As Freddie said;
”I’m not afraid to speak out and say the things that I want to or do the things I want to do. So I think in the end being natural and being actually genuine is what wins” - Freddie
Freddie didn't have a ”need” for abusive relationships. NEED implies want. What Freddie had was a pathology that led him to seek out and accept abuse from partners like Jim Hutton and others.
The difference between Invosible Woman and I is that she goes along with the party line, so she doesn't normally have anyone contesting her even when there’s so much evidence to the contrary of what she says.
SHE Is the one who bullies others for having an anomalou, or divergent opinion.
As Freddie said;
”I’m not afraid to speak out and say the things that I want to or do the things I want to do. So I think in the end being natural and being actually genuine is what wins” - Freddie
Freddie didn't have a ”need” for abusive relationships. NEED implies want. What Freddie had was a pathology that led him to seek out and accept abuse from partners like Jim Hutton and others.
I promise not to let anyone detour me from stating my points. I'm agree that I have as much right to express my points as anyone else.
The difference between Invosible Woman and I is that she goes along with the party line, so she doesn't normally have anyone contesting her even when there’s so much evidence to the contrary of what she says.
SHE Is the one who bullies others for having an anomalou, or divergent opinion.
As Freddie said;
”I’m not afraid to speak out and say the things that I want to or do the things I want to do. So I think in the end being natural and being actually genuine is what wins” - Freddie
Freddie didn't have a ”need” for abusive relationships. NEED implies want. What Freddie had was a pathology that led him to seek out and accept abuse from partners like Jim Hutton and others.
The difference between Invosible Woman and I is that she goes along with the party line, so she doesn't normally have anyone contesting her even when there’s so much evidence to the contrary of what she says.
SHE Is the one who bullies others for having an anomalou, or divergent opinion.
As Freddie said;
”I’m not afraid to speak out and say the things that I want to or do the things I want to do. So I think in the end being natural and being actually genuine is what wins” - Freddie
Freddie didn't have a ”need” for abusive relationships. NEED implies want. What Freddie had was a pathology that led him to seek out and accept abuse from partners like Jim Hutton and others.
Freddie got off on fighting it got him ready to perform on stage . The End .
CHEVYMAN wrote:
Freddie got off on fighting it got him ready to perform on stage . The End .
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
First of all, that’s just Phoebe’s stupid interpretation.
He thinks of Freddie as God, he doesn't see him as human so it never occurred to him that Freddie didn't fight before shows because it ”got him off”, he got in fights because of the nervous energy most performers feel when gearing up for a show.
I'm always thought it was an assholish thing for Phoebe to claim Freddie ”got off” on fighting, when the more logical explanation nervous energy,
As if Freddie NEEDED to hype himself before a show. Give me a break. LOLOLOL
CHEVYMAN wrote:
Freddie got off on fighting it got him ready to perform on stage . The End .
Secondly it's HUGELY offensive to infer that somehow someone LIKES to be abused and is somehow at fault or it’s what they want.