Rare Share: Queen Collectibles... Why the negativity?

[QUOTE] [b]FMRTJDBM wrote:[/b]

I`m sorry but I am agree with you. He provides incomplete information, besides, he blatantly lied. here is example his letter which he sent to me long time ago. 

[b]Yes the Queens real official archives are having Hammersmith "1979" with 14
multi track celaloid tapes. So they can make this 5.1 SS all around sound. Plus
we use the privite rehearsal filmings we have - with Queen rehersing Spread Your
Wings, and Paul McCartney is seeing in the back ground on the stage setting up
with the Wings roadies - 2.45 minutes. Ian Dury and Blockheads are in the
background rehearsing as well - but badly quality and blurred very badly quality
but rare filming. Very exceeding footage no person has seeing secret.

This is being the next DVD, after Budapest. Budapest is lightening
great production too. New interview with Brian and Roger 40 minutes - 40.22, and
we find old interview with John Deacon during Budapest soundcheck, he is wearing
shorts and bad purple shirt!!! Badly sounded because the background guitars and
is too noisey and feedback. But is excessive rare interesting and we use them.
We also put in some lost Budapest peaces thats not on the first videos, ever,
not once. You will excited them DVDs a lot. Budapest will being the November
released. Hammersmith Odeon Xmas market, deceber 16 - and double sets CD with
bonus item interview with recorder guy John Etchells seven minutes.[/b][/QUOTE]

This would be AMAZING. If it was true. Well, maybe in Xmas 2052 :-)

[QUOTE]

[b]cmsdrums wrote: [/b] If you can actually copy and post Greg's original message rather than relay it in your own words then I'm more likely to believe some of this.[/QUOTE]

Huh, well  where then John Deacon interview? Those about what GB told?

[QUOTE] [b]cmsdrums wrote:[/b]

If you can actually copy and post Greg's original message rather than relay it in your own words then I'm more likely to believe some of this.[/QUOTE]

The thing is, the original letter from Greg was specifically bad written, with bad grammar, just to mock the guy who posted it above. It's not his own interpretation of the letter - it's the [b]real[/b] letter from Greg himself!

[QUOTE]

[b]pittrek wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]FMRTJDBM wrote:[/b]

I`m sorry but I am agree with you. He provides incomplete information, besides, he blatantly lied. here is example his letter which he sent to me long time ago. 

[b]Yes the Queens real official archives are having Hammersmith "1979" with 14
multi track celaloid tapes. So they can make this 5.1 SS all around sound. Plus
we use the privite rehearsal filmings we have - with Queen rehersing Spread Your
Wings, and Paul McCartney is seeing in the back ground on the stage setting up
with the Wings roadies - 2.45 minutes. Ian Dury and Blockheads are in the
background rehearsing as well - but badly quality and blurred very badly quality
but rare filming. Very exceeding footage no person has seeing secret.

This is being the next DVD, after Budapest. Budapest is lightening
great production too. New interview with Brian and Roger 40 minutes - 40.22, and
we find old interview with John Deacon during Budapest soundcheck, he is wearing
shorts and bad purple shirt!!! Badly sounded because the background guitars and
is too noisey and feedback. But is excessive rare interesting and we use them.
We also put in some lost Budapest peaces thats not on the first videos, ever,
not once. You will excited them DVDs a lot. Budapest will being the November
released. Hammersmith Odeon Xmas market, deceber 16 - and double sets CD with
bonus item interview with recorder guy John Etchells seven minutes.[/b][/QUOTE]

This would be AMAZING. If it was true. Well, maybe in Xmas 2052 :-)[/QUOTE]
Huh, I understand your sarcasm, really

I assume GB will be furious ;-)

Oh no

Oh yeah! He will. He doesn't understand simple fans wishes

2013 will need to be the GREAT year for us, 40 years of the first album!!!

[QUOTE] [b]pittrek wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]MERQRY wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Doga wrote:[/b]

According to queenlive.ca, an incredible source of Queen knowledge, HP was shoot on 16 mm.[/QUOTE]

Stored on 16 mm doesn´t mean recorded on 16 mm...
Hyde Park was shoot on video. it doesn´t look like film even in the best source (the last official Queen documentary).[/QUOTE]

The concert itself was shot undoubtedly on video. The pre-concert footage looks like film[/QUOTE]

The pre-concert footage looks like 8mm.... i hope they (QP) still have it in the archives

If Paul Prenter was the reason Queen lost America in the 80's, Greg Brooks is becoming the reason Queen Productions have an awful image with the fans. Sadly i blame Brian ,Rog , John and Jim for not caring about their fans having a confrontational bully in charge of their archive. Time to tweet brian about this.

[QUOTE]

[b]Ozz wrote: [/b] If Paul Prenter was the reason Queen lost America in the 80's, Greg Brooks is becoming the reason Queen Productions have an awful image with the fans. Sadly i blame Brian ,Rog , John and Jim for not caring about their fans having a confrontational bully in charge of their archive. Time to tweet brian about this.[/QUOTE]

I think you give GB too much credit.  QPL is solely responsible for what to release to the fans.

[QUOTE] [b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote:[/b]

Hello happy joyful Queenzone. It's been ages since I was here. So long, that I forgot my password and old email address - so I had to rejoin... Hence the slight name change.
[/QUOTE]

His account was banned for trolling a while ago and he's trying to pretend that it's all smooth. Admins pls take a notice.

[QUOTE]

[b]ridgewater wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote:[/b]

Hello happy joyful Queenzone. It's been ages since I was here. So long, that I forgot my password and old email address - so I had to rejoin... Hence the slight name change.
[/QUOTE]

He was account was banned for trolling a while ago and he's trying to pretend that it's all smooth. Admins pls take a notice.
[/QUOTE]

[b]That is, you want to say that this person under the name Greg Brooks is an imposter?
[/b]

It would've been a fair enough point. Shame about GB's distinct lack of eloquence.

[QUOTE] [b]MERQRY wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Doga wrote:[/b]

According to queenlive.ca, an incredible source of Queen knowledge, HP was shoot on 16 mm.[/QUOTE]

Stored on 16 mm doesn´t mean recorded on 16 mm...
Hyde Park was shoot on video. it doesn´t look like film even in the best source (the last official Queen documentary).[/QUOTE]


Absolutely!
I'm also convinced that the Rainbow November 74 concerts were also filmed on videotape, yet all we hear from QPL now is 'film'....