Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

An Archivist's view of the SiS exhibition

128 posts Page 8 of 9
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum

Sign in to watch

Watching a topic is how you opt in to reply pushes.

If Greg responds to an obviously joke post with jokes of his own, and you get wound up about it, who's the idiot?
Yeah, I'd believe it was a joke response too,  if he hadn't used an insult at the end.
No Freddie, No John.....No Queen
Eh?  A spanner is useful, tool.
Penetration_Guru wrote: Eh?  A spanner is useful, tool. =============================================================================================

A great tech-studies lesson from a well respected member, of this forum.  Amazing what a comma can get you away with as well lol - eh, PG?
Greg couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery, let alone an exhibition.
CRM displaying that reknowned Germanic tact.
Blow it out your ass.
Thanks for the write-up there Greg. Fascinating stuff. I got excited about you mentioning this exhibition actually touring. Would love it to make it to Perth in Western Australia! ;)
Thistleboy 1980 wrote:

Amazing what a comma can get you away with as well lol - eh, PG?
------------

Absolutely, cuntchops!
Looks like Ray D O'Gaga is too busy blowing the archivist to make sense.
Any chance of an extension?
I was waiting for someone to say 'piss-up in a brewery'  excellent

Anyway all that aside, I loved the exhibition so congrats to everyone involved

Togg
"It is better to sit in silence and have people think you're a fool, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt"
Penetration_Guru wrote: Thistleboy 1980 wrote:

Amazing what a comma can get you away with as well lol - eh, PG?
------------

Absolutely, cuntchops! =============================================================================================

So charming, I love ya already x
CRM wrote: Looks like Ray D O'Gaga is too busy blowing the archivist to make sense.

He should be so lucky.
Blow it out your ass.
ThomasQuinn wrote: Negative Creep wrote: But that shouldn't be present on the multitracks. They should have been recording a seperate feed to what was being mixed to go out to the pa on the night. And even if it was, it could be fixed, if the audio on that channel doesn't distort at its loudest. And that's only one of the night's audio anyway.
====

This is 1974 we're talking about. Odds are, that what was sent to the speakers is what was being recorded, warts 'n all.

Unlikely - otherwise the poor bastard on the desk wouldn't have dared move any of the faders!

You'd only have recorded what was sent out to the pa if you were just recording the stereo output of the desk. Setting up a multitrack device to a mixing desk, you'd have been recording each channel raw - otherwise there'd have been little point recording to a multitrack. How do you think they would have managed to record the ambience of the room/cheering when that certainly wouldn't have been put through to the pa on the night?
Saw this this afternoon - in the dying hours of the exhibition (and was pleased to be invited to contribute to MPT rather than being sold merchandise).

I noticed one error early on: "Seaside Rendezvous" was said to be on ADATR. :-) Later on it was right.

Particularly liked the Earl's Court footage -  but wonder about the video dropout. (I suspect it was deliberate). I had to tear myself away from it else I'd've been there FOREVER. :-)

All in all a great exhibition.
Martin