Rare Share: Queen Collectibles... Why the negativity?

[QUOTE] [b]Lostman wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]earwig wrote:[/b]

"Otherwise, this topic was created for the sole purpose of wasting people's bandwidth and time."

With negativity like that...!! :-([/QUOTE]

I'M NOT COMPLAINING, I JUST WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS. AND THERE'S NO NEGATIVITY HERE. YOU MUST'VE CONFUSED SOMETHING.[/QUOTE]

Being serious... WHERE is the rule that says the "creator" of the topic HAS to reply ALL the questions?
Otherwise i don´t think he has time to reply all the questions that were made here... tons of questions, many of them very indiscreet for him...

[QUOTE]

[b]MERQRY wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Lostman wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]earwig wrote:[/b]

"Otherwise, this topic was created for the sole purpose of wasting people's bandwidth and time."

With negativity like that...!! :-([/QUOTE]

I'M NOT COMPLAINING, I JUST WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS. AND THERE'S NO NEGATIVITY HERE. YOU MUST'VE CONFUSED SOMETHING.[/QUOTE]

Being serious... WHERE is the rule that says the "creator" of the topic HAS to reply ALL the questions?
Otherwise i don´t think he has time to reply all the questions that were made here... tons of questions, many of them very indiscreet for him...[/QUOTE]

huh, he had time for writing two big posts with big grammar mistakes ;-) and after this he`s gone!

[QUOTE]

[b]FMRTJDBM wrote: [/b] [QUOTE]

[b]MERQRY wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Lostman wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]earwig wrote:[/b]

"Otherwise, this topic was created for the sole purpose of wasting people's bandwidth and time."

With negativity like that...!! :-([/QUOTE]

I'M NOT COMPLAINING, I JUST WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS. AND THERE'S NO NEGATIVITY HERE. YOU MUST'VE CONFUSED SOMETHING.[/QUOTE]

Being serious... WHERE is the rule that says the "creator" of the topic HAS to reply ALL the questions?
Otherwise i don´t think he has time to reply all the questions that were made here... tons of questions, many of them very indiscreet for him...[/QUOTE]

huh, he had time for writing two big posts with big grammar mistakes ;-) and after this he`s gone![/QUOTE] I am more than confident that he should get to mail notices of the fact that someone did write in his topic.
Does anyone  tried to contact him by mail? Each of us probably knows his mail and he can write.

Seriously, WHAT was the reason for starting out this whole thread at all then?

getting the fans to do the hard work for them again, would be my guess

Huh

[QUOTE] [b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote:[/b]

Hello happy joyful Queenzone. It's been ages since I was here. So long, that I forgot my password and old email address - so I had to rejoin... Hence the slight name change.

Anyway... Once again several people here are finding negatives and sinister hidden agendas (where there are none) in a simple and genuinely intended YouTube channel venture Gary T and I are setting up. These people could find something underhand and generally bad in a new born baby!!

I'm always baffled at the tendency here to sway towards perceiving everything as having dark and secret motives. Gary and Greg surely must have some hidden secret agenda, right? We couldnt be doing it just because we are big fans and we love Queen memorabilia - having both been collectors since the 1970s.

Apparently, according to some bright spark here, it's us being lazy and getting you guys to send us all your information for free. Or else it's QPL planning a cunning way of getting the fans to show us what they've got. Like we don't all know already what exists out there from a million fan site web pages.

Well... No! It's none of the above. There's no clever ploy afoot, nothing sinister to debate until the cows come home or die of boredom reading this tired old predictable drivel. No, it's none of that rubbish. It is very simply two fans offering a forum for likeminded Queen fans to show and share their most interesting and significant treasures with fellow fans. Is that so hard to fathom.

If you don't want to look or contribute, that's fine. It's not compulsory. It's just something different to do, if you fancy it. If you don't, then no one has lost or gained anything.

This QZ forum has THE most suspicious and negative and mean-spirited fans of any other site. Can't the negative doom-mongers among you, just once, just for one little moment, look at this in a positive light. Regard it as something fun and interesting and constructive. Bring something good and intriguing to the table, instead of trying to knock it and cast unnecessary doubt and shadows. Certain people's tedious assertions here couldn't be wider of the mark if they tried... As usual, let's be honest.

Gary and I knew that QZ would be the place that would have people thinking the worst right from the off. And so it is.

Rare Share is a good thing for Queen fans. It's not about QPL or Gary or Greg being lazy. On the contrary... We got off our arses and did something for Queen fans. We offered something, conceived and created something new, brought something to the table... Which no one else here thought to do. 'Some' of you were the ones who did the easy thing.... The lazy thing.... You just reverted back to complain and moan mode again, and being suspicious. THAT is lazy. What we're doing, good or bad or total disaster, is at least us having a decent genuine Go!

Give it a chance, and for goodness sake cheer up and come away from the dark sinister path you love so much here. Some of you (not all) need to get out more.... to more happy and vibrant 'fan' sites I mean! This one has made too many of you decidedly jaded and cynical. Isn't it time for just the tiniest change in attitude here??

GB (yes, the real one, before someone challenges that one- yet again)[/QUOTE]

GREG, PLEASE PROVIDE US WITH ANY ANSWERS.

you're pissing into the wind mate.
think about it: Greg only ever shows up here to do one of two things:

1. criticize the whole community for various crimes ranging from hope, expectancy, or negativite realism
2. drop a "teaser bomb" of some kind - which basically lures the community in to help him doing his fucking archive job

remember the "show me yours and i'll show you mine" exchange? it was all about what actual live recordings queen had in the archive
but QZ had to TELL him first what we had. turned out (surprise surprise, falls off chair) that Greg gave us fuck-all in the way of information
- barely confirming the Queen Archive existence of extremely commonplace recordings that'd been "in the wild" for years.

FACT: QPL/Greg etc will deny the existence of almost everything (Hangman) and then act "genuinely surprised when stuff surfaces in public domain. and they will NEVER confirm the existence of anything worthwhile - because they'd rather play mind-fuck games
and treat fans like the shit-swallowers we've become accustomed to being treated like.
because we haven't told him to sling his hook years ago, we deserve no better

really though judging by everyones response on here, were telling him to Sling his hook now!

[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]

you're pissing into the wind mate.
think about it: Greg only ever shows up here to do one of two things:

1. criticize the whole community for various crimes ranging from hope, expectancy, or negativite realism
2. drop a "teaser bomb" of some kind - which basically lures the community in to help him doing his fucking archive job

remember the "show me yours and i'll show you mine" exchange? it was all about what actual live recordings queen had in the archive
but QZ had to TELL him first what we had. turned out (surprise surprise, falls off chair) that Greg gave us fuck-all in the way of information
- barely confirming the Queen Archive existence of extremely commonplace recordings that'd been "in the wild" for years.

FACT: QPL/Greg etc will deny the existence of almost everything (Hangman) and then act "genuinely surprised when stuff surfaces in public domain. and they will NEVER confirm the existence of anything worthwhile - because they'd rather play mind-fuck games
and treat fans like the shit-swallowers we've become accustomed to being treated like.
because we haven't told him to sling his hook years ago, we deserve no better[/QUOTE]

I know, I'm just taking the piss :-)

[QUOTE] [b]oliverd05 wrote:[/b]

really though judging by everyones response on here, were telling him to Sling his hook now![/QUOTE]
and it's years overdue

I think this topic also will be dead as his ferst topic.

Some have said there's no law that Greg must reply to any questions, but I'm just asking one more time again: Why create this topic when you know that lots of questions are going to materialise as the discussion progresses?

If he hadn't wanted to answer any questions neither see them arise, he wouldn't have started out this whole damn discussion. And with negativity like that, saying that this forum's fans are a bunch of moaning shite.

Greg simply snotty woman in a man's body

Rainbow 1974 two complete nights, Earls Court 1977 second complete night, and Paris 1979 three complete nights.