[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]MS wrote: [/QUOTENAME]http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/profile.aspx?q=918
We can all ask her of course whether YSM is telling the truth. You see its that easy ;)[/QUOTE]
Dude this is tha last time i will bloody say this! I AM NOT YSM OR ANY OTHER FUCKER YOU THINK I AM!! SO SHUT THE HELL UP ALREADY! I haven't had any other problems with anyone else, so why start on me? Get over it! Go ahead and ask Diane, i have known her and her husband for 12 or more years, so like i care what you ask her.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
You certainly have made a very valid point with your last post, Greg. On the other hand, you have not always behaved in 'orthodox' ways (to say the least) within this forum. I guess we all just will have to take QUEENZone mostly as a "live and let die" scene: cherishing the good moments - by-passing the rest. Don't you agree?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]MS wrote: [/QUOTENAME]http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/profile.aspx?q=918
We can all ask her of course whether YSM is telling the truth. You see its that easy ;)[/QUOTE]
Dude this is tha last time i will bloody say this! I AM NOT YSM OR ANY OTHER FUCKER YOU THINK I AM!! SO SHUT THE HELL UP ALREADY! I haven't had any other problems with anyone else, so why start on me? Get over it! Go ahead and ask Diane, i have known her and her husband for 12 or more years, so like i care what you ask her.[/QUOTE]
Chill out dude. So if you know her for 12 years, why you never had time to ask for a copy of Hamburg 74?
YSM = JFarnham = YSWoman = Moanzone Twat = Queen Mum Archivist = Crezchi
khmm... personality problems?
We can all ask her of course whether YSM is telling the truth. You see its that easy ;)[/QUOTE]
Dude this is tha last time i will bloody say this! I AM NOT YSM OR ANY OTHER FUCKER YOU THINK I AM!! SO SHUT THE HELL UP ALREADY! I haven't had any other problems with anyone else, so why start on me? Get over it! Go ahead and ask Diane, i have known her and her husband for 12 or more years, so like i care what you ask her.[/QUOTE]
Chill out dude. So if you know her for 12 years, why you never had time to ask for a copy of Hamburg 74?
YSM = JFarnham = YSWoman = Moanzone Twat = Queen Mum Archivist = Crezchi
khmm... personality problems?
Now you are just being plain stupid! lol hahahaha, get over yourself, honestly. lol
Ask Barb to trace the IP address of these users "YSWoman = Moanzone Twat = Queen Mum Archivist" Then she can tell you that NONE of these people are me at all!
The individual IP's HAVE been checked!
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]« Jay » wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What I don't understand is why every interesting thread turns into a huge discussion or even a fight when it reaches two pages or more. Seriously what is up with that? We should be working together and share information. Not endlessly argue with each other. Call me naive if you must but this place would be a lot more fun if everybody would accept and respect each other for who they are and left their personal issues behind them.[/QUOTE]
*******
Jay... there are MANY people here on MoanZone, and FEW and an ever dwindling number of genuine people, who really care about getting at serious Queen and related issues.
Sadly, you will always find that decent honest and reasonable questions and threads get sabotaged or hijacked by a series of morons intent upon spoiling it for everyone. That is the nature of these kinds of forum sites. It cannot be avoided. You have young idiots, utter morons and spanners (as we call them here) that have nothing constructive to contribute, no knowledge or experience, and can only offer something stupid, untrelated, insulting, banaal, predictable. There are MANY of them, and they even piss off other QZ-ers. But STILL they are here!!!!!
STILL THEY ARE TOLERATED. GOD ONLY KNOWS WHY.
You will soon see comments added to this point of mine, now, that will endorse the point. Some of them seem to be 9 or 10 years old. Is that feasible? I guess it must be. And even those in their late teens and 20s seem as mad as march hares. Some are the kind of people you would serious avoid if you saw them on the street. Believe me, I know what I'm talking about on this issue. Some are genuinely 'dangerous' individuals with what's going on inside their heads. You can determine this easily enough by some threads on this site, as you know.
This is the nature of these sites. I'm aware of that. That's why most people who want serious debate and whom want to get at the real essence of interesting Queen issues, do so in private email without the risk of dickheads interrupting and getting in the way just because they can. Sad, isn't it.
There is some great stuff here on QZ, which I read, and sometimes follow up on, or which I direct certain people within the Queen circle towards. BUT it is littered with so much pollution and unrelated trash and stupidity from people who know nothing, that most of the main people I direct to things, get bored very quickly and leave. Is this what you want?
I think it would be great if there was some efficient and ruthless way of filtering away those who seek only to sabotage, hijact, corrupt and generally fuck up what could otherwise be a forum/site with an unusual and enviable reputation. This is, as far as I can see, the main reason that a lot of key people avoid this site.
It COULD be very different. At the moment QZ's reputation is far from enviable. Of course there will be those to disagree with this, but those people would argue with ANYTHING at all, just for the sake of it. But you know what I mean.
If QueenZone were a high street shop, many of the people who come in and abuse it, who try to pollute and break it, would surely be thrown out - some with a good and well-earned smack round the ear as they were ejected. But here on QZ, ANY nasty sod can say what he/she likes - to disrupt good conversation and block proper progress, to the huge detriment of it all. It's so tedious and, I think, unnecessary.
There seems to be NO policing, no care, no monitoring of this sight. Imagine if you tried to run a shop or office company that way!
Why can't there be some sensible filtering of those who use and abuse this site? Ok, I might get thrown off too, as too might the mean and moody Poppy (who said she made a 13-years old QZ-er cry and bugger off), but that might not be a bad thing.
I for one would certainly sacrifice myself and my extremely amusing and e
*******
Jay... there are MANY people here on MoanZone, and FEW and an ever dwindling number of genuine people, who really care about getting at serious Queen and related issues.
Sadly, you will always find that decent honest and reasonable questions and threads get sabotaged or hijacked by a series of morons intent upon spoiling it for everyone. That is the nature of these kinds of forum sites. It cannot be avoided. You have young idiots, utter morons and spanners (as we call them here) that have nothing constructive to contribute, no knowledge or experience, and can only offer something stupid, untrelated, insulting, banaal, predictable. There are MANY of them, and they even piss off other QZ-ers. But STILL they are here!!!!!
STILL THEY ARE TOLERATED. GOD ONLY KNOWS WHY.
You will soon see comments added to this point of mine, now, that will endorse the point. Some of them seem to be 9 or 10 years old. Is that feasible? I guess it must be. And even those in their late teens and 20s seem as mad as march hares. Some are the kind of people you would serious avoid if you saw them on the street. Believe me, I know what I'm talking about on this issue. Some are genuinely 'dangerous' individuals with what's going on inside their heads. You can determine this easily enough by some threads on this site, as you know.
This is the nature of these sites. I'm aware of that. That's why most people who want serious debate and whom want to get at the real essence of interesting Queen issues, do so in private email without the risk of dickheads interrupting and getting in the way just because they can. Sad, isn't it.
There is some great stuff here on QZ, which I read, and sometimes follow up on, or which I direct certain people within the Queen circle towards. BUT it is littered with so much pollution and unrelated trash and stupidity from people who know nothing, that most of the main people I direct to things, get bored very quickly and leave. Is this what you want?
I think it would be great if there was some efficient and ruthless way of filtering away those who seek only to sabotage, hijact, corrupt and generally fuck up what could otherwise be a forum/site with an unusual and enviable reputation. This is, as far as I can see, the main reason that a lot of key people avoid this site.
It COULD be very different. At the moment QZ's reputation is far from enviable. Of course there will be those to disagree with this, but those people would argue with ANYTHING at all, just for the sake of it. But you know what I mean.
If QueenZone were a high street shop, many of the people who come in and abuse it, who try to pollute and break it, would surely be thrown out - some with a good and well-earned smack round the ear as they were ejected. But here on QZ, ANY nasty sod can say what he/she likes - to disrupt good conversation and block proper progress, to the huge detriment of it all. It's so tedious and, I think, unnecessary.
There seems to be NO policing, no care, no monitoring of this sight. Imagine if you tried to run a shop or office company that way!
Why can't there be some sensible filtering of those who use and abuse this site? Ok, I might get thrown off too, as too might the mean and moody Poppy (who said she made a 13-years old QZ-er cry and bugger off), but that might not be a bad thing.
I for one would certainly sacrifice myself and my extremely amusing and e
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The individual IP's HAVE been checked!
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar!
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The individual IP's HAVE been checked!
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
Yes but you ARE YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, and Queen mum archivist.
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
Yes but you ARE YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, and Queen mum archivist.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color="green">The Fairy King wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The individual IP's HAVE been checked!
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
Yes but you ARE YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, and Queen mum archivist.[/QUOTE]
Based on what evidence???? It is not possible for me to go to a different state or country and post comments, get real, Barb will clear this up. Of course you guys will probably argue with her as well.
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
Yes but you ARE YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, and Queen mum archivist.[/QUOTE]
Based on what evidence???? It is not possible for me to go to a different state or country and post comments, get real, Barb will clear this up. Of course you guys will probably argue with her as well.
Greg seems to want to turn this site into some QPL controlled police state. It'll never happen. AND WE KNOW EVERYONE READS IT no matter what you say Greg. Queen are a business. They have to know what's bubbling.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The individual IP's HAVE been checked!
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
I didn't, did I?
I did not draw any personal conclusions in my remark. I leave that to the readers. I just presented a fact. I'm sure YV will indeed be happy to clear this up as soon as she's back from her trip.
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
I didn't, did I?
I did not draw any personal conclusions in my remark. I leave that to the readers. I just presented a fact. I'm sure YV will indeed be happy to clear this up as soon as she's back from her trip.
I don't see why it is Barb's responsibility to prove who is who. If someone accused me of being someone I wasn't, I wouldn't get worked up over it or get defensive. I could care less if anyone thinks I am not me. I could be the Queen of Sheba or I could just be Lisser. Who cares either way? If you're not YSM, just ignore those who are saying you are. Why do you allow them to waste your time? Just act like they don't exist rather than give them the attention they want from you.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The individual IP's HAVE been checked!
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
I didn't, did I?
I did not draw any personal conclusions in my remark. I leave that to the readers. I just presented a fact. I'm sure YV will indeed be happy to clear this up as soon as she's back from her trip.[/QUOTE]
Sorry dude, but the way you worded your comment, it makes it seem that the IP's were checked and i am these people! But i am NOT. So leave me alone with these lies.
@ Lisser, i understand your meaning, but, i do not even want to be compared to someone such as any of these users in question not alone be claimed to be one or all of them! I am not a troll or some insane psycho.
Just so you know.
There is indeed some schizofrenic behaviour going on in here! :-)[/QUOTE]
Dude, DO NOT even try and say that i am "YoungStratWoman, Moanzone Twat, or Queen mum archivist"! because if you are saying the IP's are the same or from my area, you are a liar![/QUOTE]
I didn't, did I?
I did not draw any personal conclusions in my remark. I leave that to the readers. I just presented a fact. I'm sure YV will indeed be happy to clear this up as soon as she's back from her trip.[/QUOTE]
Sorry dude, but the way you worded your comment, it makes it seem that the IP's were checked and i am these people! But i am NOT. So leave me alone with these lies.
@ Lisser, i understand your meaning, but, i do not even want to be compared to someone such as any of these users in question not alone be claimed to be one or all of them! I am not a troll or some insane psycho.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]My point was that LIKE Stratman owning the footage, the Bo Rhap out-takes DO NOT EXIST.[/QUOTE]
Re: Queen footage.
Apart from the usual bootlegs and Queenzone downloads, I do not know what is out there film-wise - that is not my area of expertise. Certainly, I have no exclusive footage QPL may be interested in.
However, I do know that some fans are so ‘obsessed’ they take upon themselves the mantle of ‘blind-bidder’ (or as our friend Wilki would say, a ‘suicide-bidder’). Simply, sometimes unmarked – or random items come up for sale – but the owner does not know the full extent of what they are selling – and while these sales usually end up as junk – on odd occasions, they have actually turned up trumps. Here are a few examples. (Unfortunately, I am not at liberty to use real names – but most are known on Queenzone).
Mr. Red blindly bought a batch of five EMI master reel tapes. He did not know what was on them. He does not own a reel-to-reel recorder. After paying to have these digitally transferred, I believe one was of David Bowie, the other Elton John. The other three tapes have yet to be converted. Blindly bought – and so far no return.
Mr. Blue blindly bought a 7” Acetate at auction. No information was available, except that it came from Freddie Mercury who passed it onto David Minns, who was behind the sale. Unfortunately, this was not a rare Queen or even solo track, but it did turn out to be a very rare unreleased Freddie produced ‘Trax’ disc, and as we know, all ‘Trax’ material was subsequently erased. Blindly bought – and a nice result.
Mr. Green blindly bought some U-matic video tapes. These tapes, he thought would contain copies of the BBC’s ‘Top Of The Pop’s’ or ‘Old Grey Whistle Test’ – or whatever, but they did not. After waiting years to have them converted by the correct machinery, what he discovered was that he owned a copy of the Bohemian Rhapsody video (two different versions) and some outtakes from the session. Blindly bought – major coup.
These stories are not unique. I believe both early ‘Simon and Garfunkle’ and some ‘Beatles’ tapes appeared at car boot sales, but again they were blindly bought as a batch of old tapes.
Finally, what do you realistically think happened to those stolen Queen tapes? My guess is that they are sitting in someone’s attic as you read this. (NO: certainly not mine). So while every fibre of your being tells you that those ‘Rhapsody’ out-takes do not exist, please do not be so naïve to believe that you are always correct.
Re: Queen footage.
Apart from the usual bootlegs and Queenzone downloads, I do not know what is out there film-wise - that is not my area of expertise. Certainly, I have no exclusive footage QPL may be interested in.
However, I do know that some fans are so ‘obsessed’ they take upon themselves the mantle of ‘blind-bidder’ (or as our friend Wilki would say, a ‘suicide-bidder’). Simply, sometimes unmarked – or random items come up for sale – but the owner does not know the full extent of what they are selling – and while these sales usually end up as junk – on odd occasions, they have actually turned up trumps. Here are a few examples. (Unfortunately, I am not at liberty to use real names – but most are known on Queenzone).
Mr. Red blindly bought a batch of five EMI master reel tapes. He did not know what was on them. He does not own a reel-to-reel recorder. After paying to have these digitally transferred, I believe one was of David Bowie, the other Elton John. The other three tapes have yet to be converted. Blindly bought – and so far no return.
Mr. Blue blindly bought a 7” Acetate at auction. No information was available, except that it came from Freddie Mercury who passed it onto David Minns, who was behind the sale. Unfortunately, this was not a rare Queen or even solo track, but it did turn out to be a very rare unreleased Freddie produced ‘Trax’ disc, and as we know, all ‘Trax’ material was subsequently erased. Blindly bought – and a nice result.
Mr. Green blindly bought some U-matic video tapes. These tapes, he thought would contain copies of the BBC’s ‘Top Of The Pop’s’ or ‘Old Grey Whistle Test’ – or whatever, but they did not. After waiting years to have them converted by the correct machinery, what he discovered was that he owned a copy of the Bohemian Rhapsody video (two different versions) and some outtakes from the session. Blindly bought – major coup.
These stories are not unique. I believe both early ‘Simon and Garfunkle’ and some ‘Beatles’ tapes appeared at car boot sales, but again they were blindly bought as a batch of old tapes.
Finally, what do you realistically think happened to those stolen Queen tapes? My guess is that they are sitting in someone’s attic as you read this. (NO: certainly not mine). So while every fibre of your being tells you that those ‘Rhapsody’ out-takes do not exist, please do not be so naïve to believe that you are always correct.