[QUOTE] [b]Lostman wrote:[/b]
Rainbow 1974 two complete nights, Earls Court 1977 second complete night, and Paris 1979 three complete nights.[/QUOTE]
What about them?
Bad Seed
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Bad Seed
[QUOTE] [b]Lostman wrote:[/b]
Rainbow 1974 two complete nights, Earls Court 1977 second complete night, and Paris 1979 three complete nights.[/QUOTE]
What about them?
Rainbow 1974 two complete nights, Earls Court 1977 second complete night, and Paris 1979 three complete nights.[/QUOTE]
What about them?
Hangman_96
[QUOTE] [b]Bad Seed wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lostman wrote:[/b]
Rainbow 1974 two complete nights, Earls Court 1977 second complete night, and Paris 1979 three complete nights.[/QUOTE]
What about them?[/QUOTE]
I would like to see them. That was all I wanted to say.
[QUOTE] [b]Lostman wrote:[/b]
Rainbow 1974 two complete nights, Earls Court 1977 second complete night, and Paris 1979 three complete nights.[/QUOTE]
What about them?[/QUOTE]
I would like to see them. That was all I wanted to say.
FMRTJDBM
it seems to me that Greg Brooks was drunk when he wrote the text and created a themes
pma
[QUOTE] [b]Zebonka12 wrote:[/b]
"today I can´t to buy any official concert video (or new full audio) with Freddie without moustache ... WHY????"
I think it's just a case of Brian underestimating what people are willing to pay for. He's mentioned the bad image quality of the 70's gigs before as being a factor - who cares? The fact that Georges Méliès' film "Le Voyage dans la lune" isn't in colour 1080p doesn't stop it from being a worthy buy.
Gigs in the 70's were shot on shitty videotape. We don't care, Brian. Get that stuff out the door.
.[/QUOTE]
Ex'fucking'actly.
A lesson in business for QP:
YOU HAVE VIDEO? YES
I HAVE MONEY, YES
YOU GIVE VIDEO, YES
I GIVE MONEY, YES
YOU NOT GIVE VIDEO, NO?
I NOT GIVE MONEY.
YOU GIVE OLD BORING SHIT.
I NOT GIVE MONEY. GOODBYE.
Understood?
"today I can´t to buy any official concert video (or new full audio) with Freddie without moustache ... WHY????"
I think it's just a case of Brian underestimating what people are willing to pay for. He's mentioned the bad image quality of the 70's gigs before as being a factor - who cares? The fact that Georges Méliès' film "Le Voyage dans la lune" isn't in colour 1080p doesn't stop it from being a worthy buy.
Gigs in the 70's were shot on shitty videotape. We don't care, Brian. Get that stuff out the door.
.[/QUOTE]
Ex'fucking'actly.
A lesson in business for QP:
YOU HAVE VIDEO? YES
I HAVE MONEY, YES
YOU GIVE VIDEO, YES
I GIVE MONEY, YES
YOU NOT GIVE VIDEO, NO?
I NOT GIVE MONEY.
YOU GIVE OLD BORING SHIT.
I NOT GIVE MONEY. GOODBYE.
Understood?
FMRTJDBM
[QUOTE]
[b]pma wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Zebonka12 wrote:[/b]
"today I can´t to buy any official concert video (or new full audio) with Freddie without moustache ... WHY????"
I think it's just a case of Brian underestimating what people are willing to pay for. He's mentioned the bad image quality of the 70's gigs before as being a factor - who cares? The fact that Georges Méliès' film "Le Voyage dans la lune" isn't in colour 1080p doesn't stop it from being a worthy buy.
Gigs in the 70's were shot on shitty videotape. We don't care, Brian. Get that stuff out the door.
.[/QUOTE]
Ex'fucking'actly.
A lesson in business for QP:
YOU HAVE VIDEO? YES
I HAVE MONEY, YES
YOU GIVE VIDEO, YES
I GIVE MONEY, YES
YOU NOT GIVE VIDEO, NO?
I NOT GIVE MONEY.
YOU GIVE OLD BORING SHIT.
I NOT GIVE MONEY. GOODBYE.
Understood?
[/QUOTE] You excuse me, but I began to doubt that GB: Queen Archivist is real Greg Brooks/
[b]pma wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Zebonka12 wrote:[/b]
"today I can´t to buy any official concert video (or new full audio) with Freddie without moustache ... WHY????"
I think it's just a case of Brian underestimating what people are willing to pay for. He's mentioned the bad image quality of the 70's gigs before as being a factor - who cares? The fact that Georges Méliès' film "Le Voyage dans la lune" isn't in colour 1080p doesn't stop it from being a worthy buy.
Gigs in the 70's were shot on shitty videotape. We don't care, Brian. Get that stuff out the door.
.[/QUOTE]
Ex'fucking'actly.
A lesson in business for QP:
YOU HAVE VIDEO? YES
I HAVE MONEY, YES
YOU GIVE VIDEO, YES
I GIVE MONEY, YES
YOU NOT GIVE VIDEO, NO?
I NOT GIVE MONEY.
YOU GIVE OLD BORING SHIT.
I NOT GIVE MONEY. GOODBYE.
Understood?
[/QUOTE] You excuse me, but I began to doubt that GB: Queen Archivist is real Greg Brooks/
FMRTJDBM
[QUOTE]
[b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote: [/b] Hello happy joyful Queenzone. It's been ages since I was here. So long, that I forgot my password and old email address - so I had to rejoin... Hence the slight name change.
Anyway... Once again several people here are finding negatives and sinister hidden agendas (where there are none) in a simple and genuinely intended YouTube channel venture Gary T and I are setting up. These people could find something underhand and generally bad in a new born baby!!
I'm always baffled at the tendency here to sway towards perceiving everything as having dark and secret motives. Gary and Greg surely must have some hidden secret agenda, right? We couldnt be doing it just because we are big fans and we love Queen memorabilia - having both been collectors since the 1970s.
Apparently, according to some bright spark here, it's us being lazy and getting you guys to send us all your information for free. Or else it's QPL planning a cunning way of getting the fans to show us what they've got. Like we don't all know already what exists out there from a million fan site web pages.
Well... No! It's none of the above. There's no clever ploy afoot, nothing sinister to debate until the cows come home or die of boredom reading this tired old predictable drivel. No, it's none of that rubbish. It is very simply two fans offering a forum for likeminded Queen fans to show and share their most interesting and significant treasures with fellow fans. Is that so hard to fathom.
If you don't want to look or contribute, that's fine. It's not compulsory. It's just something different to do, if you fancy it. If you don't, then no one has lost or gained anything.
This QZ forum has THE most suspicious and negative and mean-spirited fans of any other site. Can't the negative doom-mongers among you, just once, just for one little moment, look at this in a positive light. Regard it as something fun and interesting and constructive. Bring something good and intriguing to the table, instead of trying to knock it and cast unnecessary doubt and shadows. Certain people's tedious assertions here couldn't be wider of the mark if they tried... As usual, let's be honest.
Gary and I knew that QZ would be the place that would have people thinking the worst right from the off. And so it is.
Rare Share is a good thing for Queen fans. It's not about QPL or Gary or Greg being lazy. On the contrary... We got off our arses and did something for Queen fans. We offered something, conceived and created something new, brought something to the table... Which no one else here thought to do. 'Some' of you were the ones who did the easy thing.... The lazy thing.... You just reverted back to complain and moan mode again, and being suspicious. THAT is lazy. What we're doing, good or bad or total disaster, is at least us having a decent genuine Go!
Give it a chance, and for goodness sake cheer up and come away from the dark sinister path you love so much here. Some of you (not all) need to get out more.... to more happy and vibrant 'fan' sites I mean! This one has made too many of you decidedly jaded and cynical. Isn't it time for just the tiniest change in attitude here??
GB (yes, the real one, before someone challenges that one- yet again)[/QUOTE]
[b]Hi, Greg.
You have no right to ignore my posts. You have no right to ignore the messages of others people. Especially in those cases when you give a mean information, and never telling all.
Apparently you think that writing a great post and giving hints you kill two birds with one stone. Nothing like that, Greg. We do not like dry food that we throw if only we shut up. We love and want the food we tried to explain and put into his mouth. and bigger and fatter. Do you understand what I'm getting at?
Do you charge us in ignorance and rudeness and insatiable desire. What did you expect? We want it all, we want it now
[/b]
[b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote: [/b] Hello happy joyful Queenzone. It's been ages since I was here. So long, that I forgot my password and old email address - so I had to rejoin... Hence the slight name change.
Anyway... Once again several people here are finding negatives and sinister hidden agendas (where there are none) in a simple and genuinely intended YouTube channel venture Gary T and I are setting up. These people could find something underhand and generally bad in a new born baby!!
I'm always baffled at the tendency here to sway towards perceiving everything as having dark and secret motives. Gary and Greg surely must have some hidden secret agenda, right? We couldnt be doing it just because we are big fans and we love Queen memorabilia - having both been collectors since the 1970s.
Apparently, according to some bright spark here, it's us being lazy and getting you guys to send us all your information for free. Or else it's QPL planning a cunning way of getting the fans to show us what they've got. Like we don't all know already what exists out there from a million fan site web pages.
Well... No! It's none of the above. There's no clever ploy afoot, nothing sinister to debate until the cows come home or die of boredom reading this tired old predictable drivel. No, it's none of that rubbish. It is very simply two fans offering a forum for likeminded Queen fans to show and share their most interesting and significant treasures with fellow fans. Is that so hard to fathom.
If you don't want to look or contribute, that's fine. It's not compulsory. It's just something different to do, if you fancy it. If you don't, then no one has lost or gained anything.
This QZ forum has THE most suspicious and negative and mean-spirited fans of any other site. Can't the negative doom-mongers among you, just once, just for one little moment, look at this in a positive light. Regard it as something fun and interesting and constructive. Bring something good and intriguing to the table, instead of trying to knock it and cast unnecessary doubt and shadows. Certain people's tedious assertions here couldn't be wider of the mark if they tried... As usual, let's be honest.
Gary and I knew that QZ would be the place that would have people thinking the worst right from the off. And so it is.
Rare Share is a good thing for Queen fans. It's not about QPL or Gary or Greg being lazy. On the contrary... We got off our arses and did something for Queen fans. We offered something, conceived and created something new, brought something to the table... Which no one else here thought to do. 'Some' of you were the ones who did the easy thing.... The lazy thing.... You just reverted back to complain and moan mode again, and being suspicious. THAT is lazy. What we're doing, good or bad or total disaster, is at least us having a decent genuine Go!
Give it a chance, and for goodness sake cheer up and come away from the dark sinister path you love so much here. Some of you (not all) need to get out more.... to more happy and vibrant 'fan' sites I mean! This one has made too many of you decidedly jaded and cynical. Isn't it time for just the tiniest change in attitude here??
GB (yes, the real one, before someone challenges that one- yet again)[/QUOTE]
[b]Hi, Greg.
You have no right to ignore my posts. You have no right to ignore the messages of others people. Especially in those cases when you give a mean information, and never telling all.
Apparently you think that writing a great post and giving hints you kill two birds with one stone. Nothing like that, Greg. We do not like dry food that we throw if only we shut up. We love and want the food we tried to explain and put into his mouth. and bigger and fatter. Do you understand what I'm getting at?
Do you charge us in ignorance and rudeness and insatiable desire. What did you expect? We want it all, we want it now
[/b]
Holly2003
Oh shut up would you. You're a bigger whiner than GB.
cmsdrums
Does Greg have every right to ignore our questions? YES
Should he ignore our mostly sensible and above board questions, which are specifically in response to 'bait' laid by him after he starts a thread? NO
Is Greg's contribution here (of which his threads of the last few days are a perfect example) totally embarrassing to him when compared to Rhys Thomas' recent in depth and informative online Q&A with fans? MOST DEFINITELY
Should he ignore our mostly sensible and above board questions, which are specifically in response to 'bait' laid by him after he starts a thread? NO
Is Greg's contribution here (of which his threads of the last few days are a perfect example) totally embarrassing to him when compared to Rhys Thomas' recent in depth and informative online Q&A with fans? MOST DEFINITELY
jones904
[QUOTE] [b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote:[/b]
Well... No! It's none of the above. There's no clever ploy afoot, nothing sinister
This QZ forum has THE most suspicious and negative and mean-spirited fans of any other site. Can't the negative doom-mongers among you, just once, just for one little moment, look at this in a positive light.
Regard it as something fun and interesting and constructive. Bring something good and intriguing to the table, instead of trying to knock it and cast unnecessary doubt and shadows.
Definition of INTRIGUE. 1. a: a secret scheme : machination. b: the practice of engaging in secret schemes . 2: a clandestine love affair
Well... No! It's none of the above. There's no clever ploy afoot, nothing sinister
This QZ forum has THE most suspicious and negative and mean-spirited fans of any other site. Can't the negative doom-mongers among you, just once, just for one little moment, look at this in a positive light.
Regard it as something fun and interesting and constructive. Bring something good and intriguing to the table, instead of trying to knock it and cast unnecessary doubt and shadows.
Definition of INTRIGUE. 1. a: a secret scheme : machination. b: the practice of engaging in secret schemes . 2: a clandestine love affair
FMRTJDBM
GB We demand answers to our questions.
Rick
Seems nothing has changed on QZ ;-)
Greg gets us fans excited about some secret Rainbow project, but leaves the key questions unanswered.
Greg gets us fans excited about some secret Rainbow project, but leaves the key questions unanswered.
brENsKi
yes...a bit c*ntish to say the least
GB: Queen Archivist
[QUOTE] [b]Rick wrote:[/b]
Seems nothing has changed on QZ ;-)
Greg gets us fans excited about some secret Rainbow project, but leaves the key questions unanswered.
[/QUOTE]
What a teasing beast he is!!!!
He should be telling us every tiny detail about the proposed set, so that when it emerges there is no surprise element at all. We will all have known exactly what we're getting MONTHS in advance. Greg should also tell all the children around the world exactly what Santa has brought them for Xmas. Who cares about expectation and excitement and surprise any more?????
Seems nothing has changed on QZ ;-)
Greg gets us fans excited about some secret Rainbow project, but leaves the key questions unanswered.
[/QUOTE]
What a teasing beast he is!!!!
He should be telling us every tiny detail about the proposed set, so that when it emerges there is no surprise element at all. We will all have known exactly what we're getting MONTHS in advance. Greg should also tell all the children around the world exactly what Santa has brought them for Xmas. Who cares about expectation and excitement and surprise any more?????
earwig
Greg
Please don't think (and I'm sure you don't) that all of us fans are like the small minority!!!
Most of us are grateful and SANE!!!
If Queen Productions never release another new product then... that's their right!!! (and there's always bootlegs for us lot to fall back on *wink-wink*!!)
Please don't think (and I'm sure you don't) that all of us fans are like the small minority!!!
Most of us are grateful and SANE!!!
If Queen Productions never release another new product then... that's their right!!! (and there's always bootlegs for us lot to fall back on *wink-wink*!!)